this post was submitted on 21 Mar 2025
846 points (99.3% liked)

politics

22133 readers
4428 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.) called for Democrats to elect “brawlers” who fight for the working class to counter GOP power and oppose policies endorsed by figures like Elon Musk.

Speaking alongside Sen. Bernie Sanders in Las Vegas, she criticized Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer for not filibustering a GOP spending bill and labeled the decision a “tremendous mistake.”

Ocasio-Cortez urged voters to support candidates willing to take bold stances.

She continues her “Fighting Oligarchy” tour with Sanders across Nevada, Colorado, and Arizona.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] foggy@lemmy.world 54 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

I want AOC, Warren, Jasmine Crockett, and Buttigeg. They have been the only politicians in rank that I've felt have been representing. And Walz, too.

[–] Rooskie91@discuss.online 40 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Don't forget Bernie, he's been going around the country holding how to fight the oligarchy rallies

[–] foggy@lemmy.world 29 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yeah 😢 It's sad that an 83 year old is one of our strongest fighters. I believe he is also not seeking reelection.

[–] khannie@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

He's not far off my mother's age and she's doing great so I have that to compare to but jaaayyysus.... I would not want to be fighting as hard as he is at his age. Man deserves some rest.

My grandmother is 82 and is still heavily active in her garden club, church, and spending time with all her family including me.

[–] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 21 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Elizabeth Warren talks a big game, but she shrivels under pressure. I'd love her if she were half the person she claims to be.

[–] cogman@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago

Honestly, I'll take that any day of the week. It's far better than someone like Newsom who is actively courting right wing figureheads so he can agree with them about how bad progressives are.

The party would be so much better if we could get rid of the members that hate progressives.

[–] ArchaicArcana@50501.chat 9 points 1 day ago (4 children)

I would like for them to split off from the party and start a new movement dedicated to fighting for the people. They have the influence to start a way stronger 3rd party than modern is politics has ever seen.

At bare minimum, they should band together as a new sect of the Democratic Party and establish that their ring of the party advocates for people instead of oligarchs.

[–] wewbull@feddit.uk 3 points 15 hours ago

Then you'll have GOP for decades as the non-GOP vote splits between parties.

The US is solidly a two party system and you need to work within it.

[–] arrow74@lemm.ee 12 points 1 day ago

They need to do a progressive takeover of the democratic party. Just like how the MAGA extremists took over the republic party

[–] Rivalarrival@lemmy.today 7 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Exactly this. When the GOP had similar problems, they sparked the "Tea Party" that ended up taking over the party.

We need a "Guillotine Party" to do the same for the Democrats.

[–] wewbull@feddit.uk 1 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

The "tea party" was never a third party. They were a faction of the republican party.

[–] Rivalarrival@lemmy.today 3 points 14 hours ago

Correct. Which is how they avoided the spoiler effect.

[–] ArchaicArcana@50501.chat 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

lol I still would rather they just start a third party, but maybe I could get behind Guillotine Democrats

[–] Rivalarrival@lemmy.today 1 points 14 hours ago

The third party spoiler effect tends to hand elections to the worst option on the ballot. Rebuilding an extant party accomplishes the same intent.

[–] thisphuckinguy@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago

I agree with this. The time to split is now.