120
It's not a labour shortage though. Pay people more and they'll come work.
Nursing homes cost $9k a month and they pack them in like sardines. I'm sure they can pay $5/hr more and add a few more staff.
Shareholders don't like that. How dare you even point that out!
If you're lucky it's 9k. It was about 13k for my mom before she died. We feel it was a mistake to do that and we pulled her out because we could take better care of her at home with some hired help for when we were exhausted.
The CNAs were understaffed, undertrained and underpaid and had to deal with some literally crazy people wacked out from dementia and other brain rot that wrote simply made them violent and angry. The people that have to endure that daily need to be paid more, period. We need to start telling our kids that if they want to serve the country, don't go into them military - go into healthcare. I'd story giving them an equivalent to the GI Bill.
This is great!
Right now there is a serious issue with discharging patients from the hospital environment into skilled care. Since COVID, many nursing homes don't take admissions over the weekend, limit admissions to long term care (as opposed to transitional care which is short term - and better reimbursed), and often have wait times. This has the effect of increasing the length of time a patient is in the hospital unnecessarily, thus decreasing hospital capacity.
Yes, the nursing homes have staffing issues, but they pay for shit. Many of them pay less than $20/hour. You need to goto school to get your CNA license which isn't free. You can get many other jobs for better pay without the investment of education.
Source: I am a hospitalist physician. I work with nursing homes a great deal and my wife used to work at one as a CNA.
My other half works in a nursing home. They contract out their nursing, and that contractor pays $16 per hour for CNA's. You could go nearly anywhere in the local city and make that much, or more, and you won't have to clean the shit off grandpa.
Wow, scholarships and tuition reimbursement meaning it’s not free. How the fuck is that an incentive? How about raise the pay so caregivers aren’t living out of their car? Or tent? I hate this tone deaf bullshit. The incentive is to pay someone what it’s worth to put up with someone’s demented abusive grandpa. Pay up or it will be taken from you. Not a threat. Just a fact of human nature.
Thank God at least something is being done about this. I don't think it's perfect, because I feel like the requirements they're imposing will barely help most patients deal with basic daily tasks. Even so this is way better than little to no coverage at all.
Fucking good, but not nearly far enough, IMO. I work in EMS, done it for 13 years. Almost anyone working in EMS can tell you some horror stories about almost any nursing home in their area, I know I can. They're basically medicare farms, and the elderly and disabled are the livestock.
Used to work in EMS, now just a lowly vollie, can't agree with you more. I'd rather die before going to a nursing home, even the good ones. Those of us in EMS see the things no one else sees, we see what the state doesn't see when they do their inspections, we see what is hidden from the families. But when we speak up, does anyone ever listen to us? Nope. I don't know how any "civilised" society can be ok with treating their elderly the way we treat ours. Places where if you are standing in one place you have to keep shifting from foot to foot because if you actually stand still your boots will stick to the floor, residents in beds with sheets that look like they haven't been changed in weeks, people crying for help all through the hallways, and just the general neglect and ignorance by staff, and when you do get staff who aren't burned out and still care they are so overwhelmed by the patient ratios there's still only so much they can do.
My wife worked at an assisted living facility for a while and it's no better. Plus they'd frequently delay transferring patients who really needed to be in a nursing home to try to squeeze an extra month or two out of them, leading to patients being more often transferred to hospice care than a nursing home
The amount of BS that occurred leads me to believe it's either an unsustainable business model that pushes assisted living and nursing homes to be so terrible or a severe lack of government oversight and consequences for facilities that allows them to be so scummy
It's an unsustainable business model for profit.
"In 2005, private equity-owned firms owned less than 1 percent of skilled nursing facilities. By 2015, they owned 9 percent; the share is likely higher today.
Purchases of nursing homes by private equity firms are associated with higher patient mortality rates, fewer caregivers, higher management fees, and a decline in patient mobility."
https://www.nber.org/digest/202104/how-patients-fare-when-private-equity-funds-acquire-nursing-homes
Squeezing profit out of the end of elderly people's lives is an extra special level of disgusting
Private equity tries not to ruin anything it touches challenge (impossible)
Interesting requirements. 9 patients max per CNA is very reasonable in SNF staffing.
this post was submitted on 01 Sep 2023
120 points (99.2% liked)
News
23305 readers
5038 users here now
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.
Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.
7. No duplicate posts.
If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners.
The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS