351
On the other hand, the prospect of a second Trump presidency has the unintelligence community delighted.
And Russians
They're included in the community mentioned above due to recent performance.
load more comments
(1 replies)
Maybe they could do something
Nah, they only do something when there's a prospect of a socialist democracy rejecting American corporate interests... because the military industrial complex and entire intelligence apparatus is a tool of capitalism.
Corporations aka "the economy" = "national security"
load more comments
(4 replies)
Man, given what the intelligence agencies are known for, I don't exactly want them interfering in US elections.
Maybe just this once, as a treat
It starts as just a treat, then dessert, then it's the main course, and before you know it, it's three meals a day of spookocracy.
"once" lol
load more comments
(1 replies)
Trump, who already tried to revamp intelligence agencies during his first term, is likely to re-up those plans — and push even harder to replace people perceived as hostile to his political agenda with inexperienced loyalists, according to interviews with more than a dozen people who worked in his administration.
This is why fascism always fails despite all its posturing about being "strong". People in top positions are chosen for loyalty to the leader first and basic competence second. Then those people are turned against each other to make sure they never accumulate enough power under themselves to directly challenge the leader. This is exactly what happened to Nazi intelligence, and British intelligence ran circles around them.
It never works in the long run, but they can take down everything around them in the short to medium run.
Dan Carlin did a wonderful show about why the German army of WWI was much better than the Wehrmacht. And his argument can be summarized as “Do you really think Falkenhayn or Ludendorff would have tolerated Goering for 5 minutes before firing him on the spot?”
Cheeto Benito just outs intelligence assets on a whim, him being in charge makes us less safe in many ways. He is proof we are an unreliable ally.
yeah...the last 50 years wasn't the proof, no....Hey remember what happened to allies like Iraq and Afghanistan?
Where are the assassin-spies then? If they're so nervous... do something about it? We all know you can. NSA, if you're listening...
where are all the assassins…
History suggests they’re probably all Republican.
"if"
To everyone suggest he gets JFKd...
I bet you it's on the table. And the intelligence communities are weighing on how much of a martyr it'll make him/if it'll spark a civil war.
Just keep feeding him burgers until he chokes. No one would be the wiser.
Andrew Lloyd Webber should team up with Mike Judge to write the musical, Idiocracy Superstar.
Ok, then do something about it
Overthrow the government?
Maybe they should share some intelligence
The way I see it, if the Americans end up picking a president who ranked among the bottom 5 presidents of all times, it's their own fault for doing so and they should enjoy the consequences of that.
The issue is, that the rest of the World will also "enjoy" the consequences of that, because you can't just ignore 300 Million people...
load more comments
(2 replies)
Fairly certain the not-so-intelligent community is just cheering him on, though.
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 26 Feb 2024
351 points (97.6% liked)
politics
18129 readers
3705 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect!
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS