Behavior rules:
Posting rules:
NSFW: NSFW content is permitted but it must be tagged and have content warnings. Anything that doesn't adhere to this will be removed. Content warnings should be added like: [penis], [explicit description of sex]. Non-sexualized breasts of any gender are not considered inappropriate and therefore do not need to be blurred/tagged.
If you have any questions, feel free to contact us on our matrix channel or email.
Other 196's:
Aren't those eagles, who are also predators?
Edit: found a fun fact about owls:
Owls eat other animals, from small insects such as moths or beetles, to large birds, even as large as an Osprey.
Whatever type of birds these are (maybe whiteheads?) they are in for a rude awakening someday!
Yes, that's the point I believe. (:
Kinda makes you think
Is it because they’re bald, and we shouldn’t make fun of bald people?
Hmm, it would make more sense if they were a different type of bird, one thag might actually interact with mice instead of eating them. A bit redundant as is.
Oh well, 99/100 of Nathan Pyle's comics I love, so I'm okay that this one is a miss for me lol.
Indeed they are
I thought they were Seagulls and was confused.
If you've ever heard the call of an eagle it sounds a hell of a lot like a seagull
The fact that in a lot of media eagles are dubbed over because they don't sound "cool" enough makes me giggle every time I hear it
Here is an alternative Piped link(s):
Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.
I'm open-source; check me out at GitHub.
Seagulls are also predators. Not quite apex, but fairly high in the chain.
Seagulls are in a whole other league
Here is an alternative Piped link(s):
https://piped.video/Kqy9hxhUxK0?si=IXFl9KT9PJ4KP6nj
Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.
I'm open-source; check me out at GitHub.
Wouldn't that make more sense? Eagles wouldn't talk to mice, they'd eat them.
I think a songbird would have made sense since they share bird feeders with the mice lol
Let's reframe this a moment -
Wealthy person 1 "you ever go hungry?"
Wealthy person 2 "no, not at all"
Wealthy person 1 "I have no idea what that poor person was complaining about."
Interesting interpretation, Nathan Pyle doesn't usually do political comics though. I think this one is just supposed to be fun.
Nathan Pyle doesn't usually do political comics
For good reason lol. But still, not sure how someone could make this and not see something more in it.
That's apart of the joke, yes
Good comic.
In my first readthrough, I got Of course [he is]. Never bothered me.
What a great visualization. Sometimes it can be hard to relate to the issues others encounter, but that doesn't mean those things aren't problems just because you don't run into them.