126
top 27 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] mindlight@lemm.ee 95 points 8 months ago
[-] RedditWanderer@lemmy.world 57 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Betteridge's law of headlines: "Any headline that ends in a question mark can be answered by the word no.

[-] MisterMoo@lemmy.world 7 points 8 months ago

What if the headline is “do you not like me?”

[-] cornshark@lemmy.world 8 points 8 months ago

Why would that be a headline?

[-] victorz@lemmy.world 5 points 8 months ago
[-] tedu@azorius.net 54 points 8 months ago

I am going to guess that Google will not be broken up right now.

[-] __init__@programming.dev 19 points 8 months ago

Betteridge’s law would agree with you.

[-] tabular@lemmy.world 16 points 8 months ago

If Google is broken up what changes? Are there going to two different companies creating a map app?

[-] psychothumbs@lemmy.world 28 points 8 months ago

The breakup this is referring to is splitting off the Android operating system from the rest of Google.

[-] AlternatePersonMan@lemmy.world 11 points 8 months ago

Not sure what changes, but it's scary how much Google controls. Even if we just broke off YouTube from them, that would be a big deal.

Ideally we would split their search engine, YouTube, and chrome each into two competing companies. (Google A, Google B, Chrome A, Chrome B, YouTube A, YouTube B)

Because Google has so much power they can make changes that will break search results, websites, and browsers if you don't accept changes that are beneficial to them.

[-] SaltySalamander@fedia.io 3 points 8 months ago

Without the rest of Google, Youtube doesn't exist, because it doesn't make any money and it costs a shitload of money to run.

Google's actual businesses aren't Android, or Chrome, or Youtube (not including Youtube TV). They're AdSense, Google Cloud, their hardware division, the Play Store, the aforementioned Youtube TV, etc. Those are the things that make Google money, and really the only things you could realistically split off from Google and expect to still exist in a year or two.

[-] teleprintme@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

This honestly seems pointless. Would be better off just not allowing google to own the property, even as a subsidiary. That would throw a wrench into too many aspects of society, so I don't actually see that happening.

[-] NoIWontPickAName@kbin.earth 2 points 8 months ago

What property?

[-] olicvb@lemmy.ca 9 points 8 months ago

Alphabet 2, Alphabet 3, Alphabet Final Final V3 ...

[-] Grangle1@lemm.ee 1 points 8 months ago

Yeah, I would bet that Alphabet would continue to own (or immediately buy) any separate split-off company Android becomes and there would be absolutely no meaningful change. 100% pointless.

[-] NegativeLookBehind@lemmy.world 13 points 8 months ago

What would we do without one of the pillars of corruption and surveillance in America? There’s no way Google gets broken up.

[-] Alpha71@lemmy.world 12 points 8 months ago

Best case scenario is Judge breaks up google which then goes to the Supreme court which will then overturn the ruling.

[-] podperson@lemm.ee 8 points 8 months ago

What's the offshoot going to be called, "Soup"? Not like Alphabet is operating any more as "separate organizations" than Google was previously. Nothing changes there.

[-] psychothumbs@lemmy.world 4 points 8 months ago

The offshoot running Android would hopefully just be called "Android"

[-] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 2 points 8 months ago

Yup, just like it was before Google bought it.

[-] autotldr@lemmings.world 2 points 8 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


This week’s monopoly round-up has lots of news, as usual, including some victories for the Antitrust Division, the government causing big health insurance stocks to tumble, and a privacy bill deal in Congress.

Over the last ten years, we’ve heard increasing criticism of ‘Big Tech’ – the handful of trillion-dollar giants that organize the information commons in our society – resulting in the Justice Department and Federal Trade Commission bringing sweeping antitrust lawsuits against Google, Microsoft, Meta, Amazon, and – most recently – Apple.

The answer to that question requires an understanding of the facts and evidence in the case itself, Google’s acquisition history, and the purpose of remedies to unfetter markets from anticompetitive conduct and restore competition where it was constrained.

Epic showed how Google forced agreements on smartphone manufacturers that required pre-installation and prominent placement of the Play Store on hundreds of millions of devices.

Such a remedy can be broad-based, anything from monetary damages to break-ups to creating internal compliance departments to voiding unlawful contracts to banning senior executives from the industry.

We’ll know Epic’s request soon enough, Google will file its own more limited proposal, and dueling economic experts will jump in another of Judge Donato’s “hot tubs” at the end of May.


The original article contains 2,345 words, the summary contains 207 words. Saved 91%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[-] Graz@feddit.de 1 points 8 months ago

That McCloud looks like the "smarter every day" guy with a mullet

this post was submitted on 12 Apr 2024
126 points (93.2% liked)

Technology

60086 readers
2338 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS