this post was submitted on 17 Mar 2025

343 points (99.1% liked)

World News

44139 readers

3352 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Rule 1: posts have the following requirements:
- Post news articles only
- Video links are NOT articles and will be removed.
- Title must match the article headline
- Not United States Internal News
- Recent (Past 30 Days)
- Screenshots/links to other social media sites (Twitter/X/Facebook/Youtube/reddit, etc.) are explicitly forbidden, as are link shorteners.
Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. The key points in 1-2 paragraphs is allowed (even encouraged!), but large segments of articles posted in the body will result in the post being removed. If you have to stop and think "Is this fair use?", it probably isn't. Archive links, especially the ones created on link submission, are absolutely allowed but those that avoid paywalls are not.
Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed. Sources that have a Low or Very Low factual reporting rating or MBFC Credibility Rating may be removed.
Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudiced.
Posts and comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service UPDATED AS OF 10/19
Rule 5: Keep it civil. It's OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It's NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, misinformation, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.
Rule 7: We didn't USED to need a rule about how many posts one could make in a day, then someone posted NINETEEN articles in a single day. Not comments, FULL ARTICLES. If you're posting more than say, 10 or so, consider going outside and touching grass. We reserve the right to limit over-posting so a single user does not dominate the front page.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world

Recommendations

How to spot Misinformation and Propaganda

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

Consider including the article’s mediabiasfactcheck.com/ link

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

NewsAutoMod@lemmy.world

jordanlund@lemmy.world

Tenthrow@lemmy.world

little_cow@lemmy.world

lemmyAtom@lemmy.world

343

Antarctic scientists plead for help after ‘sexual assault and threats’ by colleague (www.telegraph.co.uk)

submitted 1 day ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/world@lemmy.world

75 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Summary

A South African scientist at the remote Sanae IV Antarctic base has been accused of sexual assault and violent threats, prompting urgent pleas for help.

The 10-person team is stranded for months due to extreme winter conditions. Officials were warned of the escalating situation as early as December but failed to act.

South Africa’s environment department has launched an investigation and is offering counseling.

The incident raises concerns over psychological screening for Antarctic missions, echoing past violent incidents in South Africa’s research programs.

top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] null_dot@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 2 hours ago

this article says physical assault, not sexual.

“An intervention is in place,” he said. “The person who assaulted the team leader is remorseful and has been psychologically re-evaluated willingly.” Asked what triggered the alleged assault, George said: “It was a dispute over a task the team leader wanted the team to do – a weather-dependent task that required a schedule change.”

[–] werefreeatlast@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago

The articles is so interesting! Why not have our greatest heroe leaders enjoy some of this peaceful resort-like friendly environment? Orange man would absolute love it. Swasticman too would love the outdoors! There, the white snow is powerful! One might say it has white....maybe one might not say that, wink, wink! C'mon O man and S man, go check it out! Maybe clean up DEI over there?

[–] Vagabond@lemm.ee 33 points 17 hours ago (2 children)

You would imagine the people that go to Antarctica are prepared to be self reliant. It's 9 vs 1. You could institute a little ice justice (beat him) and lock him in a room.

[–] JacksonLamb@lemmy.world 16 points 14 hours ago

Carry around a hammer?

Realistically they are probably appealing for outside help because the ones who take this seriously don't have the numbers.

[–] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 16 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

if I was locked in a building with a documented rapist for three months, I would lock him in the walk-in-freezer.

[–] flicker@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Ya'll are kinder than I am. I say put him outside and let the problem solve itself.

[–] the_butsmuts@lemmy.blahaj.zone 20 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

In Antarctica, outside is the walk-in freezer

[–] SpruceBringsteen@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago

I think their mess hall actually heats their fridge.

[–] Lightsong@lemmy.world 10 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

So it would be walk-out freezer then? 👀

[–] werefreeatlast@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago

I agree to both.

[–] AidsKitty@lemmy.world 1 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

First of all these are allegations. An investigation should be conducted to gather all evidence to see if charges should be filed.

[–] null_dot@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 2 hours ago

South Africa’s environment minister, Dion George, whose department manages the country’s Antarctic programme, confirmed that an assault had taken place and that he was “considering options”, without specifying what these were.

... so not merely allegations.

[–] the_riviera_kid@lemmy.world 102 points 1 day ago (6 children)

I would think frontier justice would apply nicely in this situation. Just boot the asshole out in the cold and nature will solve the problem for you.

[–] courageousstep@lemm.ee 57 points 1 day ago (15 children)

Women and some other minorities are raised to not even consider using acts of violence to protect ourselves, like it never crosses our minds as a possibility that we could physically hurt an assailant if we wanted to. We have internalized a sense of weakness that isn’t actually true. This has been detrimental to our safety as well as the safety of other women. Fuck the patriarchy for doing this to us.

[–] JacksonLamb@lemmy.world 7 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Don't put this on the victims. Women are doing their best to defend themselves.

Unfortunately there's a culture of sexual assault at Antarctica, where the "boys will be boys" crowd overrule the kind of thing @the_riviera_kid@lemmy.world just suggested.

[–] courageousstep@lemm.ee 9 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

I never once blamed the victims. And I never will.

[–] JacksonLamb@lemmy.world 8 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

My point is that the women being sexually assaulted in Antarctica haven't been passively sitting there saying it "never crossed their mind" to protect themselves - one had to walk around for months wielding a hammer to use as a weapon against her assailant.

It's the wider system down there and the rape culture society that is creating this system not some kind of passive internaluzed helplessness. Most women field scientists are tough as nails because they have to be.

[–] cool@lemmings.world 1 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago) (1 children)

rape culture society

Stop putting faith in shitty people if we want rape culture to stop. Too many times I see people complain about "rape culture" when hanging around scumbags (jocks, gangbangers, scammers). Find better influence, value different things, and have higher standards.

Rape culture only exists because we allow it to.

[–] JacksonLamb@lemmy.world 5 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago) (1 children)

people complain about “rape culture” when hanging around scumbags

Are you saying thst women scientists shouldn't "hang around" Antarctica?

Because that's fucked up and another example of putting the emphasis on the victims actions.

Rape culture only exists because we allow it to.

NOW you're on the right track. We as societies should be stepping down a lot harder on this crap.

[–] cool@lemmings.world 2 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (1 children)

I'm referring to the macrocosm of rape culture outside of Antarctica.

We need to be willing to recognize and ostracize scumbags and womanizers. Unfortunately, we tend to elevate them to the highest positions of power in our social circles.

That needs to change.

[–] JacksonLamb@lemmy.world 2 points 8 hours ago

I completely agree with you on that.

[–] SirEDCaLot@lemmy.today 9 points 20 hours ago (2 children)

Absolutely 100%. I think basic self-defense should be a required course in middle school or high school, especially for women. And I would encourage any woman or any person for that matter to take charge of their personal defense, in whatever way is most comfortable for them. Carry a gun, carry a taser, carry pepper spray, take martial arts classes like Krav, etc.

[–] cool@lemmings.world 2 points 10 hours ago

A gun is pretty much the best solution, especially for a woman.

Tasers, pepper spray, martial arts, etc don't always work and usually serve to just piss off your assailant.

I keep saying this: women and minorities should be the ones owning the most guns, not white males.

[–] HellsBelle@sh.itjust.works 11 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago) (10 children)

Schools should be teaching boys to respect women and not believe they have a 'right' to women's bodies.

If we hit the source of the problem it can be fixed ... and the source is not women, it's boys/men.

[–] cool@lemmings.world -3 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

Schools should be teaching boys to respect women and not believe they have a ‘right’ to women’s bodies.

What? This has nothing to do with schooling.

Every time you see a woman get womanized, it just tells all the men that they don't need to try as hard to get with her.

Womanizers are successful because there's a significant portion of women who want to be womanized. Look at all your personal experiences for no shortage of evidence to back this up.

Women need to have higher standards and stop putting their faith in obvious scumbags if they want culture to change. Too many women expect guys to "mac" on them and assume the guys who don't aren't interested. It's rhetoric that they proudly spew to each other without realizing the damage it does.

"If he's not talking to you, you can believe he's talking to someone else!" This kind of stuff is a load of bullshit and only serves to give womanizers an edge over better people.

"It's easier to fool someone than to convince them they'd been fooled" - Mark Twain. This is true because the women who put their faith in shitty men don't want to admit they valued the wrong things or have been taken for a ride, so they just keep going. Their "friends" who are doing the same thing also don't want to admit it or change.

Before you people get mad at me for "blaming the victim," try to understand that avoiding holding women accountable for their actions contributes to idea of viewing them as helpless children.

load more comments (9 replies)

[–] CheeseToastie@lazysoci.al 21 points 1 day ago (6 children)

Plus fear of being believed, self blame and feeling of needing to be polite.

load more comments (6 replies)

[–] the_riviera_kid@lemmy.world 17 points 23 hours ago (5 children)

I am sad for the way you were raised, in my entire extended family there is not one woman who would have put up with it or had any thought other than self-defense at whatever cost.

load more comments (5 replies)

load more comments (11 replies)

[–] SARGE@startrek.website 33 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Exactly what I was thinking.

When you're cut off from any help, you ARE your own help. Don't wait for something unthinkable to happen, this person has made it clear they don't respect you or boundaries, and have made threats.

It's 9v1, if you're scared just wait until they're asleep. Kick them out the door, lock it, and they can try walking their happy ass back to civilization. from Antarctica

Don't bother looking for a body.

load more comments (1 replies)

load more comments (4 replies)

[–] anindefinitearticle@sh.itjust.works 34 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I've seen enough scifi to know that (ant)arctic research stations ought to have a quarantine area so that ill crewmembers can be compassionately kept alive separated from those they might harm while still having access to life support in a hostile environment.

[–] tomatolung@sopuli.xyz 19 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Antarctic builds are costly, difficult, and filled with challenges you don't see in daily life, so while that might seem like a simple idea, it's about half as hard as as putting it on the space station, with a 10th or less the budget.

load more comments (3 replies)

[–] tomatolung@sopuli.xyz 28 points 1 day ago

I believe it's a remote station/environment issue based on my working in Antarctic and on Research ships.

NSF finally saw the light after it was forced down their throat, and they still haven't resolved it.

https://apnews.com/article/women-working-antarctica-sexual-harassment-assault-mcmurdo-ba0e550fddf1ab0afd031ff4d25143cb

load more comments