57
submitted 4 months ago by dogsnest@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world

The House is expected to vote Wednesday on a resolution to hold Attorney General Merrick Garland in contempt of Congress.

all 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] CaptainKickass@lemmy.world 42 points 4 months ago

Just take a page out of the Republican playbook and ignore the subpoena 🤷

[-] dogsnest@lemmy.world 22 points 4 months ago

He can line up behind Kevin McCarthy, Jim Jordan, Scott Perry, Andy Biggs and Mo Brooks .

[-] TransplantedSconie@lemm.ee 10 points 4 months ago

Sorry, new phone. Who dis?

blocks the number

[-] billiam0202@lemmy.world 27 points 4 months ago

I'm sure Garland is classier than me. I would just send back a piece of paper with the date Gym Jordan was issued the subpoena he ignored written on it, and nothing else.

[-] Nightwingdragon@lemmy.world 17 points 4 months ago

If I'm being held in contempt by the likes of Mike Johnson, Gym Jordan, Beetlejuice, and Marjie The Gross-Looking, then I know I'm doing something right.

Seriously. I'd be holding an award ceremony for myself. Maybe as a fundraiser to be donated to their opponents.

I'm no fan of Merrick Garland for all of the obvious reasons, but while I wholeheartedly disagree with the way he's handled multiple things, none of them rise to the standards where impeachment or contempt of congress is warranted.

[-] lennybird@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

I genuinely fucking love Merrick Garland and it confounds me that people have an issue with him. There may be some hindsight 20/20 wishful thinking about making things magically happen faster, but the guy is genuinely trying and did everything by the book; and in doing so, he ensures his own actions don't jeopardize the trial outcomes.

Most of the criticism comes from people who know not a fucking thing about the legal system.

I think people forget Garland was denied an appointment to the SCOTUS by the GOP as a nominee by Obama.

[-] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 16 points 4 months ago

Because he hasn’t released the unredacted Mueller Report, right?

. . . Right?

[-] dogsnest@lemmy.world 9 points 4 months ago

I already read it and he's exonerated.

-- Billy Barr

[-] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago

Sure thing Mr. Flintstone. Here’s your payment, in an assortment of human children of varying levels of aliveness. Your owners thank you.

[-] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 11 points 4 months ago

Alternative headline: Meaningless vote in danger of being more meaningless

this post was submitted on 12 Jun 2024
57 points (98.3% liked)

politics

19107 readers
3883 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS