206
top 25 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] deegeese@sopuli.xyz 84 points 2 months ago

If you ever wake up with a bat in your room, get a rabies shot ASAP.

[-] MegaUltraChicken@lemmy.world 46 points 2 months ago

And if you don't know why, look up what happens to humans with untreated rabies. It's virtually untreatable and one of the worst possible ways you can go.

[-] piecat@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

A shot to the genitals twice a day for a year would still be better than rabies.

[-] twistypencil@lemmy.world 18 points 2 months ago

Agreed, people will say you are stupid, but they will regret that when you are dead

[-] its_prolly_fine@sh.itjust.works 31 points 2 months ago

I have never heard someone called stupid for getting a rabies vaccine when the animal could not be tested.

[-] twistypencil@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago
[-] Confused_Emus@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 2 months ago

Sounds more like an issue with the assholes you were surrounded with than with you. Good on you for sticking with the obvious smart choice.

[-] affiliate@lemmy.world 17 points 2 months ago

getting a rabies shot in the US is a pain in the ass, but it’s definitely still worth doing. (speaking from experience)

when i got the first shot, they gave me like 3-4 other shots too, but it was for a cat bite so mileage may vary on that part. i went to the ER for the first shot because you need to get it within 24 hours. at the ER, i found out that the ER was the only place i could get it (at least where i was, not sure if that is true nationwide). and i had to go back to the ER 3 times for follow up shots, each on a specific day. and each time i had to wait 3-4 hours for a 5 minute shot.

absolutely still worth doing though. the rabies numbers are crazy. 100% chance to die if you have rabies and no vaccine. 0% chance to die with the vaccine.

i also found out that there are pre-exposure and post-exposure rabies vaccines, and the pre-exposure ones only require 3 shots and can be gotten at a pharmacy, but the post-exposure ones require an ER visit. (again, this might vary from state to state)

[-] Pilferjinx@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

Do anti-vaxxers refuse to take rabies vaccine?

[-] Confused_Emus@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 2 months ago

Darwinism in action as long as it happens before they have kids.

[-] njm1314@lemmy.world 19 points 2 months ago

It's a weird use of passive voice

[-] calabast@lemm.ee 19 points 2 months ago

After being found in room, bat linked to rabies related to fatal incident undergone by baby, according to sound waves created by the mouth of official who represents Canada.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

Rabies virus transferred from bat to infant, resulting in a fatality.

I'm not sure if it applies to journalism, but when I do things like write reports about medicals I was involved in, I write like that. Usually because that person goes on to definitive care and I don't know how they fared. Patient was found in this location, services were called, patient was transported to hospital. It feels robotic, but idk how best to handle it.

[-] stoly@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

This is journalistic style. The goal isn’t to say X was the cause of Y but that it’s reported that Y because of X.

[-] Smoogs@lemmy.world -3 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Define asap as a unit of time. As Being in a typical emergency waiting room for a life saving vaccine you could be waiting a full day.

Things that are faster than the emergency services:

Doing your taxes

Applying for residency

Applying for passport.

Applying for citizenship

Testing and buying a new car.

Getting a background check done

Waiting for the tv technician to arrive at your home when they give you an 8 hr waiting period and also the installation.

Being on hold with literally any service.

Getting any form of dental work done

Any sports game.

Painting a room

Doing a marathon

[-] BonesOfTheMoon@lemmy.world 10 points 2 months ago

I worked in an ER. If you were rabies exposed they moved a lot faster than that.

[-] Smoogs@lemmy.world -4 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

And yet people still die waiting in ER.

Working in ER doesn’t trump people who have been in ER waiting/dying to be seen. There have been deaths waiting in ER and it’s dismissed as not important enough to change the situation. If anything, claiming you worked in ER and defending this shit is admittance to apathy and sociopathic tendencies

[-] BonesOfTheMoon@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

I worked in an ER for three years and health care for twenty, and I have yet to see anyone die waiting.

[-] Smoogs@lemmy.world -2 points 2 months ago

That’s because of a bias liability clause. legally you’ve been coached that anyone dying in the waiting room isn’t to do with the waiting room and should be defended that their death is unrelated so that you can absolve yourself of any liability.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8743675/

identified the first 6-hour ED stay as a critical factor; after the first 6 hours of ED stay, the risks of mortality and admission to the intensive care unit increased by twofold progressively when patient permanence exceeded 24 hours. Chalfin et al. [9] reported a higher in-hospital mortality rate (17.4% vs. 12.9%) in a cohort of 120 hospitals for patients who were in the ED for more than 6 hours. Because of overcrowding, the risk of medical error becomes even more tangible, especially when we consider patients staying for long periods in overcrowded ED hallways/observation rooms [10]. The economic burden for patients is particularly high for those who are affected by diseases and needing critical care—such as patients with respiratory insufficiency who need noninvasive ventilation [11] or sepsis subjects—who usually stay in the ED for a long time before being assigned to the appropriate hospital ward [12,13].

Study 2021

[-] pishadoot@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 months ago

The study you link has literally nothing to do with your claim.

Do you find it weird that people die in ERs sometimes, and it happens more often in overcrowded ERs, as the study you link suggests? Because that's what it's saying. That long triage times and short staffing leads to worse patient outcomes... And surprise, this study was in 2021, still peak COVID year.

[-] Smoogs@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Covid is still here dumbass. And the several issues they named aren’t even Covid related

Holy shit All the fucking excuses you just come up with. You are so full of shit. You don’t even work in an ER. Fuck off psychopath. Stay away from people.

[-] pishadoot@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 months ago

Lol

Your reading comprehension is so, so bad

[-] SloppyPuppy@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Yes if you come in walking and talking into the er youll wait there for a while.

Trust me if you come there with half your face stuck youll get the shot before you can say fast.

[-] Smoogs@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago

If you’re walking and talking you’re using the last mobility to get help. You can walk and talk in early stages of many things that you need to get to an ER for EARLY treatment such as rabies, sepsis, respiratory, cardiovascular and the longer they are in waiting time the more complications there are.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8743675/

this post was submitted on 04 Oct 2024
206 points (99.0% liked)

News

23680 readers
4097 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS