36
submitted 1 week ago by Chewie@slrpnk.net to c/energy@slrpnk.net

WTF?

This is why cloudy systems are asking for trouble. I have several charge controllers at home - none of them connect to the internet, and although probably more expensive, I feel vindicated that this was the right choice....

top 10 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] tiramichu@lemm.ee 21 points 1 week ago

If your device can be disabled remotely, it isn't your device.

[-] m_f@midwest.social 11 points 1 week ago

I'm really looking forward to solar, but I will never touch anything I don't own myself, for this exact reason. They took the shitty business model of game "licensing" and applied it to physical goods. The other issue is that sometimes your power can go out and you've got solar panels, but they're owned by the utility company, run straight to the grid, and you're not allowed to use them, making them useless for you.

[-] paperBark@slrpnk.net 7 points 1 week ago

Damn I was planning on a sol-ark package in the spring...

Any recommendations for a non-connected (budget-friendly if possible) brand to look for?

[-] sonori@beehaw.org 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I just installed a sol ark system, and can confirm that they work just as well with a pi and Solar Assistant. Not open source, but integrates well with homeassistant and no need for network connecting the actual electrical equipment, just usb.

[-] Chewie@slrpnk.net 3 points 1 week ago

I like the MorningStar brand, but they aren't cheap. I wrote a review here if you're interested: http://www.gogreenit.net/index.php?page=morningstar-tristar-60a-mppt

[-] perestroika@slrpnk.net 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

My preference has become Maximum Solar. They work with button and LCD control. It ain't convenient but I reprogram them only twice a year - when transitioning between summer (hot, energy surplus, preserve batteries by not charging them fully) and winter configurations (cold, energy deficit, fill batteries to the maximum). I've thought about automating that, but didn't bother.

[-] Chewie@slrpnk.net 3 points 1 week ago

Got a link? that name isn't very unique :(

[-] perestroika@slrpnk.net 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Oh, indeed, that's a common problem with them. :) You can find them here:

https://maximumsolar.online/

[-] Securus777@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

I have a sol-ark and like it though this is concerning. In this case it's dyne on dyne branded and sol-ark has nothing to do with it, as far as we are aware.

If you don't care about the pretty graphs and data points and just want it to do it's job, then getting whatever inverter you want and not connecting to the net solves this problem. Alternatively, locking down traffic to and from this device is something I'll be looking at.

[-] perestroika@slrpnk.net 6 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I never let my energy devices onto the Internet. The house controller - a Raspberry Pi - is allowed when I wire it to the router using an ethernet cable.

If I worked at the company which did the cyberattack, I would fear both civil liability and prosecution.

this post was submitted on 21 Nov 2024
36 points (97.4% liked)

Green Energy

2244 readers
206 users here now

Everything about energy production and storage.

Related communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS