Just take a page out of the Republican playbook and ignore the subpoena 🤷
He can line up behind Kevin McCarthy, Jim Jordan, Scott Perry, Andy Biggs and Mo Brooks .
Sorry, new phone. Who dis?
blocks the number
I'm sure Garland is classier than me. I would just send back a piece of paper with the date Gym Jordan was issued the subpoena he ignored written on it, and nothing else.
If I'm being held in contempt by the likes of Mike Johnson, Gym Jordan, Beetlejuice, and Marjie The Gross-Looking, then I know I'm doing something right.
Seriously. I'd be holding an award ceremony for myself. Maybe as a fundraiser to be donated to their opponents.
I'm no fan of Merrick Garland for all of the obvious reasons, but while I wholeheartedly disagree with the way he's handled multiple things, none of them rise to the standards where impeachment or contempt of congress is warranted.
I genuinely fucking love Merrick Garland and it confounds me that people have an issue with him. There may be some hindsight 20/20 wishful thinking about making things magically happen faster, but the guy is genuinely trying and did everything by the book; and in doing so, he ensures his own actions don't jeopardize the trial outcomes.
Most of the criticism comes from people who know not a fucking thing about the legal system.
I think people forget Garland was denied an appointment to the SCOTUS by the GOP as a nominee by Obama.
Because he hasn’t released the unredacted Mueller Report, right?
. . . Right?
I already read it and he's exonerated.
-- Billy Barr
Sure thing Mr. Flintstone. Here’s your payment, in an assortment of human children of varying levels of aliveness. Your owners thank you.
Alternative headline: Meaningless vote in danger of being more meaningless
politics
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News