this post was submitted on 21 Mar 2025
878 points (99.3% liked)

politics

22202 readers
3168 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.) called for Democrats to elect “brawlers” who fight for the working class to counter GOP power and oppose policies endorsed by figures like Elon Musk.

Speaking alongside Sen. Bernie Sanders in Las Vegas, she criticized Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer for not filibustering a GOP spending bill and labeled the decision a “tremendous mistake.”

Ocasio-Cortez urged voters to support candidates willing to take bold stances.

She continues her “Fighting Oligarchy” tour with Sanders across Nevada, Colorado, and Arizona.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] BigMacHole@lemm.ee 4 points 1 day ago

She's RIGHT! Which is why I'm GLAD the DNC is tapping Known Fighters JOE BIDEN and KAMALA HARRIS to come back!

[–] octopus_ink@slrpnk.net 165 points 3 days ago (6 children)

And she's fucking right.

Nancy Pelosi has got to go.

The boomers except for Bernie have got to go. (which does not include Nancy, she's fucking silent generation)

We need ACTUAL young blood, not 74-years-young.

[–] PalmTreeIsBestTree@lemmy.world 33 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Bernie is so old that he’s a Silent Generation and not even a Boomer, however Bernie has more energy and larger backbone than most Democrats ever have had.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ilinamorato@lemmy.world 41 points 3 days ago (6 children)

Honestly I think Bernie should go too. He deserves a good retirement after a long career of solid work. We need people in office who can run the show for the next thirty years.

[–] distantsounds@lemmy.world 78 points 3 days ago (4 children)

The Democratic Party has been saying Bernie is too old for over 10 years and yet he’s still has more energy & competency than 95% of the lot. He absolutely deserves a good retirement but he’ll never get that.

[–] ilinamorato@lemmy.world 29 points 3 days ago (1 children)

He's doing a great job. When I say Pelosi and Schumer should go, it's because they're cowards at best and traitors at worst and they should be replaced by young people who are...not those things. When I say Sanders should go, it's because he's done a great job, he deserves a vacation and the opportunity to write his memoirs, and there should be someone younger at the ready to take the mantle.

[–] MelodiousFunk@slrpnk.net 18 points 3 days ago (14 children)

he's done a great job, he deserves a vacation and the opportunity to write his memoirs

There's no vacation/retirement from social justice. All the things that riled you up and made you fight back against the ownership class are going to go on as they were. You can't just sit back and relax. Do I think he deserves some peace and quiet? Of course. Is he going to get any? Sadly, I don't believe so. He's been fighting the good fight his entire life...

there should be someone younger at the ready to take the mantle.

...and that includes leading by example. Him stepping back doesn't mean we get a younger Bernie as a replacement. He's been doing this long enough that there should be plenty of younger Bernies, not even waiting in the wings, but in active government. But there aren't. The closest we got is AOC. And we could use a few dozen like her.

Bernie isn't holding anyone back. It would be odd if he was. When he goes, he's likely to be replaced by a milquetoast neolib at best.

[–] ilinamorato@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

There's no vacation/retirement from social justice.

He doesn't have to fight in this way until he dies. He needs to select a successor, he needs to make sure that the next generation can continue the work, he needs to pass on what he's learned. Lives have chapters, and he needs to be free to flip to the next one: being an elder statesman.

Do I think he deserves some peace and quiet? Of course. Is he going to get any? Sadly, I don't believe so. He's been fighting the good fight his entire life...

Oh, I definitely believe he's continuing because he has to. I wish it wasn't so.

Him stepping back doesn't mean we get a younger Bernie as a replacement.

Certainly not. But Vermont hasn't sent a Republican to Washington since 1989 (unless you count Jeffords in 1994 and 2000, who left the GOP in 2001), and has solidly reelected Sanders (a self-described socialist) to four terms, making it a reasonably safe seat to field a strong progressive voice for.

He's been doing this long enough that there should be plenty of younger Bernies, not even waiting in the wings, but in active government.

Agreed. One problem with this is, of course, gerrymandering; another is that Democrats are staying in office until they're very old. There are plenty of younger Bernies who have tried to get in the game, only to be shut out by establishment Democrats with more money, or by a Republican party that drew the maps to specifically deny leftist voices the chance to be in office.

But there aren't. The closest we got is AOC. And we could use a few dozen like her.

...elected to replace a weak establishment Dem in a very blue state. I agree, but the systemic problems are something we need to really go after if we're not going to do all of this over again every four years.

Bernie isn't holding anyone back.

I don't think he's holding anyone back, at least not actively. I think his presence is just not encouraging the people who could replace him to get in the game.

It would be odd if he was.

Absolutely agree. He really doesn't seem the type.

When he goes, he's likely to be replaced by a milquetoast neolib at best.

There I disagree, but then again I know nothing about Vermont politics.

load more comments (13 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] ALoafOfBread@lemmy.ml 16 points 3 days ago

He deserves it, but he is staying alive by sheer force of patriotism and duty. I don't think he knows how or wants to retire. Not while things are still so fucked up

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] RaptorBenn@lemmy.zip 7 points 2 days ago

Some people under 50 yo would be good, do we have age distrubution data for the dem party?

[–] Etterra@discuss.online 36 points 2 days ago

Yes. Go primary Chuck out of office and make somebody with a fucking spine the minority leader.

[–] goferking0 31 points 2 days ago (7 children)

And DNC says it's time to just be turtles.

Please let dnc finally clean house

[–] tiefling@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 2 days ago

Turtles is too kind. It's more like fainting goats

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] grumuk@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Until they're willing to take off the gloves and directly and publicly attack corrupt Democrats, this is just noise. I'm done voting for Democrats. We need a new party.

[–] IfIonlyhadaBrain@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I interject reality into my wants. The reality is, and this cannot be understated, we must unite behind WHOEVER has a chance of beating the fascist oligarchy. Priorities people, priorities. Your statement, when enacted is partly how we arrived where we are now.

Edit: Just to be clear. I absolutely agree with her and I also agree with you. I just will not make it a hard line. Putting our votes behind a losing ticket does not help in this situation since we may have already passed the point of no return in terms of our votes counting. If we don't unite now, I for one am convinced that will be our last chance, IF it even exists.

[–] foggy@lemmy.world 54 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (11 children)

I want AOC, Warren, Jasmine Crockett, and Buttigeg. They have been the only politicians in rank that I've felt have been representing. And Walz, too.

[–] Rooskie91@discuss.online 42 points 3 days ago (10 children)

Don't forget Bernie, he's been going around the country holding how to fight the oligarchy rallies

[–] foggy@lemmy.world 29 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Yeah 😢 It's sad that an 83 year old is one of our strongest fighters. I believe he is also not seeking reelection.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
[–] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 21 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Elizabeth Warren talks a big game, but she shrivels under pressure. I'd love her if she were half the person she claims to be.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
[–] Madison420@lemmy.world 22 points 2 days ago (1 children)

We need to elect communists and socialists from 1910 you know the ones world governments were so goddamn scared of they started multiple wars to try to eradicate the ideal as a whole. Didn't work but they certainly tried anyway.

There's a saying that "you can't shoot an idea."

[–] wanderwisley@lemm.ee 24 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Either this or we seriously need to consider making anew 3rd party.

[–] barneypiccolo@lemm.ee 21 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The Dems don't have to reinvent themselves, and they don't have to lie, cheat, steal, commit treason, and be pedophiles to beat the MAGANazis, they just have to play HARD BALL, and make the MAGANazis fight for every single inch of ground.

[–] wanderwisley@lemm.ee 12 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Yes, exactly this! This is all we ask for have a backbone, have a voice, and stand up.

[–] barneypiccolo@lemm.ee 10 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Many people, especially MAGA Nazis have been misreadinng the latest polls that show dissatisfaction with the Democrats. They think that just because we're pissed at Democrats, we must be supporting MAGAs, and nothing could be further from the truth.

The real answer is that people are pissed at Democrats for decades of being weak, spineless weenies, to the point where the worst possible version of the Republican party, the MAGA Nazis, were finally able to take over our country. But just because people are angry at Dems, doesnt mean they have accepted MAGA Nazism. They just want the Dems to finally grow spines and giant brass balls and FIGHT BACK!

But let the MAGA morons believe they are attracting the Dems to their side. I am seeing signs that some Dems are acting stronger, others will follow, and soon the polls will start rising, and then MAGAWorld will start to panic. Thats when they may get squirelly and really start trouble.

Stay Alert, America needs more Lerts.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] reiterationstation@lemm.ee 21 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Why don’t we just call a new party the free beers during football party and just snatch up all these idiots real quick to win. We win then we give some free beers out the first game then blame the right for making it illegal because they think beer is socialist so no one can have any for free to keep winning. Over and over. Meanwhile we get some healthcare and college.

You don’t have to thank me for my genius steal it and claim it was yours to begin with. You’re welcome.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›