Are they banning the Bible for sexually explicit content and violence?
Of course not, they learned from another state (Utah I think) that didn't make an exception for the Bible.
I read the article but didn't find the exception. What is it worded like?
2024 and we still have book bans
Well, we still have conservatives, so we still have oppression. One day, maybe we won't have conservatives. Then, we won't have oppression.
IMHO it’s the billionaires manufacturing consent via propaganda.
law requiring all reading be ‘developmentally appropriate’
I hate that I have to keep saying this, even to some people on Lemmy.
There are people who go to graduate school to get a degree which includes instruction on finding developmentally appropriate books for children. They spend a whole lot of money on their educations to do this as a profession.
They're called librarians.
If librarians can't be trusted like they suggest, they should call for an end to the job as an educated profession. Weirdly, they never do. I've never seen Moms for Liberty demand that the University of Illinois stop offering its library science degree.
If they were really serious about this issue, they'd tackle the problem of schools not getting the funding to hire people with library science degrees and going with someone with an education degree who they can pay less.
News
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.
Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.
7. No duplicate posts.
If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners.
The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.