248

Australia moves to ban billionaires from buying elections (www.thelondoneconomic.com)

submitted 2 weeks ago by Rapidcreek@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world

19 comments fedilink hide all child comments

all 20 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[-] SomeWeeb@lemmy.world 40 points 2 weeks ago

It isn't as positive as it sounds. Donation reform is something the major parties have twisted into a method of consolidating their own power. The two major parties have both been losing support to third-party candidates, and these reforms are now being used as a means to stop that.

The linked article is very brief and doesn't go into any real detail. Here's a more in-depth (albeit somewhat opinionated) bit of coverage: https://www.crikey.com.au/2024/11/26/donations-reforms-hoax-major-parties/

[-] redwattlebird@lemmings.world 11 points 2 weeks ago

I suspect it's largely targeting the teals because the Greens aren't negatively effected by it. The Libs are losing heaps of ground to them.

[-] pntha@lemmy.world 9 points 2 weeks ago

almost entirely directed at the Teals. shame, as well; Dr. Monique Ryan is one of the most level headed, intelligent parliamentarians we’ve had in a long time.

[-] redwattlebird@lemmings.world 6 points 2 weeks ago

Absolutely agree. A lot of the teals are providing a great alternative to the Libs who were pretty much on a gravy train for a long time. It disgusts me that the main parties would prefer to create legislation to inhibit change rather than adapt to what the people obviously want.

[-] solomon42069@lemmy.world 8 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Neither major party has anything to offer the average person this election. Albo sat on his hands until discontent towards Morrison tilted things his way. Dutto is doing the same thing.

As many observers have said, I believe this is just a form of attrition to starve minor parties of funding, diminish their ability to organise and prevent challenges to their duopoly. Both parties receive money from the same people - mining, sports betting, other pieces of shit in our community.

[-] neon_nova@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 2 weeks ago

Yo, is that guys eyebrow falling off?

[-] ininewcrow@lemmy.ca 13 points 2 weeks ago

The picture was corrected for us living in the northern hemisphere ... he is actually upside down (like everyone in Australia) which is why his eyebrows are having difficulty fighting gravity.

[-] dyathinkhesaurus@lemmy.world 11 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Gina Rhinehart has entered the chat...

[-] Dave@lemmy.nz 10 points 2 weeks ago

Does Australia allow super PAC type organisations?

Its all good to cap donations but if you can donate to an entity that's not the party who will run ads and campaign for the party, then it doesn't really matter that you capped party donations.

[-] HamsterRage@lemmy.ca 5 points 2 weeks ago

The PACs aren't the issue, it's that they are allowed unlimited spending. In Canada, where I live, third party spending is capped at $350K per registered partisan group.

[-] Dave@lemmy.nz 2 points 2 weeks ago

Yeah good thought. Could you make a parent group that donates their donations to 100 other groups to get around it, or does Canada have something that protects against that sort of manipulation?

[-] HamsterRage@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 weeks ago

Nope. Collusion is not allowed.

[-] BoobaAwooga@lemmynsfw.com 8 points 2 weeks ago

How’s the Australian immigration process

[-] ramsorge@discuss.online 5 points 2 weeks ago

Easy if you are worth anything. Are you? (Not a jab, serious question)

[-] FoxyFerengi@lemm.ee 6 points 2 weeks ago

Financial or education? I'm mostly dreaming, I have a deathly fear of ~~drop bears~~ giant spiders that has absolutely nothing to do with little cousins throwing dinner plate sized arachnids at me for the lols

[-] flueterflam@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago

I grew up elsewhere but lived in Canberra (the capital in ACT) for about 4 years. I heard about all the scary, deadly things and was a bit worried also. Long-story, short - it's very unlikely to be an issue unless you live in certain areas.

The big funnel-web spiders are mainly an issue in an area north and a bit south of Sydney and reasonably close to the coast. I never saw one of them while living there (except in photos). My understanding also is that the spiders tend to live outside of the urban areas and more in the suburban/rural areas.

You're more likely to get into a car accident with a kangaroo than have an issue with those big-ass spiders, from what I was told. They're somewhat like deer in the US. But less of a joke because they are known to slash people with velociraptor-like foot naila/claws after being hit by cars and assumed to be dead by drivers who get out and check. Death by disoriented/injured kangaroo is scarier than death by spider in Australia for most, and I say this seriously!

The scariest spider stories I had... 1. out of town for several months and my bicycle had a black widow-looking (the redback, I believe) spider under the seat. and 2. one day, there was some sort of spiders born and sailing on the wind event where little spiders where everywhere (but they weren't the Sydney funnel-web or redback spiders, luckily).

[-] ramsorge@discuss.online 3 points 2 weeks ago

Everything scary down there is bigger than your hand. Hand sized spiders? My heart is racing at the idea.

And, both? Are you in a job that is desired? Medical, technology? Something highly skilled. And, are you at least $100k in the black? In cash?

[-] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

I love Australia, if it didn't have 4 of the 5 most deadly snakes in the world.

[-] Deceptichum@quokk.au 2 points 2 weeks ago

Have $1.5m and hold the investment in the country for 4 years.

this post was submitted on 12 Dec 2024

248 points (98.8% liked)

politics

19244 readers

2033 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News