Remember when he said to "use signal"? Pepperidge farm remembers.
this post was submitted on 17 Feb 2025
480 points (99.6% liked)
Privacy
35833 readers
686 users here now
A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.
Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.
In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.
Some Rules
- Posting a link to a website containing tracking isn't great, if contents of the website are behind a paywall maybe copy them into the post
- Don't promote proprietary software
- Try to keep things on topic
- If you have a question, please try searching for previous discussions, maybe it has already been answered
- Reposts are fine, but should have at least a couple of weeks in between so that the post can reach a new audience
- Be nice :)
Related communities
much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
He says he wants free speech, but all he ever wanted was to replace the previous censorship and propaganda regime with his own.
They always do
He never said he wants free speech for everyone :) TBH the shame should be on those who believed that Musk could somehow be the first right-wing extremist in history that wished the people at large had more rights and more freedoms.
He never said he wants free speech for everyone
Yes he fucking did. He called himself a “free speech absolutist” which was just a blatant lie just like every other sentence that has farted out of his Nazi lips.
"free speech absolutist"
I'm surprised DOGE themselves aren't using it to skirt FOIA.
Who says they aren't? Elon has zero problems with double standards.
oh they for sure are. also FOIA is probably dead forever. so. you know. be ready for that little announcement.
privacy for me, but not for thee!
Being a sovereign 101
They fall under the presidential records act so they aren't subject to FOIA until the 2030s.
They claim they fall under the Presidential Records Act, but they're lying.
why would someone still be using x at this time for starters is something that baffles me.
Circle jerking, I guess? Same reason I use lemmy :)
"Free speech extremist"
This just means you wrap your signal links in a URL shortener.
A slight hassle; but all the more reason to hate the muskratt.
We should be quietly linking anyone with a need to send a signal link to a nice privacy respecting URL shortening instance somewhere that will basically delete the link in 3-7 days unless told otherwise to keep it around by the user at creation.
Heck; host your own URL shortener while you're at it.
questions, not to you specifically, but to anyone who stumbles upon this thread.
- what would be a decent URL shortener that meets this criteria?
- any pointers to host one's own shortener? mainly i'm thinking of registrars, but also the mechanics to transform links and store data for a few days
There must be a hundred third-party freeware apps that let you encrypt files. Heck, even zip archivers have a password protect option. If you're a whistleblower, you're going to be collecting data over long periods of time, not sending instant messages. You can use OnionShare (droid-ify) to create temporary TOR links if you really need to share a file quickly and untraceably.
Isn't it strange that when you believe in an oligarch, they never disappoint.
Time to donate to signal again
Musk blocking Signal links makes me just a bit happier about my Signal donation every month :>
Monthly for me
I've gotta donate the signal and spread the word, it's been my messaging goat for years
least thick skinned wannabe "politician" I've ever seen.
"blocks links to Signal" What does that even means? It's not twitter; people are not sharing Signal links.
Most likely invite links to various groups / contacts
Well, them go Telegram? He would not want to block his right wing friends, too, would he?