480
And now Republicans will put forth another bill that's even worse and the courts will wait until after the 2024 election to reverse it.
No. The Texas legislature meets in January of odd numbered years. They can call special sessions but they can't make a worse law as it'll be equally unenforceable and if they did there'd be lawsuits to get injunctions to stop the count until it's resolved.
There's likely to be appeals of this ruling though.
Anyways try to be more positive. This is a win.
It is a penalty kick at best, not a win.
Requiring Texas to get this shit pre-approved was the win, then SCOTUS said they weren't currently discriminating and removed that. Texas immediately started right back up of course, since the preclearance was the only thing stopping them.
Requiring everything to be relitigated over and over when there is a clear history of discrimination just enables the discrimination.
No. The Texas legislature meets in January of odd numbered years. They can call special sessions but they can’t make a worse law as it’ll be equally unenforceable
"Equally unenforceable" in this case means "enforceable until the courts get ahold of it after the election."
See the rest of the sentence.
I saw the rest of the sentence.
and if they did there’d be lawsuits to get injunctions to stop the count until it’s resolved.
I also know what happened last time, and it wasn't that.
We should use that terminology more often I think.
X state broke civil rights. Kinda has a nice ring to it. Who would’ve guessed it’d be southern state
Go a step further: [State] violated its citizens' rights.
In unrelated news, Texas tells court that they will continue to not care.
What happens when Texas throws out the ballots anyway? You gonna force them to redo an entire election and take out the illegitimate politicians? Or is some director of some government office gonna get sued for a big fine and thats it? It remains to be seen if modern day US politics is even calable of removing someone once they're elected, so how do you even enforce this?
Probably ideally if they refuse is the national guard goes in and ensures a free and fair election, and people preventing it get arrested. Will that actually happen though? Idk.
Don't worry, it'll get enforced for the next Election anyway and then the Courts shall look the other way. That was the whole reason for preclearance.
this post was submitted on 22 Aug 2023
480 points (98.8% liked)
politics
19107 readers
4007 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS