this post was submitted on 12 Feb 2025
35 points (100.0% liked)

LGBTQ+

6289 readers
20 users here now

All forms of queer news and culture. Nonsectarian and non-exclusionary.

See also this community's sister subs Feminism, Neurodivergence, Disability, and POC


Beehaw currently maintains an LGBTQ+ resource wiki, which is up to date as of July 10, 2023.


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I am neuro-divergent. I struggle with remembering minutia that aren't, coincidentally, just luckily the minutia that I glimpse, once, and never forget. I state this not as an excuse but as a statement of fact and I am terrible at remembering people's pronouns. I cannot even remember people's names. When I see people I know, I can remember who they are, what we have done together, where we have been, what we have seen and even the tone of voice they might use to exclaim at an occurrence or upon some eventuality but – yet – I often cannot remember their names. Pronouns are like parts of their names.

And, so, I tend to address everyone with "they" / "them".

In my limited experience, this only tends to annoy the anti-woke conservative types who renounce the very concept of pronouns and believe that one should only ever be addressed as "he" / "him" – assuming that a penis hangs between their thighs – or "she" / "her" otherwise. (A musing: How do they know? Also, what if it's cold? Or they're upside down? Quandaries within quandaries!)

BUT... I am open minded and I can believe that others, too, might be offended by my cop-out, including open-minded, non-mysoginist, non-bigots who do understand why people elect to be addressed under non-Victorian pronouns.

I have recently had reason to pause and wonder about this. I struggle with pronouns but I do try my best and so, I'm asking: for which reasons might someone object? Tell me, LGBTQ+ community.

top 25 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] inv3r5ion@lemmy.dbzer0.com 16 points 6 days ago

They/them is a default for someone you don’t know until otherwise corrected.

And if some chud gets all hissy about their pronouns point out the irony of it.

[–] tiefling@lemmy.blahaj.zone 11 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

I'll throw in one perspective, one of my pet peeves as a trans woman is when people use they/them to refer to me after I've told them my pronouns. A lot of people will do it to try to be inclusive, and I appreciate the sentiment, but my pronouns are not and never have been they/them. I've been fighting for over a decade to get people to use she/her.

Of course, this only applies when it's targeted and not to the more general use of singular they/them. And in the grand scheme of things, it's nothing more than a pet peeve

[–] schleudersturz@beehaw.org 5 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I'm sure that dead-naming is far worse but would I be wrong to think that this lies in the same vein as dead-naming?

This is fascinating to me. I've never changed my name so I cannot have been dead-named but I do know how I feel when my family treats me in a way that denies the facets of my identity that I have accepted in my more recent adulthood – concretely: my neuro-diversity, because they don't know that I don't think of myself as binary.

Of course, these are not the same thing but people understand differences by bridging gaps based on common ground and all of this discussion builds common ground, in my mind. That's why I'm asking.

[–] Pa_Kalsha@beehaw.org 1 points 4 days ago

Not the origonal commenter, but "analogous to deadnaming" is certainly how it can feel sometimes.

Obviously there's innocent mistakes/forgetfulness, but when someone had no problem calling a (passing) trans person by the correct binary pronoun but suddenly "can't remember" or reverts to "they/them" once they learn you're trans - there's clearly something else going on there. It's additionally upsetting because the slight is subtle enough, and the excuse believable enough, that you can't easily explain why it's a problem to people who don't already understand it.

[–] melp@beehaw.org 17 points 6 days ago

When in doubt, I always default to they/them. I also like to be called they/them.

[–] irotsoma@lemmy.blahaj.zone 13 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I also default to they/them. That has been the default for way longer than this "debate" (i.e. stream of hate) has been popular. I'd love to see the people who use "he or she" instead of "they" in normal speech about people whose gender they don't know. I don't know anyone outside of old formal papers from the pre-internet era that use that kind of language.

I'm agender by the way, so not only are pronouns sometimes hard to remember because they don't connect to the way I perceive a person, but i don't even perceive my own gender except when forced to, so take my comments with that in mind.

[–] schleudersturz@beehaw.org 3 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Your comments might be more relevant to me than you know. I don't know if I'm "agender" or something else. I know I very definitely do perceive that I have a gender, sometimes. Maybe an hour here and there, an evening, … but I can definitely identify with that "don't even perceive my own gender" bit for the vast majority of my life, integrating over time.

And, as you can clearly tell, I haven't perceived my own gender intensely enough to bother to find the right label for it so I mostly just let the world slap whatever labels they think makes them happy.

I guess that that annoys me, though, now that I come to think about it. I do know that I'm not what they label me. Most think I'm heterosexual male because that's how I suppose I present in real life – how I dress and what you'd see on the "FKK" swimming lawn – and the rest label me "gay"-as-in-perjorative (I'm from a toxic-masculine culture, born in the 80's, with a voice pitched too high and a body that's not tall enough. What else would you expect?) I'm definitely neither of these. Or: nearly always neither of those and never only either of those.

Maybe this unacknowledged irritation is why I'm here, looking to find the right way to treat others even while I've long given up on being treated right by the wrong sort of others? (I am exceedingly lucky in that I can fly below the radar and live in a safe country so I literally can treat people who deny my existence as simply beneath my notice.)

[–] Zaleramancer@beehaw.org 3 points 4 days ago

I identify as agender now, I previously identified purely as a gay man for most of my life. In retrospect, it's kind of obvious for me, I've always been fascinated by characters who stood outside the gender binary- robots, aliens, etc. I was very Christian growing up and I was fascinated by angels as genderless beings.

In my case, I just don't like gendered language being applied to be in general. I don't identify as having a gender. It's always felt like work, being a man, like it's never enough and everyone has all these opinions about, "what a man is" and I resented it so Intensely.

Because I didn't want it. I wanted to be a weird outlier who didn't have to grapple with expectations in regards to my appearance, interests and talents based on something arbitrary that I didn't even opt into. I never felt validation from affirming my gender. It was just work I poured into a hole in the ground to please other people and make them more comfortable.

Now I'm pretty happy! I just don't give a shit about how I come off gender-wise and I basically don't care how people refer to me because I know I can act however I choose.

I'm not sure if this is helpful, but I felt like sharing? Maybe the irritation you're feeling is because there are parts of the gender role you're living out that you're dissatisfied with. Gender role is constructed, so I highly recommend picking the parts you want and living that, if that follows?

Anyway, thanks for sharing! I love when people talk about gender! It's nice to get to feel that way.

[–] irotsoma@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 4 days ago

Yeah, I think of two sides to labels. One is how you perceive yourself and one is how you communicate who you are to others.

For the internal labels, these are only useful to some people, and can change as often as you want, or you can chose to not use them at all and just be you. You decide. What they are useful for in my experience is self-discovery and helping you to decide how you want to present to others. So use them, or not, try them on for a while and see how it goes, switch them up. Treat them like trying on clothes at home. You can wear which ever ones you want, in whatever combination you want or just go naked. It's your house/brain.

External labels shouldn't be assigned and if they are you should ignore them. Don't let them affect who you are or how you behave or you just end up wearing masks. Now I say that with the caveat that masks are necessary in certain situations for safety or to preserve your job or whatever. But when you're free to be you in public, ignore those assigned by others. Again, using the clothing metaphor, it's like someone putting a hat on your head. It's rude for a stranger to come up to you and do that. Now it may be that hat looks great on you and turns out you wear it the rest of your life. But someone shouldn't put it on you, they should see that you might like it, hand it to you, and you decide to put it on or not. Same with labels. People can suggest a label, but should not try to assign one to you.

Problem with social labels is that it's not acceptable to go naked in many social situations. So you have to pick the ones you want or risk being forced to wear them. And in some situations, you will be forced to wear one without your consent. You just have to decide if it's worth being in that situation or if you should leave. And the other issue is that changing labels confuses people, just like significantly changing your clothing style might if you go from wife-beater and jeans to goth cat girl. So it's best to pick some base ones and then add on or make small adjustments as you go. There are lots of generalized labels like non-binary or gender-fluid that sound like might be a good starting point for you. Then you can add more specific ones later once you have internally tried them on for a bit or tried them on in safe spaces like with good friends who are open to it. Like starting out with a black tshirt and pants, then adding on a skirt or sweater later, you can add on something like demiboy which is a subset of non-binary and eventually get to more specific labels as you find them useful.

And also, something I always emphasize to people is that gender and sexuality are not directly related and sometimes even romantic interests and sexuality are not necessarily directly related. There may be a correlation for the majority, but it's not a direct relationship. So choose your sexuality, romantic, and gender labels separately at least the internal ones. Just realize that because language is weird, the most common romantic and sexuality labels are only meaningful when combined with a gender label (e.g. straight, gay, hetero/homosexual, etc), so it's good to find that first, but not necessary. There are more gender neutral sexuality labels, especially in the ace spectrum, or ones that explicitly specify the target gender rather than specifying the relationship the target gender has to your gender, like gynosexual.

And remember, we all change over time. Be flexible with yourself and don't worry about what you felt like in the distant past, only today. Gender, sexuality, etc., are much more complex psychologically than simply a single chromosome like many bigots pretend. It's mostly up to hormones and the way different parts of your body react to those hormones which can change over time from age, environment, diet, etc., not just your genes. Genes just set a starting point, and sometimes those get overridden before birth even. That's why people with an X chromosome can be born with a vagina and all the other combinations.

Hope that is useful. It's a deep interest of mine because my own journey has been complex. So I enjoy info-dumping about it. Lol

[–] termus@beehaw.org 13 points 6 days ago

Doing your best is the best you can do. As long as you're respectful and nice, no one is going to get mad over that if you fumble. It's how you act if corrected that really matters. If they do get mad, just apologize and move on.

This is a broad generalization but I feel like some of these people that get so angry over it, likely get angry over being corrected about anything.

[–] ognik@szmer.info 11 points 6 days ago (2 children)

If you use "they/them" to refer to a binary trans person, it'll make you sound bigoted, like you're de-gendering that person. For example, using "they/them" for a trans woman who goes by she/her pronouns will make her mad: she'll think you're not calling her a woman on purpose. Same with trans men.

[–] inv3r5ion@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (3 children)

This attitude drives me fucking nuts as a millennial who had to fight the real fights for LGBTQ acceptance only for the younger generation to get their panties in a twist for inadvertently being called by the “wrong” (gender neutral) pronoun.

Queers are on the verge of being hunted and exterminated in the US and y’all are pissy over being called a gender neutral pronoun by someone who doesn’t know you?

For fucks sake this is why the heteros hate us. Younger queers need faux outrage to feel important. Now the real threats are back on the horizon. Thanks to young out of touch activists caring more about pronouns than our physical safety and well-being.

[–] Evkob@lemmy.ca 13 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Blaming your fellow queers for your oppression, that's so incredibly lame.

I'm sure you are the perfect expression of queerness, and if every gay were like you, the bigots would stop hating us. /s

Like what are you even proposing? That in order to be an effective queer activist, you need to be okay with misgendering? I feel your rage, but please direct it towards the fascists taking away our rights instead of bashing other queers. This kind of community in-fighting in what the bigots want, we need queer solidarity right now.

[–] inv3r5ion@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 5 days ago

No, that automatically calling people the gender neutral they/them until otherwise specified isn’t misgendering, and furthermore, this kind of faux outrage bullshit set the LGBTQ rights movement back decades.

[–] ognik@szmer.info 6 points 5 days ago

The amount of assumptions you've made about me in this one comment is insane. I'm not from the US (and I've never had as many rights as you Americans, so don't police me on my lived experience with being oppressed as a queer person - you did not fight for any rights for me), and I'm not binary, so I have absolutely no problem with being called they/them. Queers in my country can't get married and the path to legal transition is long and dehumanizing (and for nonbinary people legally impossible) - I assure you I have enough of "real fights" to fight. That doesn't stop me from showing fellow trans people compassion and caring about their preferred pronouns.

I was telling OP why someone who's LGBT might feel offended for being called gender neutral pronouns. You know, answering the question they asked. You, on the other hand, are being fucking weird and combative completely unprovoked. Get lost

[–] Gaywallet@beehaw.org 4 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I do not think it's particularly nice to escalate and get mad at someone who is trying gently to educate you.

This comment was reported, please remember our only rule on this website and try to be nice in the future.

[–] inv3r5ion@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 5 days ago (1 children)

and likewise, as an older queer I’m doing my own educating here. I’m not going to sugarcoat the truth. Not now with the severity of the threat we collectively face while we’re having a fucking pissing match over pronouns and being offended by the innocent use of they/them purely to be outraged and feel important.

[–] Gaywallet@beehaw.org 3 points 5 days ago

To me it seems the original comment was simply someone providing an example of how binary trans folks can be upset at being referred to as they/them, an experience that many have also shared in here. Those who have chimed in have even stated it is mostly a pet peeve or an annoyance at best. I'm not sure I share your opinion that anyone was getting their "panties in a twist" so much as they were educating and sharing, which is completely reasonable on a website of this size in an area where folks who are not queer can read and comment.

Your response makes plenty of sense given the severity of problems happening right now. I wonder, however, if your energy is not better spent elsewhere? Infighting does not serve anyone, something which I see even you preaching, yet you are even replying to my comment where I simply am reminding you to be nice (which I made as an admin only because you were reported) with strong language deriding your fellow queers and allies.

[–] schleudersturz@beehaw.org 2 points 6 days ago (1 children)

That's fair. Insightful.

I have very nuanced bi-sexual tendencies and, to me, I don't personally have strong feelings towards my own pronouns but I have not personally realised any deep affiliation with "male" (my assigned gender) or "female" but I can well imagine that it is much more critical for a trans person who has realised an identity deeply enough to inspire them to transition.

I mean: I don't even care about my own gender – call me whatever. At certain times, I have an attraction one way or the other. I'm married to a woman. I'm a father. These facts are all true but I honestly couldn't care what pronouns or gender or sex you write down, for me. This is probably why I started this topic: I'm trying to understand how this is for others who care far more than I do.

I don't care but I do care to honour those who do care. I certainly care to honour those who care enough to choose to transition!

But oh dear, though. That does not help me. I'd love to call your hypothetical trans woman a woman on purpose but that would require me to notice what she thinks "normal" people "normally" notice and, yeah: autistic. Maybe I'll stop defaulting to "they" / "them" – at least online – and default to confused-blob-cat or something for pronouns.

[–] inv3r5ion@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 6 days ago (1 children)

No, call people you don’t know they/them until otherwise corrected and if they get pissy about it that’s their fault and not yours.

There’s real serious problems out there, being upset over being accidentally “misgendered” by having no gender recognition at all is fucking ridiculous attention seeking me me me behavior.

[–] schleudersturz@beehaw.org 3 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I cannot agree.

I have very week, most frequently non-existent gender allegiance but I do know that there's a tonne of stuff that's odd about me and I often am offended or driven off by people who do things that simply don't work with my mind-set so I can well understand why being "misgendered" (sarcasm quotes: yours.) might just be a thing that drives someone else away.

I'm not here because I'm accepting "fault" upon myself. I'm here because I want to be part of a tolerant future and I feel that this is important given the trajectory straight into hell that we are clearly currently set upon. I'm here because I'd at least like to ask "why" before I decide how I will behave in relation to others.

I choose to live as if the world was one in which I'd choose to live and, in that world, people get to choose their identities however they please. I can't relate to why someone takes offence at "they"/"them" but, if they are offended, I can and will accept that and, conversely, I would wish that they might realise that I will surely make mistakes and get this wrong even if I do or did understand.

This is the only fair deal: I try in good faith, they understand and offer the benefit of the doubt.

I don't perceive any attention-seeking but that's besides the point. Even if they choose to seek attention, I don't begrudge them that: sometimes, people seek attention. Why should I object?

[–] inv3r5ion@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 5 days ago

Getting mad about being “misgendered” by a stranger calling you the gender neutral they/them for the first time until otherwise specified isn’t behavior that’s acting in good faith but rather narcissistic attention seeking faux outrage.

[–] CyberEgg@discuss.tchncs.de 10 points 6 days ago

In the english language, they/them are pronouns used when you don't know a person's gender. So in that sense you're using them perfectly right.

However, relatively recently people started to adopt they/them as their own pronouns and some people might not identify with these pronouns and therefore might be displeased if they/them are used for them. But I struggle in a similar way as you (AuDHD here) and have not met a single person who was still angry after I explained my struggles (showing effort might be key for some though).

However, most people who rant about they/them (or pronouns in general, weirdly enough) are part of the anti-woke crowd (and grifters from those bubbles).

[–] veroxii@aussie.zone 8 points 6 days ago

I'm going to address the "remembering" part of your question a bit more since if that improves it improves the other parts.

I too struggle with names and memory in general at times. If you google a bit there are many techniques to help anchor names to people. What works for me is imagining them together with someone else with the same name, associating them with some other memory, etc.

So maybe see if that's something you can experiment with?

[–] ErsatzCoalButter@beehaw.org 8 points 6 days ago

This essay seems relevant to help more fully frame the question.

But in fact, gender is maintained by constant effort from everyone in society. Imagine what a truly genderless society would look like: no he/she pronouns. No seeing a stranger and thinking of them as male or female. No such thing as being gay or straight. People of all body types wearing pants or skirts as they please. The vision I’m describing isn’t a fantasy based on some fundamental change to how the world works. It would happen if tomorrow morning we all got out of bed and decided to stop paying any attention to gender.

[...]

[There are people who...] do care about gender. They have an internal sense that they need to look, dress, and act a certain way that conforms to their society’s idea of their gender. If they aren’t recognised as their gender, it makes them uncomfortable. These are the people who made our language have he and she pronouns. They’re the people who feel satisfied and fulfilled when they get addressed as “sir” or “madam”. They are where gender comes from.