154
submitted 11 months ago by Fubarberry@sopuli.xyz to c/steamdeck@sopuli.xyz

While it's great news that Bethesda is making an effort to make sure Starfield will run on Deck, I'd still like to recommend that most people wait for performance reports before buying and expecting a good experience.

all 31 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] StarkillerX42@lemmy.ml 60 points 11 months ago

Before buying a Bethesda game and expecting a good experience, expect a bad experience instead.

[-] superduperenigma@lemmy.world 17 points 11 months ago

Before buying a Bethesda game, wait a few months so the modders can fix it.

[-] Jagermo@feddit.de 9 points 11 months ago

I always go for the game of the year or anniversary editions. Like good wine, Bethesda games need some time.

[-] skullgiver@popplesburger.hilciferous.nl 1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

[This comment has been deleted by an automated system]

[-] doppelgangmember@lemmy.world 6 points 11 months ago

Man y'all are so negative

Just try and enjoy something or let it be

Not like they've made some of the greatest AAA in history or anything.

[-] limeaide@lemmy.ml 3 points 11 months ago

I agree to an extent. However, they've also been known for releasing buggy ass games before it was popular to do so lol. They've also been known for not fixing those problems and just moving on to the next product. Even if the next product is the same game just being resold

That is also a big part of their history

[-] ProfessorProteus@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago

I kind of agree with @doppelgangmember but yeah, Bethesda has taken a very apathetic approach to fixing bugs, or even preventing them in the first place. They used the godawful Gamebryo engine for way too long, and their Creation Engine is apparently based on it. Of course they're on CE2 now, but I have little to no faith that they've made any substantial improvements since people will buy their products no matter what.

To be fair, I really enjoy almost all of Bethesda's games, which is why I'm so disappointed that they just don't (seem to) care. I'm definitely waiting for a super duper sale before picking up the game.

[-] PHLAK@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago

You'll still probably be disappointed.

[-] RaincoatsGeorge@lemmy.zip 29 points 11 months ago

I just don’t think the steam deck is going to be able to handle this game. Baldurs Gate 3 is certified playable and they did a great job making it a seamless experience but it’s obvious that the system strains in anywhere but the most sparse locations.

The steam deck just isn’t meant to play all the AAA next gen ray traced games and nobody should expect it to do so. It already goes further than any handheld on the market, I don’t need it to play starfield. I need it to play cult of the lamb really well. And it does. And I love it.

[-] worfamerryman@beehaw.org 14 points 11 months ago

Someone said that valve does not want to upgrade the Steamdecks cpu regularly that way it can act as a baseline for games to target.

I kind of like this approach. I think so many devs focus on making everything bleeding edge when most of us would be happy playing with low settings.

Maybe the steamdeck will lead to further optimizations to these games down the line and maybe games that are early in development will try to target the steamdeck for the minimum spec.

Starfield and bg3 were too far along in development when steamdeck game out for them to optimize for it.

I’ll be happy to see how it runs though.

[-] Fidelity9373@artemis.camp 4 points 11 months ago

"Tricks" like FSR should certainly make a single platform be able to last longer. Say what you will about the techs usefulness on top of the line hardware, low/mid level hardware like the deck/ally/switch is where it's greatest benefits lie.

[-] worfamerryman@beehaw.org 2 points 11 months ago

My desktop gpu is an rx470 4gb.

It’s only slightly more powerful than the steamdeck. I’ve been waiting for the day when modern gaming can comfortably be done on an igpu.

I think we are basically there now.

[-] Car@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 11 months ago

FSR really shows it’s limitations when you’re running a low resolution to begin with. I want to like it, but it’s pretty noticeable and jarring with every game I’ve tried it with, including BG3.

[-] QubaXR@lemmy.world 11 points 11 months ago

Baldurs Gate 3 on Steam Deck is basically turning electricity into heat with some frames produced as a side effect :)

[-] CaptainEffort@sh.itjust.works 4 points 11 months ago

Unless it’s poorly optimized, Starfield should be nowhere near as demanding as Baldurs Gate. Do we know what the requirements are yet?

[-] dalingrin@lemm.ee 10 points 11 months ago

Hard disagree with this. Both of these games are large zone, systems driven games which makes them more demanding on the CPU than many games out there. Starfield will probably a little more GPU demanding than Baldur's Gate 3 due to dynamic lighting systems and draw distance.

[-] CaptainEffort@sh.itjust.works 4 points 11 months ago

We’ll see, but ignoring Todd’s usual buzz words Starfield just looks like Fallout 4 with better faces and lighting.

Though truthfully Bethesda isn’t exactly known for their optimization either way, so who knows.

[-] iAmTheTot@kbin.social 2 points 11 months ago

Baldurs Gate 3 is certified playable and they did a great job making it a seamless experience but it’s obvious that the system strains in anywhere but the most sparse locations.

Yeaaaah it's pretty rough on the steam deck in my experience.

[-] GBU_28@lemm.ee 3 points 11 months ago

Huh I just tuned down the graphics and it is playing just fine.

Only caveat being I always play it plugged in to power

[-] Nima@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago

I have 140 hours on steam deck for BG3. I'm having a blast.

[-] iAmTheTot@kbin.social 1 points 11 months ago

I have every setting on low and it still makes the fans go brrrrr, pushing 90° temps.

[-] Nima@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

works fine on mine. I just play plugged in

[-] skymtf@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 11 months ago

I wonder how it will run, cause like Cyberpunk works on the steamdeck but the res makes it look like a different game.

[-] Callie@pawb.social 6 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Is it going to run at 30fps though? The minimum requirements for the game are pretty high, requiring 8GB of VRAM. The game just seems like it wouldn’t run at a stable frame rate at all for a lot of steam users.

going by the steam hardware survey, listing the 1650 as the most popular graphics card to use, it just doesn’t seem like many people can run it

[-] Overzeetop@sopuli.xyz 5 points 11 months ago

For your information, low FPS makes it look "cinematic." It's targeted at 24FPS to give you a theater-like experience. 😂

[-] Callie@pawb.social 1 points 11 months ago
[-] topinambour_rex@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago

It's good to be the most popular once in a while.

[-] Xianshi@lemm.ee 1 points 11 months ago

I'll pick it up in a few years in a sale when all of the bugs are ironed out and the proved has dropped

this post was submitted on 30 Aug 2023
154 points (95.3% liked)

Steam Deck

14212 readers
174 users here now

A place to discuss and support all things Steam Deck.

Replacement for r/steamdeck_linux.

As Lemmy doesn't have flairs yet, you can use these prefixes to indicate what type of post you have made, eg:
[Flair] My post title

The following is a list of suggested flairs:
[Discussion] - General discussion.
[Help] - A request for help or support.
[News] - News about the deck.
[PSA] - Sharing important information.
[Game] - News / info about a game on the deck.
[Update] - An update to a previous post.
[Meta] - Discussion about this community.

Some more Steam Deck specific flairs:
[Boot Screen] - Custom boot screens/videos.
[Selling] - If you are selling your deck.

These are not enforced, but they are encouraged.

Rules:

Link to our Matrix Space

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS