45
submitted 4 months ago by girlfreddy@lemmy.ca to c/news@lemmy.world

Even before the most basic details of the shooting at Donald Trump’s Pennsylvania rally yesterday had emerged, the ceaseless, grating background noise of American political life had cranked itself up once again.

You might imagine that a possible assassination of a leading presidential candidate would be a scared-straight moment for a nation that has been sleepwalking into a culture of political contempt, delegitimization and tribalism. But before anything, it was right back to reflexive criticism of the media, vitriol for the other side and conspiracy theories.

The shock: Someone was apparently able to take multiple shots at a former president of the United States, protected by a phalanx of Secret Service and surrounded by a throng of citizens.

The non-shock: Yet another person in the United States was apparently willing to engage in potentially lethal violence in the arena of politics, the latest in a sorry trail that has menaced elected officials, judges, civilians, the Capitol and now a leading presidential candidate.

top 10 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] pubquiz@lemmy.world 52 points 4 months ago

The terms trending on X included:>

Using a fundamentally biased and un-moderated platform as a source of news is lazy, unprofessional and gratuitous. Do better.

[-] Audacious@sh.itjust.works 11 points 4 months ago

Hated when news articles would take one person''s tweet, even before musk took over, and use that as a basis of a group of peoples opinions. Terrible journalism, as you have described.

[-] gAlienLifeform@lemmy.world 44 points 4 months ago

Democratic politicians: condemn political violence of any kind

Republican politicians: immediately blame media and democratic party, howls for violent revenge, etc.

Some rando on social media: the shooting was a false flag!

Politico: All of America is responsible for this

[-] leftzero@lemmynsfw.com 31 points 4 months ago
[-] Etterra@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago

Well I mean I I'd assumed that it was a disgruntled MAGA-head The second I read the original headline last night. Today's news just prove me right. Again. Getting really tired of that happening.

[-] azimir@lemmy.ml 22 points 4 months ago

I really don't care much about the assassination attempt. It's a natural outcome of putting more guns into a population, stirring up hatred, and then putting everyone in a financial pressure cooker. I'm surprised that we didn't see something similar earlier than this, aside from the attack on Mr. Pelosi and some other lower profile attacks (at least the ones we found out about due to many being foiled by FBI and other agencies).

The right wing media bubble and GOP politicians have been fomenting this for years..It was done to both build a lone wolf stochastic terrorist pool and to build out the mob that attacked the US Congress on Jan 6th. The attack just happened to turn against them this time.

[-] TheDemonBuer@lemmy.world 13 points 4 months ago

You might imagine that a possible assassination of a leading presidential candidate would be a scared-straight moment for a nation that has been sleepwalking into a culture of political contempt, delegitimization and tribalism.

Was this written by AI? It sounds like someone who's never met a human being before. Humans are tribal by our nature. It's a fundamental part of how we have evolved as a species. That fact doesn't change just because you choose to ignore it, or pretend it doesn't exist.

this post was submitted on 14 Jul 2024
45 points (74.2% liked)

News

23329 readers
3850 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS