this post was submitted on 18 Jan 2025
-7 points (26.7% liked)

Carnivore

103 readers
1 users here now

Redirect. This community has been closed in favor of !carnivore@lemm.ee

Attacks against other users or groups will not be tolerated.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Serinus@lemmy.world
jet@hackertalks.com
-7
Vegan said WHAT?! - part 4 (lemmy.world)
submitted 2 weeks ago by FelixCress@lemmy.world to c/carnivore@lemmy.world
1 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Eating animals is comparable to nazi holocaust and if you feel offended by this comparison, that's because you are prejudiced against animals (and "animal liberation", whatever it is).

Certainly, it would be viciously circular to assume that animal liberation is mistaken from the start, which makes a comparison offensive, and which in turn is supposed to prove that animal liberation is wrong. I conclude that if all other objections against animal liberation fail, objecting to the Holocaust comparison by itself will not indicate the case for anti-animal liberation. I submit the possibility that some people are deeply offended by the comparison because they are profoundly prejudiced against animals

https://lemmy.world/post/144597

top 1 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] psud@lemm.ee 2 points 2 weeks ago

What's really fun is when they talk themselves into a corner

  1. Confining or hurting an animal is bad
  2. Letting someone hurt an animal is bad
  3. Animals are someone
  4. Predators exist
  5. Can't have that, kill all the animals to prevent animal suffering