397
submitted 2 months ago by silence7@slrpnk.net to c/politics@lemmy.world
all 36 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] fahfahfahfah@lemmy.billiam.net 138 points 2 months ago

“Man, I sure have some great memories on this thing” -Trump, probably

[-] dogsnest@lemmy.world 38 points 2 months ago

"My custom white gloves are on the top shelf, where they keep the PenIs Butter"

-- DJT

[-] cheese_greater@lemmy.world 7 points 2 months ago

Take me home, foreign-agent-road

[-] TransplantedSconie@lemm.ee 44 points 2 months ago

Lmao. Come on.....no way.....

checks if it's The Onion

Lmao!!

Sweet Jesus this motherfucker is a peice of work.

[-] crawancon@lemm.ee 34 points 2 months ago

WHAT KINDA COUCHES DOES IT HAVE?

—JD Vance yelling, probably

[-] silence7@slrpnk.net 25 points 2 months ago
[-] crawancon@lemm.ee 41 points 2 months ago

(Heavy breathing )

twi... twi-twi-twins?

[-] InternetUser2012@lemmy.today 7 points 2 months ago

"stop, my dick can only get so hard" - couch fucking cross dressing, boot licking Vance

[-] dogsnest@lemmy.world 24 points 2 months ago

Serendipity or Schadenfreude?

[-] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago

Sounds like a husband and wife pair at a kink fest.

[-] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 15 points 2 months ago

Somebody has a sense of humor. There's no way the Trump team would have thought to look into this so this is the leasing entity being cheeky. But, it was probably just a matter of the plane being ready.

[-] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 8 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Records indicate that an aviation company, according to Reddit user u/shiruken, bought the plane from an LLC linked to Epstein in February 2021

Shouldn’t the journalist at least verify these claims before publishing an article?

How the fuck is a reddit user a source?

[-] silence7@slrpnk.net 22 points 2 months ago

Because the reddit user linked to a set of reliable sources for everything except the photo of the jet showing its tail number and use by the Trump campaign (which they provided)

The journalist then discovered that a local news outlet had published a photo of the same jet including tail number being used by the Trump campaign, so they had the full chain of evidence without depending on a reddit user's say-so.

[-] NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world 8 points 2 months ago

What's the point of this article?

[-] Linktank@lemmy.today 51 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Probably to continue pointing out what a pedophile rapist tRump is. If I had to guess.

Edit: Oh, oh! And by extension how gross and weird everybody is who defends him!

[-] dogsnest@lemmy.world 32 points 2 months ago

"Trump's jet malfunctioned—its replacement appears to have been owned by Jeffrey Epstein"

I typed this one in Braille.

[-] FiremanEdsRevenge@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago

Reading the article helps.

[-] JimSamtanko@lemm.ee 7 points 2 months ago

At least there’ll be familiarity.

[-] xc2215x@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago

Wow. That is wild.

[-] ZagamTheVile@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago

It's not like Jeff was using it anymore.

[-] MyOpinion@lemm.ee 5 points 2 months ago

Yet another fantastic choice by this weirdo.

[-] Adderbox76@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 months ago

In his defence, it was a really good price. They gave him the black-light special pricing.

50% off if you promise to never shine a black light in there.

[-] Blackout@kbin.run 2 points 2 months ago

Everybody got one on their 10th visit.

[-] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world -4 points 2 months ago

“According to reddit user /u/blyatcorp” - okay stop.

I need a news story to not have random redditors as the only source.

[-] silence7@slrpnk.net 16 points 2 months ago

That's why they included the links that person provided, which document the historical ownership of the plane.

[-] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world -2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

~~Fair, but two things:~~

~~* “The origins of the photo aren’t exactly clear. According to u/shiruken, the photo was first posted by the redditor u/ChuckBarley. Neither account responded to inquiries sent by the Daily Dot.” is still the problem as “the photo” is the linking evidence~~ ~~* All of the info was copy/pasted. The author could have referenced their own search, and it’d be easy to do but they didn’t.~~

~~Which isn’t to say it isn’t believable, it is, just that it’s conjecture because they ran the story without verifying it.~~

Edit: looks like they ‘confirmed’ it via an Xitter account, which - is something? I guess?

[-] Boddhisatva@lemmy.world 13 points 2 months ago

It's not the only source. That was the person who noticed it and made the connection. The authors then did their own investigation and confirmed that it was true.

The Air Current, an outlet that provides, according to its X bio, “data-driven reporting & analysis on the business, technology, and strategy of flying,” stated on Monday that it confirmed that Epstein previously owned the plane used by Trump.

[-] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

Ah okay, thank you. I wonder if that was an update to the story - that was all I was looking for.

It’s still hinging on a social media account (The Air Current) but it’s corroboration at least.

[-] silence7@slrpnk.net 4 points 2 months ago

I don't think it is; the one that that account had that wasn't initially sourced elsewhere was a photo of the plane tying it to the Trump campaign and showing the tail number. Per the article local news subsequently posted such a photo

[-] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

Gotta admit, the plane in the local news pic? Pretty pedo-y. Like the jet equivalent of a cargo van with “Free Candy” spray painted on it.

[-] bamboo@lemmy.blahaj.zone 13 points 2 months ago

The sources are all public information:

This aircraft’s old designation was N212JE (note the matching serial number) and was previously owned by Jeffrey Epstein (note the last two letters of the tail number),” they wrote. “The registration history shows it was owned by Epstein’s Plan D, LLC in the U.S. Virgin Islands before being transferred to N550GP, LLC in February 2021. The tail number was subsequently changed to N550GP in July 2021.

this post was submitted on 12 Aug 2024
397 points (96.5% liked)

politics

19145 readers
4637 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS