Adding that to the list of reasons I dislike crypto and its fanboys (as if I needed another).
The fuck is there to loosen? lmao
Like others are saying, crypto laws are a bit murky
In general though, it's pretty well in agreement that you're supposed to pay capital gains tax when you sell, I imagine that's something they may try to do away with.
I bought a tiny amount of Bitcoin probably a decade ago, and have basically been sitting on it ever since. It's of course grown in value significantly since then (though we're still only talking enough for maybe a couple nice dinners or a modest vacation, not life-changing wealth)
Capital gains tax takes a pretty good chunk out of what I'd earn from it, don't get me wrong, I'd still make money off of it no matter where I tried to cash out, but currently it's hovering right around the point where I'm not sure if it's worth the hassle of having one more thing to keep track of and figure out on my taxes for a relatively small payoff.
If they did away with the capital gains tax on crypto, I'd probably cash out right now (and never look back, I don't feel I need to repeat this experiment)
I'm not saying that they should do away with capital gains on crypto, just kind of pointing out one way they could get it and how it might affect me personally.
Payday crypto loans.
Lots of companies (edit or parts of their products) have pulled out of the USA due to the lack of clarity in crypto rules. Many have been served with wells notices with the SEC claiming their breaking laws around securities, forcing settlements or making companies fight to stand up for not being a security. The ETFs took years to get approved, and it really only happened because a judge told the SEC to fuck off this year.
The US has been crippling the US crypto industry for years. Whatever you see is happening in spite of that.
Fuck Trump, but crypto regs are fucked in the US. Also fuck any crypto person who voted for Trump because of this. Even if he does what he says here, it's not worth it
Just yesterday an appeals judge finally ruled that a smart contract without admin keys (immutable code) is not property, while people are in jail or being jailed over writing them and being considered the owners.
Edit: and even with the ETFs approved, the SEC still isn't allowing the providers to offer them how they want. E.g they can't stake part of the ethereum they hold to provide yield/interest even though it's baked into how these blockchains work with proof of stake.
The important part of this is Trump launching his new crypto "lending" platform they can't explain. It's surely to be a vessel for bribes to flow into and out of the new administration, and for all his "friends" to try and do all their shady business dealings. Allowing him to keep his new platform/fake-crypto-bank (or even his kids to proxy) while also being able to have it regulated (well apparently deregulated - although it's already the wild west) seems like a HUGE conflict of interest/liability.
Waiting for the bullshit doge fork that Elon will pump. I'm betting it's called Freedom Coin.
His new "lending" crypto scam is close, World Liberty Financial. He just got 30 million from a China-born "entrepreneur" that I'm sure will not be a conflict of interest. This scam apparently uses WFL tokens they are letting people pre-purchase before they even explain how the scam works lol.
He is stupid he will call it Xcoin or something.
Oh, sigh, there's so much to dislike about this criminal enterprise that calls itself #47.
And a boon for pump and dumps. Good for big players. Imagine that.
What regulations???
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.
Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.
7. No duplicate posts.
If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners.
The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.