71
submitted 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) by Blaze@discuss.online to c/nostalgia@lemmy.ca
top 27 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Anticorp@lemmy.world 34 points 5 months ago

In the end, it didn't really matter.

[-] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 7 points 5 months ago

"But we've really moved away from anything that sounds like nu-metal. I know that we kind of helped create, I guess, the sound of that genre, but I hate that genre. I'm not going to speak for everyone, but I can personally tell you that I am not a big fan of almost everybody in that category. There are a few bands that I don't really believe belong in there, and we're one of those bands."

"I hate it when people call us nu-metal. Not because it sucks, well that is one reason too, but mostly because it's so in the box. We are not limited. We are not a band that's fixed to a genre, we like pop, rock, hip hop, folk, country and what we do is a blend of all of that."

  • Chester
[-] Anticorp@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago

I dig it. I never even heard the label until this thread. I always thought that style of music was a new evolution, a fusion of hard rock, alternative, rap, rasta, and reggae. Bands experimented with music a lot in that era, blending the genres together, and I really appreciated it. Then it all just went away, and we were left with nothing but pop and mumble rap getting promoted after that period of time. I used to think that the world went so hard for pop at the end of the 90's because everyone was tired of being depressed, and surrounded by grunge, but now I know it's just because the studios figured out a formula that churned out new "artists" without a need for originality or creativity.

[-] roadrunner_ex@lemmy.ca 29 points 5 months ago

For anyone legitimately wondering, nu metal is still alive and well in one form or another, it just isn't getting nearly as much press or support as it used to. You can also hear its influence in a lot of modern metal, metalcore, and some more experimental rap

https://bandcamp.com/discover/nu-metal

[-] Anticorp@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago

Thanks, yo!

[-] Blaze@discuss.online 1 points 5 months ago
[-] Lemonparty@lemm.ee 25 points 5 months ago

There's plenty of rock that sounds similar to those bands still out there and being made very successfully. The real problem is that your method of exposure has changed. You remember all these because they happened at a time when radio and MTV were how most people discovered ALL music. The only other way was word of mouth exposure. It's never been easier than it is today to discover new music, but the flip side is that breakouts are few and further between, and largely only cater to whatever is already popular. It's why "everything sounds the same" now - because a lot of what is mainstream literally is the same. Same tempo, key, beat, rhythm, vocal patterns etc. If Freak on a Leash, Wait and Bleed, or Break Stuff came out today, 99% of people would never know because it wouldn't be played on any radio station. Gotta save that valuable air time for (way) more ads, and the same tswift and weeknd songs you heard 35 minutes ago.

As for numetal specifically, the real answer is that 5 of 6 of these weren't really metal of any sort, but they also didn't fit nicely into a TRL genre (Slipknot being the mega exception - they were very metal from the get go). I'm not going to get into a debate on what is and is not metal and more importantly not disparage anyone for what they like or don't like! I'm not disparaging any of these bands at all just noting that part of what made them standouts is that they didn't have a nice neat genre to fit into. Slipknot largely stayed Slipknot, and the other either evolved (LP, PR), didn't have staying power (Evanescence, LB) or had a good run and split up (Korn).

Slipknot is no longer as trashy (in the metal sense) and raw as they were, but they are still churning out albums and selling out arenas. So is Papa Roach for that matter (though they play much smaller venues than Slipknot)!

[-] Blaze@discuss.online 2 points 5 months ago

Thank you for the detailed answer

[-] ivanafterall@kbin.social 13 points 5 months ago

It got old.

[-] NESSI3 13 points 5 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)
[-] DigitalTraveler42@lemmy.world 13 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

https://www.revolvermag.com/music/10-bands-leading-new-wave-nu-metal

Spiritbox is the new but way better Evanescence.

Check out Death Grips, Nova Twins, Ice Nine Kills, Dropout Kings, Sleep Token, King 810.

Also never listened to them but XIII, Tetrarch, and Tallah all seem to come highly recommended, might have to check them out myself.

[-] Snowpix@lemmy.ca 3 points 5 months ago

Add Bloodywood to the mix, it's Indian folk nu metal. Incredibly good.

[-] whoisearth@lemmy.ca 2 points 5 months ago

Like indigenous or south Asian? Either way I'm intrigued

[-] goldenbug@kbin.social 2 points 5 months ago

Totally agree with Spiritbox.

[-] Kilnier@lemmy.ca 2 points 5 months ago

I’ll throw in Bad Omens. THE DEATH OF PEACE OF MIND is great fuck music.

[-] harlatan@feddit.de 1 points 5 months ago

thx for the suggestions

[-] HelluvaKick@lemmy.world 10 points 5 months ago

Hyperpop is the new numetal

[-] mihnt@lemmy.world 8 points 5 months ago

Reading through these comments and the numetal wiki, it seems my idea of what numetal is and what the world considers numetal are two incredibly different things. The wiki has Glassjaw listed as a numetal band. Disagree 100% on that one. Spiritbox? That's progressive metalcore if anything. Sleep Token? lol, no.

Numetal seems to have taken on a very broad subgenre role. Which, from what I know of music, it should sit (as it is defined) as a genre that uses basic metal music fused with other genres. Meaning it's never over-complicated and songs are written more like pop songs in their structure and simplicity.

Using numetal as a catch-all for anything that's a fusion of two or more genres is a bit, um, disrespectful to bands who are a far cry from just playing in 4/4 all the time with the song structure of intro/verse/chorus/verse/chorus/breakdown/chorus/outro.

[-] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 2 points 5 months ago

Would you consider Babymetal as Nu?

[-] mihnt@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago

They could be considered that, yes. Personally? Not really. It's just different vocal stylings on top of some regular ol' metal music. I'm not exactly versed on their music though so take that with a grain of salt.

[-] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 2 points 5 months ago

Meaning it’s never over-complicated and songs are written more like pop songs in their structure and simplicity.

I was just asking because of this line

[-] mihnt@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago

Are you making a point? Sorry, not catching what, if anything, you are trying to say.

[-] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 1 points 5 months ago

I was stating why I was curious

[-] mihnt@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Apologies for being defensive. Yesterday...was a day.

Also, surprisingly difficult to talk about music nowadays after spending so much time on reddit. A lot of people were ruthless over there.

[-] OfficerBribe@lemm.ee 2 points 5 months ago

Here are 2 other resources to find new albums:

this post was submitted on 23 Jan 2024
71 points (90.8% liked)

Nostalgia

1276 readers
327 users here now

nostalgia noun nos·tal·gia nä-ˈstal-jə nə-, also nȯ-, nō-; nə-ˈstäl- 1: a wistful or excessively sentimental yearning for return to or of some past period or irrecoverable condition also : something that evokes nostalgia

Rules for Nostalgia Lemmy Community

1. Respectful Nostalgia Share nostalgic content and memories respectfully. Avoid offensive or insensitive references that may be hurtful to others.

2. Relevant Nostalgia Posts should focus on nostalgic content, including memories, media, and cultural references from the past. Stay on topic to preserve the nostalgic theme of the community.

3. Source Verification If you share nostalgic media or content, provide accurate sources or background information when possible.

4. No Spamming Avoid excessive posting of similar nostalgic topics to keep content diverse and engaging for all members.

5. Positive Discussions Encourage positive discussions and interactions related to nostalgic topics. Respect different viewpoints and memories shared by community members.

6. Quality Content Strive to post high-quality content that sparks nostalgia and meaningful conversations among members.

7. Moderation Guidelines

By adhering to these rules and guidelines, we can create a welcoming and enjoyable space to relive nostalgic moments together. If you have any questions or suggestions, feel free to reach out to the moderators. Thank you for sharing your nostalgia responsibly!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS