202
submitted 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) by Andromxda@lemmy.dbzer0.com to c/technology@beehaw.org
top 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] boonhet@lemm.ee 66 points 1 month ago
[-] Pechente@feddit.org 57 points 1 month ago

Probably already installed. That would at least explain the high resource usage of chrome

[-] AlexWIWA@lemmy.ml 44 points 1 month ago

I'm willing to be we'll see something to train language models on the user's hardware soon enough. Folding at home, but instead of helping science, Google steals your electricity.

[-] vvv@programming.dev 14 points 1 month ago

I really think that's the secret end game behind all the AI stuff in both Windows and MacOS. MS account required to use it. (anyone know if you need to be signed in to apple ID for apple ai?) "on device" inference that sometimes will reach out to the cloud. when it feels like it. maybe sometimes the cloud will reach out to you and ask your cpu to help out with training.

that, and better local content analysis. "no we aren't sending everything the microphone picks up to our servers, of course not. just the transcript that your local stt model made of it, you won't even notice the bandwidth!)"

[-] zqwzzle@lemmy.ca 25 points 1 month ago

The shitty reboot of Office Space where some low level Google employee realizes they can stick a crypto miner in every browser and generate a couple cents from everyone’s browser.

[-] Tolookah@discuss.tchncs.de 16 points 1 month ago

G Suite Space?

[-] abbadon420@lemm.ee 13 points 1 month ago

Here's the plan. You write an extension for chrome that makes chrome think all traffic from [cryptominingcentral.com] is actually from *.google.com. Make folks install the plugin via the tried and tested methods like phishing. ... profit

[-] authorinthedark 13 points 1 month ago

couldn't you do that anyway if you can get people to install an extension? taking advantage of this for crypto mining purposes feels like extra steps

[-] Hirom@beehaw.org 7 points 1 month ago

Cannot reproduce on chromium. Has anyone reproduced it?

[-] BlueEther@no.lastname.nz 14 points 1 month ago

yeah:

{
  "value": {
    "archName": "arm64",
    "features": [],
    "modelName": "Apple M2",
    "numOfProcessors": 8,
    "processors": [
      {
        "usage": {
          "idle": 10841460,
          "kernel": 611796,
          "total": 13342920,
          "user": 1889664
        }
      },...
[-] Andromxda@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 1 month ago

Did you use normal chromium or Ungoogled Chromium? I tried it on the Arc Browser (which is based on Chromium), and it worked, but it didn't work on Ungoogled Chromium.

[-] Hirom@beehaw.org 4 points 1 month ago

Neither. I use a chromium package from my linux distribution.

It has many patches on top of the upstream chromium. That probably explain why that unwanted feature isn't there.

This issue appear on Google Chrome for Windows on my other machine. Just uninstalled it, never used it anyway.

[-] jherazob@beehaw.org 8 points 1 month ago

Reproduced here, Chromium on Linux Mint desktop. You need to have open a Google.com site for it to work though.

this post was submitted on 09 Jul 2024
202 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37443 readers
540 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS