this post was submitted on 02 May 2025
10 points (100.0% liked)

Transgender

637 readers
194 users here now

Overview:

The Lemmy place to discuss the news and experiences of transgender people.


Rules:

  1. Keep discussions civil.

  2. Arguments against transgender rights will be removed.

  3. No bigotry is allowed - including transphobia, homophobia, speciesism, racism, sexism, classism, ableism, castism, or xenophobia.

Shinigami Eyes:

Extension for Quickly Spotting Transphobes Online.

Shinigami Eyes

spoiler iphone: unofficial workaround to use extension Install the Orion browser then add the extension. :::

Related:!lgbtq_plus@lemmy.blahaj.zone

!intersex@lemmy.blahaj.zone


founded 9 months ago
MODERATORS
top 3 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Zorsith@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Provisions removed TL;DR:

a new requirement for family-court judges to consider one parent’s misgendering or deadnaming of their child in custody proceedings. They also stripped language related to publishing materials that deadname or misgender someone.

[–] hildegarde@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Although those parts are removed, some anti-discrimination rules against dead naming are still included.

This bill obviously worse in its current form, it is still positive for Coloradans, though not quite as much as it could be.

Should it pass into law, the bill would still protect transgender people from being misgendered or deadnamed, or referred to by the name they used before they transitioned, in discrimination laws for places like work and school. It would also enact shield-law protections for Coloradans against other states’ anti-transgender policies, and it would make changes to policies for name alterations on marriage certificates and gender markers on driver’s licenses.

[–] Zorsith@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 1 week ago

Absolutely, perfect should not be the enemy of good here.