this post was submitted on 02 Feb 2025
249 points (94.3% liked)

Animemes

1798 readers
221 users here now

Memes related to anime. Animemes.

Rules
  1. Don't be a shithead.
  2. Posts must be a meme with anime or related to anime or weeb culture.
  3. Use NSFW tag for lewd/ecchi. No explicit hentai.
  4. Nothing illegal, copyrighted, etc
  5. Repost only if the last post is 6 months old.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 30 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] abfarid@startrek.website 45 points 4 days ago (3 children)

No way media compressed 5x.

[–] Anafabula@discuss.tchncs.de 15 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Maybe they store images as uncompressed .bmp for some reason

[–] Lichtblitz@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 4 days ago (2 children)

bmp should not compress more than other media files. jpeg, png, etc. can compress so much because they are lossy

[–] Kwdg@discuss.tchncs.de 11 points 4 days ago (1 children)
[–] Lichtblitz@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 4 days ago

You're right. png can be lossy but that's uncommon in the wild.

[–] Anafabula@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

Three files of the same image: A png (15.7MiB), a bmp (28.8MiB) and a bmp.zip (16.4MiB)

PNG actually uses the same compression algorithm as ZIP (DEFLATE).
Here are the files.

[–] Lichtblitz@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

The image doesn't look like a photo. The meme is about porn. Digital images can contain large areas of repeating patterns (uniform color areas for example) that can be compressed losslessly pretty well. Even slight noise from an image sensor can block that kind of compression.

[–] Anafabula@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

With a picture from Unsplash:
Three files of the same image: A png (34.5MiB), a png.zip (34.5MiB), a jpg (4.9MiB), a bmp (98.2MiB) and a bmp.zip (65.1MiB)

ZIP compression of bmp is worse, but still compresses more than png. Here are the files.

[–] Lichtblitz@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Fascinating. That's much more than I expected. Thanks for taking the time.

[–] reev@sh.itjust.works 2 points 4 days ago

Was thinking the same thing

[–] hmmm@sh.itjust.works 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Why are you surpried? It's actually possible. You just need so much computing power like around 64 GB ram and High End CPU to Pack and Unpack both.

[–] abfarid@startrek.website 7 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Because modern media files are already compressed by default and have very little redundancy in them.

[–] bruhduh@lemmy.world 14 points 4 days ago (2 children)
[–] hmmm@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 days ago

Seriously I don't know maybe you reverse search this.

[–] MrLLM@ani.social 1 points 4 days ago

OP’s computer

[–] TheTechnician27@lemmy.world 20 points 4 days ago (2 children)
[–] Pregnenolone@lemmy.world 31 points 4 days ago (1 children)

WinRAR got me through some hard times. She might be filthy, but she did the job

[–] TheTechnician27@lemmy.world 12 points 4 days ago (2 children)

She's proprietary nagware, and 7-Zip is better in every way.

[–] bruhduh@lemmy.world 13 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Say truthfully, when you was 7 y.o kid, did you used fully open sourced OS then? I think everyone used winrar when they were kids/teenagers (before learning about foss)

[–] ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I used winrar until I found out about 7 zip around 2003-4ish, but I still used 7z on windows back then tbf. Just using 7z and VLC on windows simply because they're better doesn't mean you have to be Stallman.

[–] bruhduh@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)
[–] ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

...shit honestly I used winsomething until 7z, but you got me I can't remember if it was -zip or -rar, damn similar names +20yr!

But in either case, "the rest."

[–] bruhduh@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

You don't remember this brotha?

[–] ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Guess I used winrar back then, 'cause no.

Hol' up is that a music player? Definitely no. For video it was VLC pretty early, WMP before that because it was preinstalled but the second it didn't play something and the advice searching gave was "vlc will play the file" I never went back. I don't remember what I used as a media player tbh, foobar for a while for sure but it was definitely something before that. Hmm, what the hell did I use?

..i think I may have just used the preinstalled WMP until VLC/foobar, huh. I did have a zune when those came around too and used that software, but mostly to interface with the device not play my library, then I did the registry edit so you didn't need that anymore, and I think I used foobar before that, definitely used vlc before.

[–] admin@sh.itjust.works 2 points 4 days ago

I didn't discover 7-zip until 5th grade, so WinRAR always takes a spot in my heart <3.

[–] GrammarPolice@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago

I use Windows in-built extract

[–] superkret@feddit.org 10 points 4 days ago

Is this lossless?

you can't compress most media files again, they don't get smaller that way as they're already compressed. you can't compress files again, that's against Shannon Information theory.

[–] alsaaas@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 4 days ago

What if it's on a BTRFS --compress-force=zstd:22 compressed subvolume?

[–] lars 0 points 4 days ago

Do Windows people often see .xzs? Does anyone?