684
submitted 7 months ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

The former president files several fresh motions to toss out Fulton County election interference charges

Attorneys for Donald Trump claim that the former president didn’t have “fair notice” that his attempts to reverse his Georgia loss in the 2020 presidential election could result in criminal charges against him.

A flurry of filings in Fulton County Superior Court on Monday argue that the sprawling election interference case against Mr Trump “consists entirely of core political speech at the zenith of First Amendment protections”.

Attorneys for the former president want the case dismissed on grounds that he has “presidential immunity” from actions while in office, that he was already acquitted for similar allegations in his second impeachment trial, and that he was never told that what he was doing in the state – where he is charged as part of an alleged racketeering scheme to unlawfully subvert the state’s election results – could be prosecuted.

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Kronusdark@lemmy.world 12 points 7 months ago

I've seen judges go off the handle for less stupidity.

[-] SoupBrick@yiffit.net 12 points 7 months ago

They are just dragging this out as long as humanly possible in hopes that trump will win the election. It is kinda sad seeing how incompetent the US court systems have become. I know this is a very sensitive case, but the violence they fear will occur should be treated as the terrorism it is. We shouldn't have to worry about violent retribution from lead poisoned adults with guns if their god is not crowned king.

[-] BradleyUffner@lemmy.world 11 points 7 months ago

Ahh, it's the old "you never prosecuted me for anything before, you can't start now" defense.

[-] BigMacHole@lemm.ee 9 points 7 months ago

That's the Leader of the Law and Order Party!

[-] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 9 points 7 months ago

What do you mean I'm not allowed to walk into a bank with an assault rifle, start shooting around and demand all their money?

I'm innocent, nobody ever told me that was illegal!

[-] drmeanfeel@lemmy.world 9 points 7 months ago

Well that's not very Party Law and Order of you Donald

[-] foggianism@lemmy.world 8 points 7 months ago

"I had no idea people would care about the law that much, because I don't."

[-] IphtashuFitz@lemmy.world 8 points 7 months ago

So, the “whoops, my bad” defense now?

[-] moon@lemmy.cafe 6 points 7 months ago

The young children didn't have notice either when he had "sexual relations" with them at Epstein's mansion.

[-] Kbobabob@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago

You know he didn't need to go Epstein's Island. He had a young teenage "hot" girl at home. She might have even had friends over from time to time.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Hadriscus@lemm.ee 5 points 7 months ago

Nul n'est censé ignorer la loi

[-] WashedOver@lemmy.ca 5 points 7 months ago

It's not like this is his first dealings with election recounts. He was involved with shutting down Jill Stein's attempts at recounts for the 2016 election.

In November 2016, a group of computer scientists and election lawyers including J. Alex Halderman and John Bonifaz (founder of the National Voting Rights Institute) expressed concerns about the integrity of the presidential election results. They wanted a full audit or recount of the presidential election votes in three states key to Donald Trump's electoral college win—Michigan, Wisconsin, and Pennsylvania—but needed a candidate on the presidential ballot to file the petition to state authorities. After unsuccessfully lobbying Hillary Clinton and her team, the group approached Stein and she agreed to spearhead the recount effort.[74]

A crowdfunding campaign launched on November 24, 2016, to support the costs of the recount, raised more than $2.5 million in under 24 hours,[75] and $6.7 million in nearly a week.[76] On November 25, 2016, with 90 minutes remaining on the deadline to petition for a recount to Wisconsin's electoral body, Stein filed for a recount of its presidential election results. She signaled she intended to file for similar recounts in the subsequent days in Michigan and Pennsylvania.[77]

President-elect Donald Trump issued a statement denouncing the recount request saying, "The people have spoken and the election is over." Trump further commented that the recount "is a scam by the Green Party for an election that has already been conceded."[78]

[-] gmtom@lemmy.world 5 points 7 months ago

His lawyers know its not a good argument. The point isn't to win, it's just to stall as long as possible.

[-] WoahWoah@lemmy.world 4 points 7 months ago

"Sorry officer, I didn't know I couldn't do that."

[-] darth_tiktaalik@lemmy.ml 4 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

With all his whining about rigged elections he of all people should know you can't ask election officials to "find" you exactly the amount of votes you need to win that election.

[-] sebinspace@lemmy.world 4 points 7 months ago

Did he just admit to lacking common sense?

[-] Kbobabob@lemmy.world 5 points 7 months ago

Anyone that's ever actually listened to him speak knows he's dumb as fuck.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›
this post was submitted on 08 Jan 2024
684 points (96.0% liked)

News

22488 readers
4345 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS