36

Someone doesn't like these TikTok stories, so here's another one

top 17 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] TTimo@lemm.ee 13 points 5 months ago

Wouldn't Congress rather do something useful for a change.

[-] JonEFive@midwest.social 15 points 5 months ago

I love how the conversation is always "ban tiktok" and not "ban the specific practices that make TikTok problematic".

Don't want to upset the massive corporate overlords that run the US social media companies doing the exact same things.

[-] harderian729@lemmy.world 6 points 5 months ago

This guy gets it.

All the discussion around banning Tiktok is just so an American company can take its place.

Useful idiots and tools don't understand this, though.

[-] Aussiemandeus@aussie.zone 13 points 5 months ago

I hate what ticktock has done to the internet video environment.

I know vine probably started it, but i prefer long form entertainment not 15 second crappy skits.

So if tiktok goes away something else will replace it but maybe a week or two of better internet.

[-] youngGoku@lemmy.world 5 points 5 months ago

It really has diluted the quality of the entire Internet's video content.

Sure there are a few good things that come from tiktok (from what I've heard, I don't use the app), but overall I think the app is a net negative.

[-] autotldr@lemmings.world 3 points 5 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


Mike Gallagher, R-Wis., who was among the authors of the bipartisan bill, said other House members told him that their offices were flooded by calls from constituents issuing their support for TikTok.

The legislation comes roughly a year after TikTok CEO Shou Zi Chew testified before Congress about the app and its connection to the Chinese government.

TikTok has maintained that data from its U.S. users is stored in the United States and that the Chinese government has not access or control of the app.

The bill, which is being called the Protecting Americans from Foreign Adversary Controlled Applications Act, would give the president power, through entities like the FBI and other intelligence agencies, to identify certain social media apps as national security threats if they are deemed under the control of foreign adversaries, like China, Russia, Iran and North Korea.

In response to the bill, a TikTok spokesperson said “the government is attempting to strip 170 million Americans of their Constitutional right to free expression.

Bowman, who has 234,000 followers on TikTok, later told NBC News that he wants to see “comprehensive social media reform” and that he’s probably opposed to the legislation at this point.


The original article contains 526 words, the summary contains 197 words. Saved 63%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[-] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago

This bill passed out of house committee unanimously and is on its way to the floor.

[-] K3zi4@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago

As a non-american, I have suspicions about this whole anti-tiktok agenda that seems to be going on. I was against tiktok at first, and think it's awful for fuelling that addictive/dopamine social media system. But now that I have my interests firmly in it, i learn a lot about my hobbies from it nice and quickly. However, Instagram reels is the exact same model, is that up for banning too? The excuse of it being Chinese spyware over Meta's own homegrown US spyware is another aspect, however all these companies already have our data anyway...

Tinfoil hat, but I think this is entirely about media control. Nations are beginning to realise that they can no longer control narratives if the population can just go and see all the other perspectives online- if they can apply critical thinking and parse through whats real or fake. But most of the awful things happening in Gaza right now have been pushed by insta, tiktok, twitter, etc. The panic that the narrative can no longer be controlled on global political events like this is exactly why country leaders and politicians would be concerned.

[-] aubeynarf@lemmynsfw.com 2 points 5 months ago

Is the US blocking Insta, Twitter, Lemmy, Reddit, blogs, or any other source of Gaza news?

[-] harderian729@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago

Remember, anyone who is against Tiktok being legal just wants a US company to make their profits instead.

They are useful idiots without even realizing it.

[-] _number8_@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago

tiktok fucking sucks but banning the entire app for everyone is insane. this could induce a severe posting gap, causing the US to fall behind in important discourse and cultural relevance

[-] harderian729@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago

Agreed. Those downvoting you are useful idiots who don't realize there's a trade war going on between the US and China.

This is all an effort to look out for our respective rulers.

[-] echo64@lemmy.world -3 points 5 months ago

America's own great firewall is getting set up before our eyes. It's funny how America's distain for China just makes for an imitation.

[-] aubeynarf@lemmynsfw.com 4 points 5 months ago

False equivalence if I’ve ever seen it. Does the US currently do any systematic blocking? Compared to comprehensive firewalling and legal consequences for Chinese citizens.

[-] echo64@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago

Not until the tiktok block we're literally talking about

[-] Archlinuxforever@lemmy.3cm.us 1 points 5 months ago

It would be very hard for the US government to censor everything when all of the infrastructure is privately owned.

[-] harderian729@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago

No it wouldn't.

this post was submitted on 07 Mar 2024
36 points (87.5% liked)

politics

18601 readers
5086 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS