209
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 19 Mar 2024
209 points (96.9% liked)
News
23305 readers
5038 users here now
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.
Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.
7. No duplicate posts.
If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners.
The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
I asked "how is one person dying better than another"?
By answering, you are more or less directly saying a ganganger's life isn't worth as much, because they "chose" to be involved in a life of crime.
That shows that you think some people are worth more than others. Why?
It also shows very little understanding towards the type of people who often are involved in crime, without having much of a say in it.
Please, watch the video.
Is a Hitler's life worth less than a kindergarten teacher who has sent hundreds of children off into successful and happy lives through a loving education?
You're now admitting to exactly what I said in my first comment. You don't care about the crime and the violence, because the kids dying are over 16 and in gangs.
You use that as your justification for accepting it, and then you judge all gun crime to be gang crime.
A very convenient way to not address the fact that the US is the only developed country in the world where the leading cause of death for children is firearm injuries.
Firearms Now No. 1 Cause Of Death For U.S. Children
Did you watch the video?
Are you a bot?
As I said before, this exact attitude is what confounds me.
You simply don't care about the massive amount of kids dying from firearm injuries. At least you dont seem to, going out of your way to justify it. "It's just gang crime." As if kids dying in gang shootouts don't have parents left to mourn them. As if they don't matter.
Why?
It's as if you were robbed of the ability to see a thing in the world. Or given an ability to ignore whatever makes you uncomfortable. The latter makes more sense.
I know you don't want to admit to valuing people's differently, because you know that's wrong. However, you were very comfortable in implying it, using the excuse of "they have it coming, they chose a life of crime, and thus their lives are worth less."
You just can't say any of that out loud.
I wish Insider and Forbes was paying me to share their stories. No such luck. They're (the Insider stories, not Forbes magazine) just really good, and help to increase understanding of things some people would never be directly exposed to otherwise.
Yikes.
That's another thing, why do you feel the need to reply with silly one word answers when you're desperately avoiding anything I say?
It would seem to indicate you care about something.
That something seems to be about your ego. You put forth the thought that people aren't equal, and then don't refute it when I ask if that's what you really meant. You don't care, yet you can't help but replying.
I'm sure even you now see what I mean with "willfull ignorance". Or perhaps you're willfully ignoring that realisation too.