16

"accidentally"

top 5 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Streetlights@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

Post Office shits itself whilst on life support.

[-] Aggravationstation@feddit.uk 6 points 1 month ago

Lol, did it have "Revenge list" at the the top crossed out?

[-] Two9A@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

This was on PM earlier, they were interviewing one of the named postmasters: she only found out about this leak when The Mail called for a quote.

As she said herself, there's accident and there's incompetence; this leans heavily to the latter.

[-] MrNesser@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

Oh look they broke gdpr

[-] autotldr@lemmings.world 2 points 1 month ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


The Post Office has launched an urgent investigation after it accidentally published the names and addresses of 555 postmasters prosecuted during the Horizon scandal.The company confirmed staff had shared personal details in a document on its website and said it had referred itself to data watchdog the Information Commissioner’s Office.One former sub-postmaster tweeted that the breach had caused "a great amount of upset, distress and anger" among colleagues.It comes as witnesses continue to give evidence at an inquiry into the Horizon IT scandal, which saw hundreds of sub-postmasters prosecuted for theft between 1999 and 2015 due to incorrect information from accounting software.

The data breach on Wednesday was first reported by the Daily Mail, external and led to an angry response from former sub-postmasters.

Former sub-postmaster Christopher Head tweeted the text of a letter, external he had written to Post Office chief executive Nick Read and chair Nigel Railton.He wrote: "As you can imagine this has caused a great amount of upset, distress and anger amongst those whose data is now within the public domain.

Wendy Buffrey said that the action could "destroy lives" because criminals could now target sub-postmasters who had received compensation.Ron Warmington, the forensic investigator whose firm Second Sight was brought in to probe the Horizon system in 2013, told the Mail it was “an extraordinary breach” of confidentiality and “another example of Post Office incompetence”.The leaked document contained the names of 555 former subpostmasters who sued the Post Office in 2017.In 2019, the firm agreed to pay them £58m in compensation, but much of the money went on legal fees.In a statement the Post Office said the document had been removed from its website.It said: “We are investigating as an urgent priority how it came to be published.

"Organisations need tell the watchdog about a data breach within 72 hours of becoming aware of it, if it poses "a risk to people’s rights and freedoms".

More than 900 sub-postmasters were prosecuted for stealing because of incorrect information from Horizon in what has been called the UK's most widespread miscarriage of justice.Many sub-postmasters went to prison for false accounting and theft, and many were financially ruined.After years of legal wrangling the government said in January that it would "swiftly exonerate and compensate" those affected.Two former bosses from Fujitsu, the company behind the Horizon IT system, denied knowing about issues with the system at the inquiry on Wednesday.


The original article contains 530 words, the summary contains 400 words. Saved 25%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

this post was submitted on 20 Jun 2024
16 points (100.0% liked)

United Kingdom

4002 readers
325 users here now

General community for news/discussion in the UK.

Less serious posts should go in !casualuk@feddit.uk or !andfinally@feddit.uk
More serious politics should go in !uk_politics@feddit.uk.

Try not to spam the same link to multiple feddit.uk communities.
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric news, and should be either a link to a reputable source, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread.

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS