266

I’m talking about this sort of thing. Like clearly I wouldn’t want someone to see that on my phone in the office or when I’m sat on a bus.

However there seems be a lot of these that aren’t filtered out by nsfw settings, when a similar picture of a woman would be, so it seems this is a deliberate feature I might not be understanding.

Discuss.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] EnderMB@lemmy.world 27 points 6 days ago

Yes.

The tag is Not Safe For Work. I'd say that if you were to look at this in most work places you'd probably be speaking to HR within the hour...

[-] irotsoma@lemmy.world 14 points 6 days ago

Yes. Problem is that NSFW has lost its original meaning to a lot of people. NSFW was originally to hide things that might be controversial to be visible on your screen in a workplace, so it should be fairly conservative. Beachwear would 100% not be safe to look at in a work environment.

But now a lot of places are using it to determine what is safe to look at not in front of your boss, but in front of your kids or in public. That is a much different thing. NSFW flags should not be used to restrict kids from seeing it, just your boss. There needs to be a separate flag for hiding things from kids. And because social norms are different in different societies, there should be even more granularity in the flags. Nudity is just one thing that is NSFW.

NSFW should be reserved for blocking things that I don't want to suddenly appear on my screen when I'm browsing the Internet on my break at work when I'm allowed to browse the Internet, but it wouldn't be good for a naked picture to show up on my screen suddenly.

[-] Moneo@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago
[-] ArmokGoB@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 6 days ago

Yes. All academic points aside, it's not socially-acceptable to view stuff like this in public.

[-] Alatain@lemmy.world 9 points 6 days ago

I would have no problem if that popped up in my feed while I was in a public place.

That said, I don't think it would be safe for work, so the nsfw would apply. But I would not be browsing Lemmy at work either.

[-] TheFin@leminal.space 10 points 1 week ago
[-] Veneroso@lemmy.world 9 points 6 days ago

Having looked at your referenced image. No. She is appropriately clothed for summer.

In certain states in the US, a woman can choose to be topless anywhere a man can be. This woman is not topless.

Also maybe not visit Lemmy or any social media at work.

As far as on the bus? I guarantee that there's a woman on the bus in similar atire off it's summer.

[-] Urist@lemmy.ml 4 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Also, Americans are usually more prude, especially when it comes to the female body, than what is healthy (I understand that you would not want to make an attempt at social change starting in the workplace though).

[-] cley_faye@lemmy.world 7 points 6 days ago

Probably yes. As long as it's something that would reasonably not be ok to watch in public/family/work environment, it's always better to be on the cautious side.

There's a setting to just not blur NSFW tagged content, for people that are not concerned.

[-] FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today 5 points 6 days ago

I would personally adhere to US Beachwear rules unless mods specify otherwise.

  1. No nipples, exceptions being for explicitly male, of photographs of cultures that generally do not cover breasts, or certain artistic or medical references.

  2. No pubic region that reveals any genitalia or anus.

  3. There is no third rule, literally anything goes, including the image you were wondering about.

So while some people might object to a lot of the content we see, I don't personally think it is problematic. Especially when your instance has images collapsed by default, except for thumbnails.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Sam_Bass@lemmy.world 5 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

If you want to start your path down the reddit rabbit hole, yeah. Else, no

[-] yamanii@lemmy.world 3 points 6 days ago

There is no social media that would consider summer clothes NSFW, you are taking it too seriously, it just means "not porn".

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 06 Jul 2024
266 points (85.0% liked)

Ask Lemmy

25318 readers
820 users here now

A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions


Rules: (interactive)


1) Be nice and; have funDoxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them


2) All posts must end with a '?'This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?


3) No spamPlease do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.


4) NSFW is okay, within reasonJust remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either !asklemmyafterdark@lemmy.world or !asklemmynsfw@lemmynsfw.com. NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].


5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions. If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email info@lemmy.world. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.


Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.

Partnered Communities:

Tech Support

No Stupid Questions

You Should Know

Reddit

Jokes

Ask Ouija


Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS