40
submitted 5 months ago by Zerush@lemmy.ml to c/technology@lemmy.ml

The “revolutionary” air-breathing engine could, in theory, lift an aircraft from a runway to more than 30km (18.6 miles) into the stratosphere and continuously accelerate it to 16 times the speed of sound.

At this velocity, even the longest intercontinental flights could take just one or two hours while consuming less fuel compared with conventional jet engines.

(Read full article using https://www.removepaywall.com)

all 32 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Rosco@sh.itjust.works 48 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

I'll wait until other countries validate the findings, or until someone makes a working prototype, before getting excited. Seems like it's one of those "too good to be true" stories like the LK-99. Hype in tech and science almost always leads to disappointment.

[-] Norgur@kbin.social 36 points 5 months ago

Yeah, no. Just no. Absolutely no. Faster than everything else.and higher than everything else and all of that by burning less energy? Come on people, stop falling for this kind of crap.

[-] electricprism@lemmy.ml -5 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)
[-] huginn@feddit.it 36 points 5 months ago

This article is bullshit: they're reporting that a blueprint was made. No demonstration, no proof of it working.

Rotary detonation isn't a new concept and GE has demonstrated a rotary detonation scramjet for 0 - Mach 5.

https://www.geaerospace.com/press-release/other-news-information/ge-aerospace-demonstrates-hypersonic-dual-mode-ramjet-rotating

If you really think that 0 to Mach 16 is within reach with current technology RDEs I have a bridge to sell you.

Darpa has all the money of God and they've been throwing billions at the exact problem of rotary detonation. Everybody knows that detonation is more fuel efficient than deflagration and that turbine engines are holding jet aircraft back from hypersonic flight.

When they make a Mach 16 demonstrator I'll believe them. Until then I'm still very excited for the demonstrated and actual capabilities of RDE Scramjets.

[-] pastermil@sh.itjust.works 16 points 5 months ago

That's nice...

...when I see it in production.

[-] cmnybo@discuss.tchncs.de 16 points 5 months ago

If that engine actually works, it would be cool to see it on a space plane. Mach 16 is nearly 2/3rds of orbital velocity. If you could go that fast on an air breathing engine, you wouldn't need to carry nearly as much oxygen to get into LEO.

[-] jaybone@lemmy.world 14 points 5 months ago
[-] TexMexBazooka@lemm.ee 5 points 5 months ago
[-] master5o1@lemmy.nz 7 points 5 months ago

I imagine that theoretical speed could only be used for drone planes.

[-] tsonfeir@lemm.ee 22 points 5 months ago

You could ride on it, but you’d need a cowboy hat.

[-] kubica@kbin.social 7 points 5 months ago

If a space suit is needed, would the hat go inside or outside the suit?

[-] gaael@lemmy.world 5 points 5 months ago

Outside, why wear a hat if no one can see it ?

[-] Lath@kbin.social 4 points 5 months ago
[-] pelya@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago

That's why cowboy hats have folded brims.

[-] tsonfeir@lemm.ee 4 points 5 months ago

I imagine you would need a cowboy hat that would also supply oxygen.

[-] Ummdustry@sh.itjust.works 1 points 5 months ago

it pokes through like a space marines pony tail

[-] heluecht@pirati.ca 17 points 5 months ago

@Zerush @master5o1 Speed is not a problem. Acceleration is.

this post was submitted on 24 Feb 2024
40 points (67.5% liked)

Technology

34092 readers
221 users here now

This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.


Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.


Rules:

1: All Lemmy rules apply

2: Do not post low effort posts

3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff

4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.

5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)

6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist

7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS