337
submitted 6 months ago by HowRu68@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world

And here we go again, another bOING 737 Max.

all 45 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] maynarkh@feddit.nl 123 points 6 months ago

This is the result of corporate America not holding its executives personally accountable for gross negligence, and the unregulated monopolistic nature of a bunch of markets. It is well known in the industry that the whole fiasco regarding the 737 Max is caused by the acquisition of McDonnell-Douglas, and its shitty management that integrated with Boeing.

Who was held responsible for those 300 people dying? Who would have been for these guys? Who will be for the next accident?

[-] perviouslyiner@lemmy.world 24 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Weird that the company used to have a safety culture before the acquisition - I just can't imagine an aircraft company wanting to throw that away when it's so valuable to customer trust.

[-] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 27 points 6 months ago

It’s because the finance chucklefucks ran the numbers, saw data that indicated simply paying out injury and wrongful death settlements and safety penalties appeared to be cheaper than designing a new airframe, and went that route. It’s very literally all a numbers game, and the only numbers that really matter to these idiots are the ones with $ in the front.

[-] Untitled4774@sh.itjust.works 4 points 6 months ago

I just watched Fight Club again, and this was literally Ed Norton’s character’s job.

a x b x c

If the number for the recall or redesign is higher than the lawsuits, they don’t do it. They let people die.

The only way to fight it is to have an automatic adjustment to all unit and wrongful death payouts times 10, hell 1000. There should be no cost on a human life.

lol I gotta watch that again

[-] kcuf@lemmy.world 22 points 6 months ago

Watch the documentaries, the former MD board basically took over Boeing, moved leadership out of WA to Chicago, set up separate plants (one in Georgia not sure if there are more) to counter union/worker demands in WA, etc. This has been a long process resulting in the rotting of the company from the inside out. The 787 was the first example of their garbage - - even though I like the plane, it had a lot of issues.

[-] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 15 points 6 months ago

Mergers of this type usually have one corporate culture win out over the other. In this case, Boeing's corporate culture lost out and with it, their safety culture.

[-] 4am@lemm.ee 11 points 6 months ago

This is the result of capitalism. That’s all you needed to say.

[-] helenslunch@feddit.nl 16 points 6 months ago

You can have capitalism and still hold corporations responsible for gross negligence.

[-] greywolf0x1@lemmy.ml 1 points 6 months ago

But that's not working now, is it?

[-] helenslunch@feddit.nl 2 points 6 months ago

That's not an inherent problem with capitalism. That's a problem with corrupt and/or lazy government.

[-] Fermion@feddit.nl 84 points 6 months ago

https://youtu.be/3m5qxZm_JqM

Interviewer: This airplane that was involved in the incident off Western Oregon this week...

Senator Collins: The one the door plug fell off?

Interviewer: Yeah.

Senator Collins: Yeah, that’s not very typical, I’d like to make that point.

Interviewer: Well, how was it un-typical?

Senator Collins: Well there are a lot of these airplanes going around the world all the time, and very seldom does anything like this happen. I just don’t want people thinking that 737 max 9's aren’t safe.

...

Senator Collins: Well, some of them are built so that the door plug doesn’t fall off at all.

Interviewer: Wasn’t this built so that the door plug wouldn’t fall off?

Senator Collins: Well, obviously not.

Interviewer: How do you know?

Senator Collins: Well, because the door plug fell off at 20,000 feet and all the air spilled out. It’s a bit of a giveaway. I’d just like to make the point that that is not normal.

Interviewer: Well what sort of engineering standards are these 737 MAX 9's built to?

Senator Collins: Oh, very rigorous aerospace engineering standards.

Interviewer: What sort of thing?

Senator Collins: Well, the door plug's not supposed to fall off for a start.

...

Interviewer: So the allegations that they’re just designed to carry as many passengers as possible no matter the consequences, I mean that’s ludicrous isn’t it?

Senator Collins: Absolutely ludicrous, these are very very strong vessels.

Interviewer: So what happened in this case?

Senator Collins: Well, the door fell off in this case by all means, but it’s very unusual.

Interviewer: But Senator Collins, why did the door plug fall off?

Senator Collins: Well air hit it.

Interviewer: Air hit it?

Senator Collins: Air hit the plane.

Interviewer: Is that unusual?

Senator Collins: Oh yeah. At altitude? Chance in a million!

[-] brettvitaz@programming.dev 16 points 6 months ago

I was completely prepared to believe that this was real.

[-] Fermion@feddit.nl 14 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Yeah reality and satire are getting close enough that I almost wonder if I should add a disclaimer that's more obvious than the video link.

One of my friends thought I was quoting an interview with Susan Collins.

[-] OADINC@feddit.nl 9 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

I love it, thanks for making this.

[-] PipedLinkBot@feddit.rocks 6 points 6 months ago

Here is an alternative Piped link(s):

https://piped.video/3m5qxZm_JqM

Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.

I'm open-source; check me out at GitHub.

[-] Australis13@fedia.io 61 points 6 months ago

Multiple news articles are reporting that this aircraft had its post-production certification only two months ago. For a problem of this magnitude to develop in such a short time is very disconcerting.

[-] grayman@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago

This article says cert in Nov, entered service in Dec, and had 145 flights. This was #146.

[-] flatpandisk@lemm.ee 0 points 6 months ago

Holy heck if this is true.

[-] kerrigan778@lemmy.world 51 points 6 months ago

Just to be clear, US domestic, major carrier flying is still staggeringly safe compared to essentially all other means of travel. The NTSB is not messing around and Boeing will have a lot to explain and answer for and the issue will be corrected.

Even in this exceptional case, nobody was injured.

[-] HiddenLayer5@lemmy.ml 14 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Also, I hate Boeing as much as the next guy, but with how complex any aviation accident sequence is, I'm inclined to withhold finger pointing until the investigation concludes or at the very least a good amount of information has been released. I support grounding the planes for safety during the investigation, and I also support criticism and scrutiny of Boeing in general since they definitely deserve both, but to say this specific case was definitely Boeing's fault at this stage is being premature.

And it's not like Alaska Airlines has never caused an air accident through shoddy maintenance of otherwise soundly designed aircraft. They should absolutely not get a pass until their involvement is definitively ruled out by evidence.

[-] PipedLinkBot@feddit.rocks 3 points 6 months ago

Here is an alternative Piped link(s):

And it's not like Alaska Airlines has never caused an air accident through shoddy maintenance

Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.

I'm open-source; check me out at GitHub.

[-] PHLAK@lemmy.world 7 points 6 months ago

Thank you. This needs to be further up in the comments

[-] nicetriangle@kbin.social 44 points 6 months ago

Jesus christ the Max has been a clownshow of one problem after another

[-] TimeSquirrel@kbin.social 21 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

The entire world around you that you take for granted is built down to a price. Barely anybody makes things to be good, most make things to make money, and when it comes to potentially dangerous things, the risk of harm or loss of life is factored into profit. "How many people can we kill before we are forced to shut this down or spend money to make it better?"

Beware when putting trust in human-created technology. I bet there's more than one engineer in here who wanted to design something the right way, but was then forced to cut some corners by a bean counter. It's everywhere.

Giving an example from my wheelhouse, there are stories of managers going around to engineer's prototype PCBs and snipping off decoupling capacitors one by one until the device barely functions in a stable manner. The manager then declares that that is the appropriate amount of capacitors. Also, if you want a quick heart attack, just take apart any cheap Amazon phone charger and examine it.

[-] buffalobuffalo@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 6 months ago

That's why I only buy ant-created technology.

--sent from my antPhone

[-] autotldr@lemmings.world 17 points 6 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


Alaska Airlines grounded its fleet of Boeing 737 Max 9 aircraft on Friday after a flight operated by the airline made an emergency landing at Portland International Airport in Oregon that evening because of a midair pressure problem that passengers said blew out a chunk of the fuselage.

As yellow oxygen masks dangled above their heads, a powerful wind tore through a gaping hole that showed the night sky and the city lights below.

Her friend Elizabeth Le, 20, said she had also heard “an extremely loud pop.” When she looked up, she saw a large hole on the wall of the plane about two or three rows away, she said.

In 2018, Lion Air Flight 610, a 737 Max 8, crashed into the ocean off the coast of Indonesia, killing all 189 passengers and crew members.

Less than five months later in 2019, Ethiopian Airlines Flight 302 crashed shortly after leaving Ethiopia’s capital, Addis Ababa, killing all 157 people on board.

In 2021, the company agreed to a $2.5 billion settlement with the Justice Department, resolving a criminal charge that Boeing conspired to defraud the agency.


The original article contains 946 words, the summary contains 187 words. Saved 80%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[-] Yewb@lemmy.world 16 points 6 months ago

Eshitification hitting aerospace

[-] verity_kindle@sh.itjust.works 14 points 6 months ago

I love it when the passengers are spilling the tea, before Boeing's lawyers can get to them and attempt to smother their words with money. By the time the NHTSA gets to interview passengers, they've "calmed down", it seems. I don't know if that's good for screw ups of this magnitude. Hurrah for a plane of pissed off, uninjured survivors! God bless them.

[-] kerrigan778@lemmy.world 9 points 6 months ago

For the record, you mean the NTSB, NHTSA is for highway safety.

[-] verity_kindle@sh.itjust.works 4 points 6 months ago

Yes, thank you for that.

[-] cestvrai@lemm.ee 11 points 6 months ago

https://archive.is/YsTla

I’m not comfortable flying on new Boeing planes.

[-] Aatube@kbin.social 6 points 6 months ago

Protips:

  1. Use archive.today URLs, which automatically redirect to the most appropriate server.
  2. https://gitlab.com/magnolia1234/bypass-paywalls-firefox-clean/
[-] ChunkMcHorkle@lemmy.world 0 points 6 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

deleted by creator

[-] MrJukes@lemmy.today 2 points 6 months ago

I flew in one to get home from Christmas vacation. The seat was literally the most uncomfortable airplane seat I ever sat in. It was like sitting on a concrete bench. I'm going to need to start bringing a seat cushion...

[-] crispy_kilt@feddit.de 1 points 6 months ago

smug airbus noises

this post was submitted on 06 Jan 2024
337 points (98.0% liked)

Technology

55919 readers
2579 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS