More data rot. I wonder how many millions of links are about to disappear.
I really hope nobody used shortened links in href attributes. That would be stupid.
Don’t worry. There’s a high chance at least one critical software has a shortened link somewhere in their infrastructure.
But, that's what I am worried about.
oh, god! quick! somebody contact boeing!
I wouldn't be surprised if there's some service that gave out shortened links by default and people just used those everywhere. Lots of people are clueless about how URLs work, and authoring HTML often means filling in a form.
authoring HTML often means filling in a form.
What, like, DreamWeaver style? Sounds cray-cray to me (as a web developer).
I'm thinking more like using a CMS or Wordpress by people who don't consider themselves developers.
Ah, right. Yeah...
On this planet, it seems that there is nothing so stupid that you won't find someone doing it, alas.
You know it to be true. This is the way.
as if millions of ~~voices~~ ~~links~~ voices cried out in terror and were suddenly silenced. I fear something terrible has happened.
Every month Google reminds us not to depend on their services.
I skim this page every time it is posted, but this time scrolling the whole length of it even as fast as I can gave me depression. 295 projects, almost half of them killed in the last 5 years.
I don't think any other company is based on trial and error to the same degree as Google.
It's kind of funny, since Google was originally based on hiring the greatest capacities within their field. So you should think they were pretty smart.
But trial and error is actually the LEAST INTELLIGENT method to solve a problem.
I think they’re mostly doing it to get the attention of investors. New products are exciting. It shows the company is growing.
Look at our new self driving car we will definitely release within the next year! Or how about these stupid looking glasses?
But now investors have become more concerned about profitability, so most tech companies are focusing on cutting the costs.
A combination of browser settings and exceptionally rare usage of short link providers - as creator or user - means I'm not completely sure about this, but ... were they putting ads on the short links somehow?
Because I figure if they weren't they should have tried that.
And if they were, how expensive is running a short link service anyway? This feels like rummaging around in the sofa for loose change. Smacks of desperation.
I suspect that they build a profile of what websites you visit and sell that data for targeted advertising.
Who could have foreseen this
So goo.le no longer work ?
Yes. Massive link rot incoming
goo.gle will continue to work beyond 2025
goo.gl will not
I've only ever seen goog.le looks used in spam and phishing emails, so I'm not particularly sad about this
Of course, there's roughly eighty million other folks who think they've each done a short link provider better, somehow, so this won't make much of a difference beyond not relying on the bots at Google to deal with abuse problems.
They have one? I just use tinyurl.
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
