Based on some other link posts I've seen on Beehaw, I'd thought this was already the expectation. 🤭

Good thing to point out and intentionally encourage, regardless.

The risk is that the TLDR could be editorialized. The summary that Lemmy automatically inserts from the website should be enough for this purpose.

I really think we should push for people to read the actual article themselves, rather than encouraging or enabling the intellectual laziness that plagues social media. We're better than that.

I think that instead, quotes from the article itself should be posted as the text. Leave any further editorializing to a comment.

This will encourage engaging with the actual content of the article, rather than just making some extremely biased, misinformed, or otherwise improper, tldr, and gives a better opportunity for interacting with the editorializing directly via comments.

Nice point, I'll update my recent post in this community to include a tldr

While I agree, lemmy seems to generate a short description of the linked URL by itself which is already very useful.

This would work especially well for sites that choose to use clickbaity headlines like “Is this the year of Linux on the desktop?”. On reddit that would inevitably end up with lots of “No” posts from people who hadn’t even thought of clicking on the link.

It’s nice to see you worrying about how to combat the spammers already too 😀

It'd be great to stop clickbait in it's tracks here. I love the auto title, a great feature would be an "Auto description", similar to the autotldr bot we had on Reddit. Would automatically fill out the description based on the relevant points

I always liked Metafilter's "Front Page Post" where the text body included many more links and information about the subject. (I have linked here to what I consider a particularly well done example) They often also include links to previous discussions about the same subject.

I think there's some quality writers out there and some people doing really good research (and I'm not just talking about DD in /r/Superstonk), and having additional information is of great service to deeper discussion. Otherwise half of the discussion can be unknowingly a retread of very well-worn ideas. That's less likely to happen the more information is added.

I like the idea of a TL;DR at the beginning of a post, but I also like the idea of additional links and information "below the jump" as the beanplaters at MeFi say. This allows the best of both worlds, a quick rundown as well as more information for those who wish to view it.

This might be really useful for communities that require submission statements with linked articles. It would be harder to forget to add one as a comment and moderating the requirement should be easier with submission statements in the post itself, as well as making it easier for readers to see it (in plenty of subreddits the submission statement gets pushed down so if they don't have an automod comment pinned with a copy of the comment you have to go searching for it)

I’m failing to see how this is really any different from either Twitter or Reddit, where you would be expected to post some relevant information along with a URL

One great feature I see no one talking about is that we can write our own text when posting links

Since I'm new here (fleeing from reddit), I'm not sure what precisely you mean in technical terms. How to use that feature? Or is it just that we can add text along the link, unrelated to any syntax?

We should try to make it a habit to write the main point(s) that the article is making to avoid misinformation and ragebait titles. Ideally, a post without any text backing the article would become a red flag that it’s posted by some bot or mass spammer, and would not be floated to the front page.

Yes, I consider this best practice.