171

Channel 4 Finds ‘No Evidence’ Of UNWRA-Hamas Links In Confidential Israeli Dossier (www.msn.com)

submitted 6 months ago by Deceptichum@kbin.social to c/world@lemmy.world

27 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Channel 4 News reports that it found “no evidence to support its explosive new claim” by Israel that employees of United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees (UNRWA) participated with Hamas in the October 7th attacks.

top 27 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[-] some_guy 57 points 6 months ago

Israel lies constantly. Fuck Israel.

[-] SpicyLizards@reddthat.com 31 points 6 months ago

What an unexpected surprise. So out of character for isreal to maliciously sabotage any Palestinian support..

[-] davepleasebehave@lemmy.world 13 points 6 months ago

it was also just after the ICJ findings. to move the news cycle. convenient.

[-] kibiz0r@midwest.social 10 points 6 months ago

The ICJ also rules that Israel must allow humanitarian aid in.

Next day: “Humanitarian aid is Hamas!”

[-] CityPop@lemmy.today 4 points 6 months ago

Hummus is humanitarian aid though. It's delicious and nutritious.

[-] doctorcrimson@lemmy.today 9 points 6 months ago

And throughout all of this, the UNWRA complied with Israel and asked for a full transparent investigation. But 9 nations still slashed 2/3rds of their budget in the midst of a massive humanitarian crisis.

[-] Facebones@reddthat.com 5 points 6 months ago

As was always the real goal.

[-] Passerby6497@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago

Oh wow, who could have seen that coming?? Literally anyone who paid a modicum of attention?

[+] SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca -8 points 6 months ago

According to the document, which has sparked international controversy, approximately 190 Hamas and Palestinian Islamic Jihad operatives were identified as UNRWA employees, based on “intelligence information, documents and identity cards” seized during military operations. However, the document stops short of providing concrete evidence to support its allegations.

Headline: There is no evidence!

Article. There is no evidence... other than the evidence that Hamas members had UN employee ID cards.

[-] Silentiea@lemm.ee 6 points 6 months ago

It sounds like the document says "We know some of these Hamas guys worked for UNWRA. We totally found, like IDs and shit. Definitely. Trust us on that."

However, the document stops short of providing concrete evidence to support its allegations.

The document claims they have evidence, but doesn't actually include any of it.

[-] doctorcrimson@lemmy.today 5 points 6 months ago

Technically if they had found the identity cards on Hamas then it would be considered evidence. That's not what it says, though. It says the identity cards were confiscated during Israeli Military Operations. Just like when Israel bombed a hospital filled with children and claimed it was a Hamas Base.

[+] SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca -8 points 6 months ago

So why not just say the truth? "We refuse to believe any evidence Israel provides on anything"?

Seems more honest and more efficient.

[-] doctorcrimson@lemmy.today 6 points 6 months ago

Pot calls the Kettle willfully ignorant. Pot claims Israel's word alone should be good enough to slaughter tens of thousands, leaving hundreds of thousands to starve.

You know why Israel can't provide the "Evidence" to the public? Because they've got nothing.

[-] SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca -5 points 6 months ago

You know why Israel can’t provide the “Evidence” to the public?

Because it would compromise intelligence sources? Countries don't share intelligence with anyone, only with other countries they trust. Those countries immediately stopped funding the UNWRA, despite the political cost of doing so.

Even the UN fired some people and launched a probe into it. Seems the UN doesn't think "they've got nothing."

[-] doctorcrimson@lemmy.today 4 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

The cited intelligence sources were literally armed troops confiscating items from occupied territory. Why would they need protection? From what? They're not hiding from anything.

Only 9 nations withdrew funding, the largest of which was the USA with roughly half the budget cuts total amount.

this post was submitted on 11 Feb 2024

171 points (92.5% liked)

World News

38147 readers

2369 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Rule 1: posts have the following requirements:
- Post news articles only
- Video links are NOT articles and will be removed.
- Title must match the article headline
- Not United States Internal News
- Recent (Past 30 Days)
- Screenshots/links to other social media sites (Twitter/X/Facebook/Youtube/reddit, etc.) are explicitly forbidden, as are link shorteners.
Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. The key points in 1-2 paragraphs is allowed (even encouraged!), but large segments of articles posted in the body will result in the post being removed. If you have to stop and think "Is this fair use?", it probably isn't. Archive links, especially the ones created on link submission, are absolutely allowed but those that avoid paywalls are not.
Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed. Sources that have a Low or Very Low factual reporting rating or MBFC Credibility Rating may be removed.
Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudiced.
Posts and comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service UPDATED AS OF 10/19
Rule 5: Keep it civil. It's OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It's NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, misinformation, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.
Rule 7: We didn't USED to need a rule about how many posts one could make in a day, then someone posted NINETEEN articles in a single day. Not comments, FULL ARTICLES. If you're posting more than say, 10 or so, consider going outside and touching grass. We reserve the right to limit over-posting so a single user does not dominate the front page.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world

Recommendations

How to spot Misinformation and Propaganda

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

Consider including the article’s mediabiasfactcheck.com/ link

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

quinten@lemmy.world

NewsAutoMod@lemmy.world

jordanlund@lemmy.world

Tenthrow@lemmy.world

little_cow@lemmy.world

lemmyAtom@lemmy.world

FlyingSquid@lemmy.world