this post was submitted on 17 Mar 2025
3 points (54.8% liked)

Mildly Interesting

19280 readers
33 users here now

This is for strictly mildly interesting material. If it's too interesting, it doesn't belong. If it's not interesting, it doesn't belong.

This is obviously an objective criteria, so the mods are always right. Or maybe mildly right? Ahh.. what do we know?

Just post some stuff and don't spam.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] seathru 18 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

What a dumb article. The law that bans kinder surprise eggs in the US predates their existence by over 30 years.

Edit: This is the reason: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elixir_sulfanilamide

[–] SolOrion@sh.itjust.works 7 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I'm confused, they never said it was in reaction to specifically kinder surprise eggs?

These little treats full of joy are banned in the United States because, in 1938, a law was passed prohibiting the sale of confectionary items containing "non-nutritive objects," and the Kinder Surprise's plastic capsule, which holds the toy, is considered just that.

[–] otp@sh.itjust.works 4 points 4 days ago

a law was passed prohibiting the sale of confectionary items containing "non-nutritive objects,"

If only they could see our foods now. If the crap we put into our foods on purpose wasn't enough, think about all the microplastics! Lol

[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 10 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Short answer: American kids are too dumbto not choke on toys.

[–] Drusas@fedia.io 8 points 4 days ago (1 children)

All kids are idiots--even the smart ones.

[–] otp@sh.itjust.works 1 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (3 children)

Do you mean all American kids? Because these aren't banned worldwide...

[–] lovely_reader@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Per the article, "accidents are rare but tragic." So kids with access to these—i.e. non-American kids—do occasionally choke on them.

[–] Asfalttikyntaja@sopuli.xyz 0 points 2 days ago

But you can give a gun to your toddler? Apparently “accidents are rare but tragic” doesn’t stand for guns?

[–] B0NK3RS@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago

No no, I'm not American and my kids are definitely idiots...

[–] Drusas@fedia.io 1 points 3 days ago

No. I don't.

[–] Wxfisch@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago

Not really though. I get you're trying to be funny (and kids are idiots) but it's pretty simply that confectioneries can't contain non-nutritive items and the toy fully surrounded by chocolate is exactly that. There's very good reasons for the law, but it means treats like this get caught in the crossfire. There's very FDA has agreed in that past there likely isn't a large risk to kinder eggs, but the law is how it is and hasn't been changed (and it seems unlikely that it will in the near future at least).

[–] SolidShake@lemmy.world 4 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

But they do sell them lol. My kids get them

Nvm these are different

[–] Coelacanth@feddit.nu 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I used love these as a kid. Very varying quality of toys in them though it needs to be said. Sometimes you'd get like a 10-piece mini jigsaw puzzle and feel absolutely robbed.

Always thought it had weirdly delicious chocolate, too.

[–] vpol@lemm.ee 2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

In my childhood they used to have much better toys. Even whole series of cartoon characters.

[–] bus_factor@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago

The series of cartoon character collectibles were such a disappointment, though. If it's not assembled from at least 7 weirdly bendy plastic parts it's not a proper kinder surprise toy!

Also the old 2-part eggs were the only proper ones. The new ones where both parts are tethered together are probably better in a few technical ways, but the old ones were so satisfying to open! And you could fill them with water and baking powder and use the explosion to launch little pebbles straight up.