this post was submitted on 06 Aug 2023
179 points (98.9% liked)

Map Enthusiasts

4211 readers
4 users here now

For the map enthused!

Rules:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
all 22 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] zksmk@sopuli.xyz 88 points 2 years ago (4 children)

Antineutrinos don't interact with almost anything. They're just a bunch of wimps. They're harmless. Neat for mapping nuclear reactors tho.

[–] shortwizard@lemm.ee 32 points 2 years ago (1 children)

informative but the name-calling was uncalled for

[–] hansl@lemmy.ml 17 points 2 years ago (1 children)

GenX scientists naming things. Was it a mistake? Maybe, but we’re having a laugh.

[–] IMongoose@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Sonic the hedgehog protein has entered the chat

[–] Nepenthe@kbin.social 6 points 2 years ago

We can't just talk about the sonic hedgehog protein and not mention that the first sonic inhibitor found was named Robotnikinin

[–] TeamAssimilation@infosec.pub 4 points 2 years ago

Nothing personnel scientist

[–] Lojcs@lemm.ee 22 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

How is the map data obtained?

Edit: Looked up the article. It seems they took known geological data and calculated the geo-antineutrino flux map based on measurements from detectors in Japan and Italy. Reactor antineutrinos are calculated from the international atomic energy agency data and assumptions on antineutrino rates.

In short, this is just a distance-from-nuclear reactors map

[–] Denvil@lemmy.one 12 points 2 years ago
[–] jonne@infosec.pub 20 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Could these be used to locate nuclear submarines and the like?

[–] Lojcs@lemm.ee 12 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

No. This is a map of estimated antineutrino rates generated from known data.

Data from a theoretical detector that can calculate where its detected neutrinos came from from could be compared to this to find anomalies, but we're not there yet

[–] zaplachi@lemmy.ca 8 points 2 years ago

Probably not, unless the military is hiding some next level tech.

For example, the current generation of detectors, nearly all of which weigh upwards of a ton, have to be placed within tens of meters of a reactor’s core—inside a facility’s fence.

https://physics.aps.org/articles/v13/36

[–] remer@lemmy.ml 10 points 2 years ago

Very cool. I can see my workplace on this map.