143
top 18 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 45 points 1 year ago

Those always raised my scam hackles, so I'm not surprised.

[-] GrayBackgroundMusic@lemm.ee 31 points 1 year ago

Adam Hays, who owned Red Rock before selling the franchise in 2021, said his sales representative did not observe that Casteel’s mother had any cognitive issues. He said HomeVestors demanded its franchises maintain a “strict standard of integrity and honesty.”

Utter bullshit. I'd bet they totally did and don't care in the slightest. A sale is a sale. Greed is greedy.

[-] Rayspekt@kbin.social 15 points 1 year ago

Can someone prvoide a TL;DR on what a "We buy ugly houses" is for non-US fedizens? The article isn't too detailed about this rather than that they're scamming people with bad deals.

[-] unconfirmedsourcesDOTgov 25 points 1 year ago

I'm not an expert, but I have family that operates within this industry, unaffiliated with the ugly homes organization.

Tl;dr The idea is that these companies buy homes that have fallen into a state of disrepair, fix them up so that they comply with modern building safety regulations, slap on a new coat of paint, then sell the property for a profit.

Since they don't fully investigate the issues that the home has before making an offer, they make offers that are wildly lower than most valuations would indicate, which leads to the reputation of being scammy. Sometimes there are structural issues that are extremely expensive to resolve and the project is barely profitable, but in other instances there is little repair work required, and they make a big profit. Lowballing every offer ensures that they can't lose, but also means that this is rarely a good option unless you are in serious financial straits.

[-] SheeEttin@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

No, I think that's about it. They pressure people into selling for less than what it's worth.

A lot of advertisements around town on bad signs or handmade ones taped up saying things like:

"We buy houses with CASH, Any Home, Any Condition"

Or

"Cheap House? Need Out? We Buy Bad Homes"

From what I can tell they're usually interested in buying up properties that are neglected or in bad neighborhoods, do the absolute minimum required to re-list or turn into a rental property (bare fucking minimum, and sometimes less). Apparently they're also really predatory according to the article and don't have a lot of scruples.

They offer shit deals to purchase ugly houses

[-] TokenBoomer@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago

Just one big pyramid scheme.

[-] doppelgangmember@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Yes, but in the shape of a pentagon

[-] WhiteOakBayou@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

I called these guys to sell my first house. I bought a fixer upper in a bad neighborhood and made it worse learning to fix things. When I decided I had learned enough I called We Buy Ugly Houses. The guy on the phone gave me a cash offer like 20ish% lower than what I got on the market. They called me back once and were kind of pushy. Seemed to me like people who would rip off someone then throw up their hands and say "Buyer beware." I went the traditional route. Took three months longer but got more money.

[-] blazera@kbin.social 0 points 1 year ago

Im coming out of this with no clue of what even happened. How are they being pressured? It's a house, what on earth could possibly get someone to sell a house they dont want to sell.

[-] snooggums@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

They pressured people who want to sell a house into shitty deals through nefarious practices.

[-] blazera@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago
[-] snooggums@kbin.social -4 points 1 year ago
[-] blazera@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago

I did. And now Im here asking the same question a third time, no closer to an answer of what they did to pressure this lady into agreeing to sell her house

this post was submitted on 02 Aug 2023
143 points (98.0% liked)

politics

19143 readers
2812 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS