Does any progressive actually like West?
I'm a progressive. I like it when he debates a moron. He's good at making an argument, and he's not wrong about a lot of progressive issues.
But he strikes me as a diva more than a leader. He seems to want to be in the spotlight, and is willing to say something mildly unpopular with the most offensive spin possible. The only reason to do that is for attention. You won't convince people you're right with incendiary rhetoric, and it makes it much easier for conservatives and centrists to paint socialists as cranks.
He's like the anti-Walter Sobchak. He's not wrong, he's just an asshole. He's also often wrong, but that's not how the line goes. Would Libertarians like Walter if he ran for president? I dunno, libertarians are all cranks so maybe they would.
Anyway, I don't mind West running now to raise issues, but I wouldn't vote for him in this election and I don't know anyone else who will. He's not siphoning support from Biden, because any reasonable progressive is voting against Trump.
You'll note I said 'like' in favor of 'vote'... Obviously we need to be voting to defeat trump, and I doubt any credible progressive is going to be not recognizing that.
but can I ask who, if that wasn't an issue, would you like? Or maybe better way of saying it. If we had ranked choice or similar voting system... who'd be your first pick?
Bernie will always be my first pick as long as he isn't retired.
They didnt just screw Bernie. They screwed America
I'd vote for Bernie. I'd vote for AOC or Tlaib. I really like Cori Bush. Fetterman is my Senator, and I'll vote for him again even though I disagree with his stance on Israel. Really, I don't agree with anyone on Israel/Palestine, because that situation is far too nuanced to be expressed by a politician in an election year.
Also, if I had a pick, I would go with STAR voting. It's better than RCV in almost every way.
I think you just described Dave Chappelle.
Maybe, but I wouldn't call Chappelle a progressive.
As a person? He's a great guy and PHENOMENALLY intelligent. He did the "Philosopher's Commentary" on the Matrix films, which is worth a listen.
He shouldn't be running for President though. ;)
Last I looked he was on the ballot in 6 states? It's 5 months to election day, if you're racing to get on the ballot at this point, your campaign is over. Pack it up.
Progressives?
Progressives aren't the target demographic. Progressives were so horrified by Trump, they'll vote Biden, no question.
The target demographic are people who were too dumb to know what was going on during Trump's term.
Who do progressives like?
Good question. I think a large part of the problem is there's not a lot of progressive candidates getting out of the state level. Without party endorsements, it's hard to get to any kind of national recognition sufficient to be a candidate.
and lets be honest, the DNC has actively been squashing any attempt at developing candidates who aren't kowtowing to the status quo. even just being not-a-boomer is enough to make it hard.
Several of the people I've personally liked and thought were progressives turned out to be assholes.
I like Bernie. Warren. I can name a few others, but really don't know enough about them to say if I like them or not. and that's a large part of the problem. Even if we ignore the progressive label... outside of a small handful of people, nobody really has the name recognition. and at this point I assume that's intentional to keep candidates like Biden and Hilary... relevant.
Hillary isn’t relevant.
Hasn’t been for eight years.
I know nothing about the guy, but I just skimmed over about 30 minutes of this and I can't tell what the hell he's talking about. As far as I can tell he's just talking in a funny cadence and listing people he really likes and from time to time touching real lightly on the idea that America does bad things sometimes.
Contrast that with (I just picked a random video from Youtube) Fred Hampton talking for 5 minutes and making simple, coherent, powerful points (among them hilariously enough being "we gonna have to do more than talk.")
I'm not trying to sit in judgement of West just because I watched one talk and didn't get anything from it. But I watched one talk and I didn't get anything from it. Does anyone have like a little TL;DR on what Cornel West believes and wants to make happen in the country?
Cornel West is a Republican operative.
He's being assisted by Republican operatives, he is not HIMSELF a Republican operative.
https://newrepublic.com/post/182486/republican-operatives-cornel-west-ballot-north-carolina
it's flat out misinformation that should be removed.
The fact that there ARE Republican operatives involved in his candidacy makes it not "flat out misinformation".
It just needed the appropriate correction as to where the operatives are coming from.
I find it incredibly disingenuous for his campaign to say things like:
“not have any specific comments since we are not familiar with them or their affiliations.”
Source: https://newrepublic.com/post/182486/republican-operatives-cornel-west-ballot-north-carolina
You're runing for President, it's your JOB to be aware of who is working for you.
the op already makes it clear that it's discussing other people being Republican operatives. the comment to which you responded is spreading misinformation.
Misinformation would be if there were no Republican operatives at all.
In West's case, yes, there very much ARE operatives at work, and the campaign is choosing to ignore that fact.
So while West himself is not an operative, he is actively benefiting from the operatives working for his campaign and choosing not to do anything about it.
I wouldn't remove a comment saying "Trump is a Russian asset" for the same reason.
so the ban on misinformation isn't an objective rule, just something capriciously moderated.
It's not misinformation if it's mostly true.
it's a single clause. it's a simple sentence. and it's false.
If West refuses to remove the Republican operatives from his campaign, he's actively working with them.
There is not a lot of daylight between that and saying he's an operative himself.
Is he benefiting? Yes.
Is he aware of who is benefiting him? Yes.
Is he doing anything about it? No.
Substitute Trump and Russia.
Comment stands.
it's objectively false. it took you 50 words to do enough mental gymnastics to stick that landing. I can't wait til .world dies.
It is not "objectively false" if West continues directly working with Republican operatives.
If you want to support West, that's fine, but you need to recognize the reality of the situation.
it is false now, and I don't believe it's honest to say he's working with them now.
your capricious moderation will kill this community
Inb4, they plan to pose as third-party advocate.
I suspect West is running as a protest vote against both parties, with a series of principles around his run focusing less into a platform and more into statement for consideration. The dude is a brilliant community organizer and thinker, but not a politician at heart.
I assumed a lot of folks would perceive his run in this way.
With our current 2-Party system!? That's like voting yes and no for a tax increase...
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News