213
submitted 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) by fpslem@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

Days before the 2016 election, Donald Trump’s former fixer Michael Cohen made a $130,000 payment to porn star Stormy Daniels in exchange for her silence about her alleged affair with the Republican presidential candidate. It did not quite go as planned. When Trump was in the White House, Daniels’s claims about their relationship (which Trump denies) went public. Years later, in May 2024, a Manhattan jury found Trump guilty on 34 felony counts of falsifying business records related to the payoff.

Trump has been trying to get his conviction thrown out or at least delay his sentencing (maybe forever). But we’ve already learned plenty of lurid details about the alleged relationship. So why would Trump make a second attempt to silence Daniels ahead of the 2024 election?

MSNBC’s Rachel Maddow reported on Wednesday that Trump’s attorney recently made another offer to Daniels. In 2018, years before the Manhattan DA brought charges against Trump, Daniels filed a defamation suit over a Trump tweet attacking her for claiming that she was threatened by a stranger to stay quiet about their affair. A federal judge dismissed the suit months later, and Daniels was ordered to pay Trump’s legal fees. As of this summer, the two camps were still haggling over the final amount: Team Trump had asked for $652,000 at one point, while Team Daniels said it should be closer to $600,000, per Maddow. Then in July, Trump’s lawyer sent a letter to Daniels’s representative saying that a payment of $620,000 was too low, but that they would agree to it if Daniels signed a nondisclosure agreement. According to MSNBC, the letter said this:

We disagree that a payment of $620,000.00 would be in full satisfaction of the three judgement. However, we can agree to settle these matters for $620,000.00, provided that your client agrees in writing to make no public or private statements related to any alleged past interactions with president Trump, or defamatory or disparaging statements about him, his businesses and/or any affiliates or his suitability as a candidate for President.

Daniels’s lawyer rejected the offer. Eventually, Trump’s attorney said that after speaking to “my client and co-counsel,” they would agree to $635,000 — with no mention of Daniels remaining silent. Daniels’s attorney said they eventually settled on $627,500 with no NDA.

...

all 16 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] cybervseas@lemmy.world 44 points 2 months ago

600k in legal fees, good lord.

[-] Valmond@lemmy.world 12 points 2 months ago

That's how you don't pay people successfully. Who would dare make an attack that could cost 600.000 ...

[-] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 21 points 2 months ago

Speaking as a former 3rd Grader, I owe a debt of gratitude for all those students who will follow after me.

Because of Donald Trump, the dirty minded tykes of the future will be able to do reports on the career of Stormy Daniels.

[for the "...bOth SideS aRe tHe SAme" crowd it was prosecutor Ken Starr who brought up Monica Lewinski in a matter completely separate from Whitewater.]

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago

Maybe, although I don't know that too many school kids do reports about Clinton and Lewinsky.

[-] tacosanonymous@lemm.ee 5 points 2 months ago

I did. It didn’t go over well, though.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

How many times did you write "blowjob?"

[-] tacosanonymous@lemm.ee 5 points 2 months ago

Zero. I used terminology such as "oral sex" and "intercourse" etc.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

That's why it didn't go over well. You needed to make it erotic to get the teacher excited.

[-] MyOpinion@lemm.ee 9 points 2 months ago

Is Trump really living if he is not paying hush money?

[-] ObsidianZed@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

Maybe it was a rebill kind of thing he setup. Hush money on subscription.

[-] rusticus@lemm.ee 7 points 2 months ago

Fuck you OP. Horrific untrue title.

[-] fpslem@lemmy.world 7 points 2 months ago

Back atcha, buddy, you know this sub removes posts that don't use the article title? Take it up with the title editor, not me.

[-] over_clox@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

What's the point now? She done spoke out, not like she can magically retract her words and everyone just forget about it..

this post was submitted on 17 Oct 2024
213 points (89.0% liked)

News

23659 readers
3180 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS