180
all 19 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] MegaUltraChicken@lemmy.world 71 points 8 months ago

He's absolutely right. To people paying attention the Democracy message probably resonates. Most people aren't paying that close of attention. They've been failed by the system we have set up. You just aren't going to get the results you want if your message to people who have been failed by the system is "save the system!"

[-] CluelessLemmyng 27 points 8 months ago

Yep. The winning strategy has been shown by democratic wins in purple states last November. Virginia was a very even race and the Dems took back the legislature without even mentioning threat to Democracy. The issues matter and the GOP has provided more than enough ammunition to point out why they're the wrong choice for those issues.

[-] BigMacHole@lemm.ee 20 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Republicans: You should be able to Rape your 10 year old Daughter! Biden: Democracy!
Republicans: You should be able to Starve Hungry Children!
Biden: Democracy!
Republicans: Let's eliminate Social Security!
Biden: Democracy!
Republicans: We sell TOP SECRET CLASSIFIED INFORMATION to our Enemies!
Biden: Democracy!

[-] njm1314@lemmy.world 18 points 8 months ago

Yeah I agree with that to a certain extent, however it's not like the two were unlinked. I mean one of Trump's plans is to destroy Medicare. Also to destroy the regular framework of our nation. How are things like cost of living, housing, and Healthcare not part of the whole threat to democracy thing? It's all the same fight.

[-] dudinax@programming.dev 11 points 8 months ago

Yes, and if we give up our democracy, we lose any power we have to address the other issues.

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 6 points 8 months ago

This argument would carry more weight if people thought those we elect were interested in actually addressing those issues.

[-] nondescripthandle@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 8 months ago

Medicare for all and legal weed has been polling at above or around 70% for a few years now. What we want doesn't translate into laws even with overwhelming support unless it also makes rich people richer. It's no secret why people don't trust their representative to represent them, because they don't.

[-] GluWu@lemm.ee 1 points 8 months ago

Didn't they put something in the constitution for that?

[-] AbouBenAdhem@lemmy.world 17 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

The message should be that those cost-of-living, housing and healthcare issues arise from the subversion of the democratic institutions responsible for addressing them—and that one of the motivations of those who threaten democracy is to produce that outcome.

[-] Diplomjodler@feddit.de 17 points 8 months ago

But that's way too complicated for the average shlub.

[-] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 4 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

It also doesn't help that rebuilding democratic institutions takes a long time, and people have rent due every month.

It's like telling someone their house is burning down that we're going to fix climate change so that won't happen anymore.

[-] Diplomjodler@feddit.de 1 points 8 months ago

Not destroying them any further would be a good start, though. And I get it that people have a lot of legitimate grievances with the current political system. But anybody who thinks that voting for Trump is in any way shape or form a solution for those is just deplorably stupid.

[-] whotookkarl@lemmy.world 3 points 8 months ago

Can't we just shoot a missile at it?

[-] PeepinGoodArgs@reddthat.com 7 points 8 months ago

Lol voters would rather live in a dictatorship with more problems then.

[-] xmunk@sh.itjust.works 5 points 8 months ago

I remain skeptical about how much of this is lipservice but... yea, 100% right on that point.

[-] autotldr@lemmings.world 3 points 8 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


Wes Moore, the governor of Maryland and campaign surrogate for Joe Biden, has warned of the limitations of an election message centred on the threat to democracy posed by Donald Trump.

In January the US president gave a rousing speech about the need to protect democratic institutions from Trump, now his rival in the 2024 election, and the Biden campaign has promised to put the issue front and centre.

Biden can point to an increase in housing inventory and measures that make it easier to build affordable housing, Moore argues, as well as a cap on insulin prices and steps to reinforce and expand the Affordable Care Act, which Trump has threatened to undermine.

Moore, 45, a Rhodes scholar and former paratrooper who saw combat in Afghanistan, is widely tipped as a potential future presidential candidate.

He insists that he is not thinking about such speculation but does intend to be a highly active surrogate for the Biden-Harris re-election campaign in the coming months.

The governor urged the grassroots “uncommitted” movement, which racked up tens of thousands of Democratic primary votes in Michigan and Minnesota in protest at Biden’s handling of the war in Gaza, to consider the potential perils of withholding their support in November.


The original article contains 552 words, the summary contains 206 words. Saved 63%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[-] someguy3@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

I agree. And Americans don't seem to understand inflation has been global and blame Biden.

(If any person has control over it, it's Putin with his invasion of Ukraine preventing crops being planted.)

[-] itsonlygeorge@reddthat.com -2 points 8 months ago

Yeah. Cause the president is in charge of all of those things.

this post was submitted on 21 Mar 2024
180 points (94.1% liked)

politics

19143 readers
2224 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS