this post was submitted on 14 Mar 2025
170 points (96.7% liked)

politics

21846 readers
3198 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] lupusblackfur@lemmy.world 69 points 1 day ago (30 children)

As posted in a different thread:

I don’t care if it’s cloture or the actual bill itself…

There should be zero Dems voting “yes” on any-fucking-thing these MAGAt bastards want.

Blatant and complete obstruction is the only way to play this hand for the foreseeable future.

Those Dems that do vote yes… 🖕 🖕 🖕 🖕 🖕

[–] Ledericas@lemm.ee 4 points 9 hours ago

Fetterman was a given, since he's been cozying up with the GOP as of late

load more comments (29 replies)
[–] HelixDab2@lemm.ee 30 points 1 day ago (5 children)

Anything I would have to say would get me permanently banned from the site for advocating violence.

Remember, as Napoleon Bonaparte said to Wellesley, Duke of Wellington, "Violence never solved anything."

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Maeve@kbin.earth 29 points 1 day ago

controlled opposition within controlled opposition. Aka rotating villains.

[–] GuyFawkes@midwest.social 22 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Traitors. Remember their names and primary them as soon as possible!

[–] alkbch@lemmy.ml 15 points 1 day ago (1 children)

There have been some discussions this week about AOC running for Senate to take Schumer’s seat, however 2028 is a long time away.

[–] dohpaz42@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago (7 children)

We won’t make it to then.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago

The shutdown will still happen...

This does away with the habitual earmarking of funds, and instead just puts things in a handful of piles.

So they can just not fund parts of the government that they don't like, and give everything to shit like ICE. CBP, or fucking Teslas.

They didn't avert a shutdown so much as freely give away what power they had.

[–] lolola@lemmy.blahaj.zone 13 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Democratic Sens. Richard Durbin (Ill.), Catherine Cortez Masto (Nev.), John Fetterman (D-Pa.), Kirsten Gillibrand (N.Y.), Maggie Hassan (N.H.), Gary Peters (Mich.), Jeanne Shaheen (N.H.) and Brian Schatz (Hawaii) (Nev.) all voted "yes" in addition to Schumer, — as did Maine's Angus King, an Independent who caucuses with Democrats.

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Man I’m sure glad I called Fetterman.

That wasn’t a waste of my goddamn time nosirree

[–] Ledericas@lemm.ee 1 points 9 hours ago

He was a given, the most likely one to vote for it.

[–] MelodiousFunk@slrpnk.net 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Unfortunately the only thing getting through to Fetterman at this point is more brain damage. What a waste of potential.

[–] Ledericas@lemm.ee 2 points 9 hours ago

The stroke prevents any braincells from working

[–] Stern@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

Schumer did manage to get GOP leadership to agree to hold a vote to ensure that the D.C.'s budget did not suffer a $1 billion cut. The House's bill was written to include the budget reduction, sparking concern.

[–] libertyforever@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] BrokenGlepnir@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Did they even ask for anything? Not that they would have gotten it, I just bet they didn't even ask for anything

[–] alkbch@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 day ago

No, they didn’t.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

“Who else are you gonna vote for” - ten democrats, probably

[–] alkbch@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Some of them are not up for reelection for many years. They might be banking on most people forgetting about this, and they may be right.

[–] Ledericas@lemm.ee 1 points 9 hours ago

Arnt some also retiring? So they may not give a fuck either way

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (5 children)

They are right. Americans are idiots and we deserve every bit of suffering we’ll get.

Fuck this country.

[–] Ledericas@lemm.ee 1 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

too bad I don't live NY , we have shitheel gov now in the west

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] civil_drive@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Chuck Schumer is the biggest coward on either side of the Mississippi

[–] Ledericas@lemm.ee 1 points 9 hours ago

Isn't he the cousin of Amy Schumer who stole jokes, looks like something runs in the family

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›