28
submitted 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) by mecfs@lemmy.world to c/space@lemmy.world

Will it be able to compete at all costs wise, given its lack of reusability?

BBC mentioned it would probably be a decade before the ESA reaches that sort of technology.

Sorry for dumb question I haven’t been following space stuff at all. But I read a couple articles on yesterdays launch and was interested.

top 10 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Tar_alcaran@sh.itjust.works 21 points 1 month ago

Having the strategic capabilities to access space without having to rely on a far-right billionaire who is a big supporter of the person commiting genocide in Ukraine right now.

[-] plactagonic@sopuli.xyz 18 points 1 month ago

Niche of political points.

It is mainly "we can do it too" project now. There are lots of subcontractors, jobs and research put in to it but it won't be price competitive any time soon. It is similar to SLS programe.

[-] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago

I don't think it will have any market outside of European government contracts.

[-] troyunrau@lemmy.ca 10 points 1 month ago

I suspect, for very large constellation projects or similar, which would be adversely affected by a launch provider abruptly stopping launches for any reason, they might want to buy a few launches for redundancy purposes -- just risk mitigation.

I mean operators that aren't Starlink, in this case.

[-] HootinNHollerin@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago

One day Musk will completely lose his mind beyond his current level of having lost his mind

[-] threelonmusketeers@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

While I agree with you that this is possible, I don't think Ariane 6 is in any position to replace Falcon 9.

[-] kokesh@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I think the only niche will be stubborn European governments.

[-] mecfs@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago

I mean in any case it’s good to have a backup to not have to rely on someone as uhh… unfavourable and unpredictable as Musk, but that’s disappointing to hear.

[-] mercano@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago

Yeah, unfortunately, SpaceX is streets ahead of anyone else in the launch industry in terms of reusability and, in turn, price. In a purely capitalistic system, they’d be putting everyone else out of business, but the US government wants a second source vendor, so ULA stays around, and foreign governments want independent access to space, for a combination of national security and pride, so the Russian, Chinese, Indian, and European space agencies keep on trucking.

[-] pennomi@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

I suspect in 10 years or so that’ll change. There are lots of new space companies, it just takes a long time to build a new rocket.

this post was submitted on 10 Jul 2024
28 points (96.7% liked)

Space

8326 readers
21 users here now

Share & discuss informative content on: Astrophysics, Cosmology, Space Exploration, Planetary Science and Astrobiology.


Rules

  1. Be respectful and inclusive.
  2. No harassment, hate speech, or trolling.
  3. Engage in constructive discussions.
  4. Share relevant content.
  5. Follow guidelines and moderators' instructions.
  6. Use appropriate language and tone.
  7. Report violations.
  8. Foster a continuous learning environment.

Picture of the Day

The Busy Center of the Lagoon Nebula


Related Communities

🔭 Science

🚀 Engineering

🌌 Art and Photography


Other Cool Links

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS