393

Microsoft (MSFT.O) will sell its chat and video app Teams separately from its Office product globally, the U.S. tech giant said on Monday, six months after it unbundled the two products in Europe in a bid to avert a possible EU antitrust fine.

all 41 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] tsonfeir@lemm.ee 95 points 4 months ago

That will just make them more money as they can charge whatever they want for both

[-] BestBouclettes@jlai.lu 71 points 4 months ago

From Teams plus office 10 euros a month per user to Office alone 9 euros a month per user and Teams alone 5 euros a month per user.

Microsoft would never do that now, would they ?

[-] tsonfeir@lemm.ee 15 points 4 months ago

Never!!! 🤪

[-] Pzulu@lemmy.world 11 points 4 months ago

If we clearly have to pay for.something, instead of it being wrapped into a license of so many things, I will push for us to take Zoom.

It just works better.

Annotating on screen is worth it alone, instead of trying to talk the screen sharer to what part of the screen you want to talk about.

[-] atx_aquarian@lemmy.world 10 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

I want:

  • Zoom's...
    • ...annotation
    • ...richer reactions
  • Teams's...
    • sensible screen layout
    • richer chat content
    • chat continuity before/during/after meetings
    • very granularly customizable avatars
  • Some other tool's composition interface for chat text
[-] blackfire@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago

The annotation is a killer feature I don't why others haven't added it yet

[-] douglasg14b@lemmy.world 9 points 4 months ago

Pretty sure the only reason any org uses teams is because it's already bundled for free with office or Enterprise subscriptions.

[-] tsonfeir@lemm.ee 1 points 4 months ago
[-] lud@lemm.ee -1 points 4 months ago

Teams also have great integration with SharePoint which simplified administration and usage.

[-] exanime@lemmy.today 3 points 4 months ago

I'm completely biases because I cannot find a si gle redeemable feature of SharePoint.... Hence, anything that integrates with SharePoint is just worse by doing so

[-] Milk_Sheikh@lemm.ee 82 points 4 months ago

…now that the marketplace has been altered.

Zoom was disruptive in the market because the other options SUCKED - Skype, GotomyPC, WebEx, etc all did a lot of rapid maturing during the pandemic to catch up to Zoom, and this ‘bundling’ of Teams with Office has built user lock-in via Office 365.

Well played Microsoft, once again ducking a well deserved anti-trust suit. ‘Historic injury’ should count equally as ‘current injury’ for prosecution, arguably especially so if that historic injury is what created your current market share

[-] KingThrillgore@lemmy.ml 50 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

THEY ARE UNBUNDLING PRODUCTS?!!? WHAT THE FUCK IS THIS, APRIL FOOLS DAY?

[-] jdeath@lemm.ee 2 points 4 months ago

the two ways to increase profitability: bundling and unbundling

[-] anotherandrew@lemmy.mixdown.ca 45 points 4 months ago

Maybe businesses will stop forcing “free” Teams on their workforces now. What a pile of shit.

[-] NightAuthor@lemmy.world 31 points 4 months ago

I fucking hate teams, I swear every single day it iritatea me, and at least once a week I find something new I hate about it. This week, it keeps pinning my self-chat. Which I don’t use. If it lets me unpin it, it’ll end up pinned again within a couple of days.

[-] spacemanspiffy@lemmy.world 10 points 4 months ago

It is a huge source of frustration for me at work as well. It is slow, it has too many weird and ill-defined features shoved in, it is difficult to search, the WYSIWIG markdown features are fuckulated, it crashes regularly, there is too much wasted/negative space in the UI, and worst of all, it makes me sad in my heart.

[-] stockRot@lemmy.world 5 points 4 months ago

What's a better alternative? I was a big fan of Teams back when I worked with an org that used it

[-] frazorth@feddit.uk 15 points 4 months ago

How? It can't even handle copy/pasting text without fucking up the formatting.

Creating new SharePoint sites whenever you start a chat so that you have a whole new way to lose your documents?

Better alternative? Pretty much any other chat app.

[-] Benaaasaaas@lemmy.world 12 points 4 months ago

Slack and Mattermost

[-] anotherandrew@lemmy.mixdown.ca 7 points 4 months ago

Slack is my modern go-to, but I still also use IRC. Slack has great support for technical chat, doesn’t slow my i7 with 32GB RAM to a crawl, has great multiple account support and even voice chat if you are into that. I prefer zoom for video when I need it, but slack’s isn’t nearly as shit as teams.

[-] Gabu@lemmy.world 6 points 4 months ago

Honestly? Even Discord, a game chat app. Teams just sucks.

[-] melpomenesclevage@lemm.ee 3 points 4 months ago

Or matrix. Matrix is great.

[-] spacemanspiffy@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago

Honestly the standard way should be that organizations host their own Matrix server. Then they don't have to pay for enterprise Teams or whatever, and they control their data.

[-] ramble81@lemm.ee 38 points 4 months ago

They’ll still be rolled up in an E3 license so corporations won’t really notice the difference

[-] sgibson5150@slrpnk.net 12 points 4 months ago

Would you happen to have a source that you could link on that please? I've been trying to see if it affects us since I read the Ars Technica story this morning. We have been getting Teams historically with the Office 365 E3 license that comes with our Action Pack sub.

[-] ramble81@lemm.ee 15 points 4 months ago

Oh, it wasn’t a verified response, just one of those “well this is most likely how Microsoft will deal with it” things.

[-] sgibson5150@slrpnk.net 13 points 4 months ago

I suspect you're correct, but I'd like to see it in black and white. I wear a number of hats and one of them makes me answerable to questions like "Why has my Teams stopped working?"

[-] fatalicus@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago

If this works like how they did it here in Europe, where this change happened last year, then this won't affect existing tenants, other than also getting a standalone teams sku available.

On new tenants created after the change took effect however, there will be no sku with teams bundled available, only the standalone teams sku and teams less E3/E5 skus.

[-] sgibson5150@slrpnk.net 1 points 4 months ago

That makes sense. Thank you for replying. 👍

[-] panja@lemmy.world 25 points 4 months ago

I get it... But man Microsoft licensing was already a slog before this 😭

[-] billiam0202@lemmy.world 22 points 4 months ago

So uh... April Fools?

[-] masterofn001@lemmy.ca 15 points 4 months ago

When does google have to separate gmail (or is it workspace now) and hangouts, no, allo, no, duo, uh, I mean meet.

Maybe if ms just keeps changing the names of things all their woes will disappear!

this post was submitted on 01 Apr 2024
393 points (99.0% liked)

Technology

57226 readers
3876 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS