United States | News & Politics

2810 readers

829 users here now

Welcome to !usa@midwest.social, where you can share and converse about the different things happening all over/about the United States.

If you’re interested in participating, please subscribe.

Rules

Be respectful and civil. No racism/bigotry/hateful speech.

Post anything related to the United States.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

simsymbiote@midwest.social

Type1@midwest.social

France’s new high-speed train design has Americans asking: Why can’t we have that? (grist.org)

submitted 1 week ago by Sunshine@lemmy.ca to c/usa@midwest.social

13 comments fedilink hide all child comments

top 13 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] TwinTitans@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Canadian here, also asking why can’t we have this.

[–] UristMcHolland@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago

Especially considering all of your major cities are in a straight line.

[–] Tinidril@midwest.social 4 points 1 week ago

American here. We know exactly why we can't have this.

[–] ohulancutash@feddit.uk 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

No prior experience in building and operating high speed rail.
Track standards must be much higher.
Track must be completely secure from people and animals, and geology. This means high fences and shallow cuttings set far back from the running lines.
The line can only be crossed by bridges or tunnels. No level crossings.
Long distances pose issues in crew turnaround.
Track must be as straight and flat as possible. North America has space, but also has geography.
Reliable catenary power supply.

[–] WrenFeathers@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

Is it because you can’t have high speed rail in the 1800’s? I’ll bet it’s because you can’t have high speed rail in the 1800’s.

[+] entwine413@lemm.ee -10 points 1 week ago (4 children)

I'd imagine it's because the US is 18x bigger than France.

[–] Sunshine@lemmy.ca 13 points 1 week ago (1 children)

America is the richest country on earth and has the third largest population. They can have high speed rail.

[+] entwine413@lemm.ee -9 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Maybe in metropolitan areas, but your high speed rail isn't going to be very high speed if it has to stop at 3 dozen small towns between two metropolitan areas.

Again, the US is huge. Take Texas for example, it can take upwards of 16 hours to drive from one side to another.

[–] SwingingTheLamp@midwest.social 8 points 1 week ago

Enough of this bogus argument. It's incredibly dumb. Why? Because rail doesn't have to serve every podunk, desert town in west Texas (even though a railroad is why they exist in the first place!) to be useful. The Amtrak Acela route runs from one tiny hamlet called Washington, D.C., to a ghost town called Boston, stopping in between at some backwater nobody's ever heard of called New York. Why isn't that a high-speed rail line?

Or, as Ray pointed out in one of his City Nerd videos, the Great Lakes region is about the same size as Spain, and has more people living in it. Spain has a built-out HSR network. Why don't we? There's plenty of demand. Amtrak added the Borealis train last year because the Empire Builder was overbooked, and it immediately exceeded ridership projections.

[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 week ago

Do you not understand how high-speed rail systems work, and how it tiers down from major hubs, to regional, to local, and how train transfers work? All of the trains in Japan aren’t Shinkansens. This is like suggesting that you should have point-to-point flights for literally every city - an obviously absurd and wasteful idea.

[–] astutemural@midwest.social 4 points 1 week ago

So it's an even better use case for high-speed rail, is what you're saying.

[–] Tinidril@midwest.social 3 points 1 week ago

If you compare the US to Europe as a whole, there isn't a whole lot of difference. Europe also has many different countries with far more autonomy than US states, yet somehow they are all connected with a far better rail system than the US.

[–] GissaMittJobb@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 week ago

It's true, the U.S is too large for cars. Everyone needs to have their own personal airplane and use it for all trips since the country is so large, this is the only solution that can adequately serve all trips and hence must be the exclusive option