this post was submitted on 29 Apr 2025
775 points (99.1% liked)

Political Memes

7966 readers
2298 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

No AI generated content.Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Rucifer@sh.itjust.works 89 points 5 days ago (5 children)

They don’t read the Bible.

[–] rocket_dragon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 39 points 5 days ago (1 children)

They will cherrypick a few passages that are unique to the KJV.

You know, the specifically pro-monarchy version of the bible.

[–] reseller_pledge609@lemmy.dbzer0.com 23 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

Yeah, I'm not American and English isn't my first language.

Because of this I was never aware of how many English translations of the bible there are. I also don't understand how anyone would want to stick to a translation as old and outdated as the KJV when we have multiple more modern and likely more accurate translations available today.

Yet SOMEHOW these American conservatives swear by the KJV and refuse to accept that other translations are likely more accurate and better to use.

Some even believe the KJV is the only perfect translation apparently. No other translation is allowed or even considered. I saw a video of a pastor saying that the KJV fixes the source texts. Wtf kinda logic is that?

Sorry for the rant. Feel free to ignore it.

[–] rocket_dragon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 22 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Don't apologize, you're spot on.

To put it simply, the don't like the teachings of Jesus. What they want is a metaphysical justification for oppressing other people. It's a tool of the privileged and the powerful - the very ones Jesus spoke out against. :)

[–] reseller_pledge609@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Yeah I recently got into reading my bible more and so far I love what I'm reading about Jesus and his teachings. I think he'd be very upset if he had to meet most of his "followers", though.

[–] eestileib@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Jesus-from-Matthew (you know, the one written closest to the alleged events) is definitely my least-disliked NT main character.

Too bad Jesus-from-John (and fucking Paul) are who actually gets worshipped.

The bit where Matthew-Jesus says that preachers are like whitewashed tombs, shining on the outside and crawling with the most disgusting filth on the inside... 🧑🏼‍🍳🤌🏼

[–] gabereal@sopuli.xyz 5 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Mark is the generally-recognized first Gospel to be written, from which Matthew and Luke get some of their material

[–] eestileib@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 5 days ago

Ah thank you for the correction.

Sorry Chaplain Lent, I made you look bad in front of Lemmy.

[–] reseller_pledge609@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Still gotta check out each version. I've only read Luke so far. Looking forward to comparing Matthew and John now.

[–] eestileib@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Jesus has a massive punishment kink pretty much across the board; for a character who is pitched as bringing universal love, he's really really into describing exactly how he's going to throw most people into an endless pit of burning shit.

There's good stuff too, including excellent sales advice (parable of the fig tree, the mustard seeds).

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] rocket_dragon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Yeah unfortunately they are the pharisees and Roman soldiers of the 21st century.

Don't say that too loudly. Most of them have such a hard-on for Roman times and anything military that being called a Roman soldier might just make them think they're some kind of modern-day warrior instead of recognising it for the insult it's meant to be.

[–] PapaStevesy@lemmy.world 27 points 5 days ago (1 children)

And even if they did, modern Christians just handwave away as meaningless anything in the Old Testament they can't justify because it's been "fulfilled by Jesus".

[–] njm1314@lemmy.world 12 points 5 days ago (7 children)

It's not like they even care what Jesus said either.

load more comments (7 replies)

That's for sure. If they did, they would be very upset.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] refurbishedrefurbisher 14 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

James 5:1-6

Now listen, you rich people, weep and wail because of the misery that is coming on you. Your wealth has rotted, and moths have eaten your clothes. Your gold and silver are corroded. Their corrosion will testify against you and eat your flesh like fire. You have hoarded wealth in the last days. Look! The wages you failed to pay the workers who mowed your fields are crying out against you. The cries of the harvesters have reached the ears of the Lord Almighty. You have lived on earth in luxury and self-indulgence. You have fattened yourselves in the day of slaughter.[a] You have condemned and murdered the innocent one, who was not opposing you.

[–] Sibshops@lemm.ee 41 points 5 days ago (3 children)

Conservatives love to ignore that the Bible is actually pretty woke.

[–] Sc00ter@lemm.ee 37 points 5 days ago (2 children)

My in laws are extremely religious and comservative and biggoted. This year at easter, my wife volunteered to pray. She had a bunch of verses like the one in this post and just ripped them through bible teachings that theyre dicks. It was awesome

[–] InvertedParallax@lemm.ee 12 points 5 days ago

I, too, choose this guy's wife.

If you're willing, I'd love to learn more about the specific verses as well as their reactions.

[–] NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world 13 points 5 days ago (11 children)

Except the old testament, God constantly wants pepple to sacrifie their kids, stone people to death, etc. He's not a nice dude.

[–] AdamBomb 7 points 5 days ago (1 children)

There’s lots of woke stuff in the OT too. The above passage is from the OT. Entire chapters are dedicated to describing an economic system where capital can only be gained temporarily, then it reverts to the original owners’ family in Jubilee years. AFAIK it was never actually implemented though.

[–] josefo@leminal.space 1 points 4 days ago

According to the bible, while living on the promised land, until they demanded God a king, so they could be like the other nations, during the Judges book, they were effectively a stateless society organized by families and cities. Land had no rulers. Only during that time the system you recall was fully in place. After that time, they kept doing some things, but the system effectively transitioned to a monarchy. God's words to Samuel (the contemporary judge they didn't want) are indeed hard: "they haven't rejected you, they rejected me".

Finally, god himself gets down here and starts an organization. The primitive church was an anarchist community, you don't get more woke than that.

Yup, god is woke. Also an anarchist, clearly against hierarchy and other pyramid schemes like capitalism.

Some english names or expression might be wrong, I haven't looked at english bible for a while.

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] LeninOnAPrayer@lemm.ee 9 points 5 days ago

The bible is a fragmented mess of retranslations and secondary source material. Leviticus also has the verse about homosexuality that these idiots love to point to too.

It's definitely just a mess of contradictions. I wouldn't say "woke". Jesus was pretty woke throughout. Though some gospels more than others.

As a Jewish person, Israelis could also learn a lot from this

...Love them as yourself, for you were foreigners in Egypt. I am the Lord your God.

[–] Brown5500@sh.itjust.works 13 points 5 days ago

Does this mean it's antisemitic to deport foreigners?

[–] griff@lemmings.world 10 points 5 days ago

more WOKE rubbish!!!

[–] rickyrigatoni@lemm.ee 7 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Leviticus is the same part of the bible that tells people gays go to hell. And people who eat shellfish.

[–] gedaliyah@lemmy.world 14 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Fun fact: hell is not mentioned in the Old Testament. Christians came up with eternal burning damnation all on their own.

You are right that the (likely) prohibition on some form of homosexuality is the exact same (likely) prohibition against shellfish and pork.

[–] andros_rex@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago

It’s an influence from Greek though - lots of early Christianity is Plato/other Greek philosophers + Judaism.

[–] Shardikprime@lemmy.world 6 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I mean this was a time where people had legally codified indentured slavery for a certain time frame.

You or your family could sell yourself to work for 7 years and then after that you could choose to keep working there after a jubilee year or go to another master.

Usually most people who did this were foreigners.

People owned those guys. Powerful people with money to be able to keep indentured slaves.

So it makes sense to suggest people to treat these persons well. They might be slaves to a rich guy who already pays for them and doesn't want to have to spend more.

So yeah, treat them well

[–] Gloomy@mander.xyz 7 points 5 days ago

You are right, but the details are a bit of.

So there were two kinda of slavery. For Israeli the concept of indentured slavery was applied: 7 years and then you were free. But if you married during that time and had children, your wife and children remeined slaves.

So masters tried to find wife's for their indentured slaves, because most likley people won't leave back their family after 7 years. So Israeli slaves could pledge themselves to their masters for live.

When you buy a male Hebrew slave, he shall serve six years, but in the seventh he shall go out a free person, without debt. 3 If he comes in single, he shall go out single; if he comes in married, then his wife shall go out with him. 4 If his master gives him a wife and she bears him sons or daughters, the wife and her children shall be her master’s, and he shall go out alone. 5 But if the slave declares, ‘I love my master, my wife, and my children; I will not go out a free person,’ 6 then his master shall bring him before God. He shall be brought to the door or the doorpost, and his master shall pierce his ear with an awl, and he shall serve him for life.

Exodus 21:2-11

For non Israeli (Gentils) their was just plain and simple slavery.

44 As for the male and female slaves whom you may have, it is from the nations around you that you may acquire male and female slaves. 45 You may also acquire them from among the aliens residing with you and from their families who are with you who have been born in your land; they may be your property. 46 You may keep them as a possession for your children after you, for them to inherit as property. These you may treat as slaves, but as for your fellow Israelites, no one shall rule over the other with harshness.

Leviticus 25:44-46

[–] rational_lib@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

leviticus 19:35

Do not use dishonest standards when measuring length, weight or quantity

Oh man the US is really fucked

[–] Shardikprime@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago

On the contrary, the United States is one of the few countries in the world that has real standards for things.

There is standard peanut butter, standard dirt, even standard earwax or standard urine contaminants

All thanks to the all powerful NIST

[–] BlackSheep@lemmy.ca 1 points 4 days ago

Matthew 19:24

load more comments
view more: next ›