218
top 27 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] jecht360@lemmy.world 103 points 5 months ago

If purchasing something doesn't mean you own it, then piracy isn't theft.

[-] fubo@lemmy.world 69 points 5 months ago

If someone sells something to you and then takes it back later, that is theft.

[-] null@slrpnk.net 10 points 5 months ago

If you weren't allowed to back up a copy of it, you never owned it.

[-] Moonrise2473@feddit.it 34 points 5 months ago

This is huge and not like what happened last month.

Last month they removed access to "Deadly Dentists | Season 1" and similar shows that are also broadcasted 24/7 everywhere on TV, so not too many people "purchased" them.

But for anime the chance that a big fan is losing access to a massive collection of titles paid thousands of dollars is much higher.

Sony didn't learn from the backlash that happened less than two months ago?????

[-] neo@lemmy.comfysnug.space 11 points 5 months ago

They learned that the backlash was easily ignored, most likely.

[-] SupraMario@lemmy.world 6 points 5 months ago

I'm waiting for the class action lawsuit on this.

[-] CaptObvious@literature.cafe 2 points 5 months ago

Their TOS most likely forbids class action suits. It most likely requires individual or “small batch” arbitration that benefits Sony.

[-] SheeEttin@programming.dev 4 points 5 months ago

Only if you file suit and the court finds it enforceable. Sometimes they say you can sue anyway.

[-] CaptObvious@literature.cafe 0 points 5 months ago

I’m not aware of that ever happening. It may have, but every case that I’m aware of has ended quickly with the court enforcing the TOS that users “voluntarily” deciphered and agreed to.

[-] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 1 points 5 months ago

One clear example in the US is "warranty void if removed" stickers. It was found that "contract" violated consumer protection laws, so companies are required to prove the customer broke it in an attempt to repair it, instead of just proving the customer attempted to repair it.

[-] CaptObvious@literature.cafe 1 points 5 months ago

Provide the case? I’m very interested to see this.

[-] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 1 points 5 months ago

It's not a case, but action by the FTC. And here are settlements with three companies on similar grounds (conditioning warranties on the manner of repair).

[-] JoMiran@lemmy.ml 24 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

That image choice by Ars Technica was no coincidence.

[-] LarkinDePark@lemmygrad.ml 2 points 5 months ago

Don't get it.

[-] PoliticalCustard@lemmygrad.ml 14 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Piracy sites are now very often the best archive sites; if you are into old and/or obscure films very often your only choice is to go to piracy sites. Same used to be the case for music with what.cd - what an amazing musical archive that was. I still miss what.cd. Until corporations figure out a way to offer such archives, piracy will continue to grow as more and more content becomes unavailable because these corporate digital libraries are being taken away.

[-] knfrmity@lemmygrad.ml 4 points 5 months ago

Corporations will never offer such archives, as they're a money losing proposition. In some cases IP and copyright law is even such that content can't be realistically archived and provided.

[-] PoliticalCustard@lemmygrad.ml 2 points 5 months ago

Yeah, I think the same. Good news for piracy... but sad that people will have to rely on trackers that can disappear at any time and without warning. Mind you copyright does expire... but I have no idea how that would work. Project Gutenberg for media with large file sizes would be expensive to run... but then storage may continue to get cheaper. But yeah, it won't be a corporate that will be offering a solution.

[-] knfrmity@lemmygrad.ml 6 points 5 months ago

Copyright expires long after unprofitable content has been all but lost forever, something like 100 years after the death of the original creator. It used to be a far shorter period, but US corporations with big profitable IP holdings keep bribing lawmakers to extend it, and force its enforcement outside of the US as well. The concept of being able to sell copyrights is also quite silly if you ask me.

So unfortunate Gutenberg and similar libraries can only have really old stuff as things stand.

[-] astrsk@kbin.social 3 points 5 months ago

what.cd was the best.

[-] ksynwa@lemmygrad.ml 3 points 5 months ago

I still miss what.cd

Isn't there a site called redacted that is meant to replace it? I remember failing the interviews for it.

[-] PoliticalCustard@lemmygrad.ml 3 points 5 months ago

Yeah, weirdly enough I just found it after remembering how good what.cd was. I have seen that the interview asks about transcoding... so yeah... might have to do some learning 'fore I have a go at an interview. I guess if the bar to entry is high then that is probably a good thing. I think I only got into what.cd because I met someone who had an invite.

[-] ksynwa@lemmygrad.ml 3 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

I failed the interview because even though I got all the answers correct I had their interview prep page open in another tab and when they gave me the chance to come clean about it I lied instead 😬

[-] PoliticalCustard@lemmygrad.ml 3 points 5 months ago

You could try Orpheus, I managed to join today. It's even got a what.cd skin so you can pretend you're home again. https://interview.orpheus.network/

[-] ksynwa@lemmygrad.ml 2 points 5 months ago

Looks great. Thanks.

[-] PoliticalCustard@lemmygrad.ml 3 points 5 months ago

Oh no! That's good to know though, thank you. I will study a page a day and do the interview in a week or so, this will stress me out no end, I'm sure. 😅

[-] autotldr@lemmings.world 14 points 5 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


Funimation, a Sony-owned streaming service for anime, recently announced that subscribers' digital libraries on the platform will be unavailable after April 2.

For years, Funimation had been telling subscribers that they could keep streaming these digital copies of purchased movies and shows, but qualifying it: “forever, but there are some restrictions.”

But in addition to offering video streaming, Funimation also dubbed and released anime as physical media, and sometimes those DVDs or Blu-rays would feature a digital code.

For people lacking the space, resources, or interest in maintaining a library of physical media, this was a good way to preserve treasured shows and movies without spending more money.

It also provided a simple way to access purchased media online if you were, for example, away on a trip and had a hankering to watch some anime DVDs you bought.

Regarding refunds, Funimation's announcement directed customers to its support team "to see the available options based on your payment method," but there's no mention of getting money back from a DVD or Blu-ray that you might not have purchased had you known you couldn't stream it "forever."


The original article contains 420 words, the summary contains 186 words. Saved 56%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[-] 20inmyhead@lemmy.ml 7 points 5 months ago

Sony is shit for doing this, however if you buy streaming content thinking you’re going to have access to it forever you’re kidding yourself. Businesses will supply streaming content for as long as it’s profitable to do so. When that profit evaporates so does your content.

this post was submitted on 09 Feb 2024
218 points (97.0% liked)

Technology

33707 readers
148 users here now

This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.


Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.


Rules:

1: All Lemmy rules apply

2: Do not post low effort posts

3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff

4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.

5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)

6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist

7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS