17
submitted 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) by Skipper1402@lemmygrad.ml to c/asklemmygrad@lemmygrad.ml
top 6 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] TeezyZeezy@lemmygrad.ml 17 points 1 month ago

Given the political conditions of the US at the moment, fucked as the material ones are, I'm going to say adventurist. There would not be MASS support for that kind of thing in droves large enough to spark revolution.

Now, many folks would be in support of it, and it would likely radicalize people further/spur them to action. But again, the primary contradiction in the US today is not having a communist party leading the working class. Because a majority of people aren't in tune/don't know who these guerillas are, it would be framed as individual terrorist activities and swept under the public eye, no matter the effectiveness.

We aren't there yet, in my opinion. But give it time, trust.

[-] queermunist@lemmy.ml 15 points 1 month ago

Is it part of an organized political movement or is it just guys bein dudes with IEDs?

[-] cfgaussian@lemmygrad.ml 9 points 1 month ago

Depends. Are you getting caught?

[-] SadArtemis@lemmygrad.ml 6 points 1 month ago

I'd call it a heroic- but ultimately self-sacrificing act, which probably won't result in much change. The time will come- and I have infinite respect for those who decide to throw a wrench in the genocide machine- but I think it's better to choose our fights. Being a martyr shouldn't be the end goal.

[-] ghost_of_faso2@lemmygrad.ml 5 points 1 month ago

praxis if done non-violentely and you get away

this post was submitted on 01 Jul 2024
17 points (94.7% liked)

Ask Lemmygrad

749 readers
10 users here now

A place to ask questions of Lemmygrad's best and brightest

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS