this post was submitted on 28 Mar 2025
111 points (89.4% liked)

Linux

52809 readers
507 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I know Gnome is the default on popular distros: Fedora, Ubuntu, Rhel, Pop OS (it's Cosmic Desktop yes but it is still based on Gnome)...etc. But Gnome just doesnt work for me. I would pick XFCE - stable and no BS.

Before Manjaro and their cetificate shenanigan, I used to use their XFCE version. At the time, it was marketed as the "Flagship Manjaro version". I went 4 years without any problems and I did tinker a lot, just couldnt get their XFCE to break.

After a tough Arch or Gentoo installs, I just want to put XFCE on and call it a day.

What about you guys?

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] floppybutton@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 1 week ago

I keep coming back to KDE time and time again. It's so easy to mess with, I can set it up exactly how I like it without much effort, and it always looks good because someone else did all the work making themes and widgets I use.

That said, I love XFCE, I'm just trash with CSS so it takes me forever to get it how I like, and on my Surface I can't get the scaling to work so everything is beyond tiny.

[–] nafzib@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago

KDE for sure. The modern versions look exactly like how I want a desktop environment to look out of the box, and they keep the full range of customizability that a desktop should, IMO, allow it's users to have. Which is something Windows just kept slowly getting rid of over the years.

I also prefer to have a taskbar that is ever present with a traditional start menu that's cleanly organized by category rather than the current full screen pop up "activities" search thing gnome does nowadays.

[–] janus2@lemmy.zip 11 points 1 week ago (4 children)

any computer I need to be stable enough for work/school: KDE

any computer whose primary purpose is for goofing off and gaming: LXQt (and I will spend the entire time configuring LXQt instead of gaming...)

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] ludicolo@lemmy.ml 10 points 1 week ago

KDE the customization is off the charts

[–] secret300 10 points 1 week ago

Gnome for me. I like it

[–] Aelis@lemm.ee 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Always wanted to like gnome but never could, and xfce is fine but I much prefer KDE, it is verry likely that I'll actually keep it till my pc breaks.

[–] easily3667@lemmus.org 8 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

That's the beauty of gnome: they don't give a single fuck if you like it. You can return the favor.

[–] overload@sopuli.xyz 5 points 1 week ago (5 children)

Gnome has the apple philosophy that the user conforms to technology, not the other way around.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] dekuuSkrb@pawb.social 9 points 1 week ago

gnome head all the way!!!

[–] pH3ra@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 week ago

I'd say Gnome, since I'm so used to it that I feel it doesn't get in the way of the things I'm doing.
Because that would be my aim: something that doesn't interfere with the work I am doing.

[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 week ago

KDE, always

Used it since I switched to the Linux Desktop 25 years ago. Quickly tried gnome, and others, and hated it.

KDE is fast, efficient, looks awesome, is ready to work with, and highly customizable

[–] ikidd@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago

Plasma for the last decade. Then probably XFCE, then Cinnamon.

I try Gnome every year or so, but every time I get pissed off with it within a few minutes and wipe it off my machine.

[–] daggermoon@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago

KDE Plasma, I can't go back to SDR

LXQt or XFCE if I have to pick a DE. Fluxbox or openbox if I can get away with just a WM. ;)

[–] harsh3466@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 week ago

If it has to be a de, I'd pick gnome. Otherwise it's hyprland.

[–] potemkinhr@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 week ago

KDE plasma. Coming from 30 years of running exclusively windows it's just the most comfortable and easy for me to use (way more than Gnome). Easily configurable, works. Can't ask for more.

[–] GustavoM@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago (3 children)

I don't mind a little "change" every now and then, but still -- "Sway" on my "potatoes" (Orange pi zero 3 and Orange pi 5 max) and "Hyprland" on my x86_64 PC.

[–] aedyr@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 week ago

My daily driver is Arch running sway. Would be hard to go back from the simplicity and elegance.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] steeznson@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago

XFCE would be my choice too

[–] AceFuzzLord@lemm.ee 7 points 1 week ago

Until my laptop dies or cannot support it, I'm sticking with KDE Plasma. Love how MX configured it (because I'm lazy) and absolutely will keep using it for as long as my laptop survived or can hold it.

Might try other ones in VMs (like ratpoison) in the future for other machines I might set up in the future, but for now KDE Plasma is my go-to that I'll probably be using for a long time.

[–] Drito@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 week ago (3 children)

There is nothing better than Xfce, if you dont like the desktop, at least Xfce allows you to customize. KDE seems interesting, but the last time i tried it, 10 years ago more or less, it was a bit buggy.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] WorkingLemmy@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago
[–] Vopyr@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago

LXQT. Why? Because: It is lightweight, consumes little resources, is quite customizable, and has full Ukrainian localization.

Maybe I'll switch to XFCE/MATE, but not if there are a lot of things not translated, or if the translation is worse than even Google Translate.

[–] Rozauhtuno@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 1 week ago

Xfce, ol' reliable.

[–] enemenemu@lemm.ee 6 points 1 week ago

Difficult. Paperwm/ Niri has the best workflow.

I am looking forward to set niri as compositor on cosmic.

[–] DarkMetatron@feddit.org 6 points 1 week ago

LXQT or KDE I just like the QT look and feel.

GNOME is great in general but not for me, it is too much MacOS alike and too limited for my liking.

[–] Artopal@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 week ago
[–] TheGreenWizard@lemmy.zip 5 points 1 week ago

I'm a cog in the machine and use KDE, but xfce is awesome, I would use xfce if I couldn't use KDE.

[–] A_norny_mousse@feddit.org 5 points 1 week ago

The one I'm using right now of course!

[–] ThunderLegend@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 week ago (5 children)

XFCE. It's lightweight, easy to tweak and looks great. I run it on my 6 y.o. potato laptop

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] neatobuilds@lemmy.today 5 points 1 week ago

Whatever I can hit the super key and type what program I want. If it can open a browser steam or dark table, the rest doesn't matter much. I was on crunchbang++ then popOS then fedora now I'm on arch with hyprland

[–] umbrella@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 week ago

i'm already doing this with gnome lol.

if my computer was older, probably xfce.

[–] adarza@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

it's probably gonna be plasma6 by a hair over cinnamon on a rolling distribution. as much as people shit on manjaro here and on that other site, it has never broke on me--whether i update constantly or let it go 2-3 months between them.

but if the de and the underlying os are magically compatible, and those and programs kept up to date, never obsolete, and new ones appear for it as needed or desired... then sorry, it won't be linux... i'm going back to something like 95osr2, 98se or w2k.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] lapping147@lemm.ee 5 points 1 week ago

I'm in either terminal or browser most of the time, DE is not an issue for me... KDE has an easy battery life optimization feature for laptops, so I guess I'll go KDE

[–] 6R1MR34P3R@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 week ago

KDE Plasma for ease of use if using Nvidia Otherwise Hyprland or exwm

[–] Wojwo@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 week ago

KDE plasma, unless it's on a tablet, then Gnome

[–] piefood@piefed.social 5 points 1 week ago (5 children)

I've been using spectrwm for over a decade https://github.com/conformal/spectrwm and have no plans to change

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] syklemil@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I used Ratpoison for well over a decade, and only replaced it with sway once I had a new machine and figured it was time to try Wayland. Apparently that's some 4-5 years ago already.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] the16bitgamer@programming.dev 5 points 1 week ago

Cinnamon for 2 reasons

  1. KDE is missing a lot of features which still only works in Gnome. Like the taskbar Calendar app syncing events with services like Google Calendar

  2. cinnamon is extremely stable and doesn’t move your icons around when you connect to an external display with your laptop and the display has a different resolution.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›