We didn’t vote for your policies. We should not be subjected to your policies
Yeah, that's not how democracy works.
We didn’t vote for your policies. We should not be subjected to your policies
Yeah, that's not how democracy works.
While true, self determination is important to a degree. I'd wager there would be some brexit-like regret here if SI left NYC, I can see why a sophomoric analysis could be that being lumped with the other boroughs removes there self determination.
While the island wasn't part of some gerrandering plot to be watered down democratically by NYC, I can see why they might feel the same way a city in a red state, split into two red districts might feel.
It's similar to the Texans calling for secession. They want all of the benefits of independence, without any of the burdens.
To be clear, I think they're just talking abour seceding from New York state, not the USA which is what Texas was talking about. I think Staten Island is advocating to become their own state, although I might be wrong.
You are wrong, this is about seceding from New York City. NYC is currently composed of five boroughs, and Staten Island is one of them. So they want to separate from the city (and all that sweet Wall St. Tax revenue) and pay for their local government themselves.
Although I wouldn't be surprised if they thought about leaving New York State, too. Maybe New Jersey would take them. Not sure if they would consider that an improvement though. Perhaps they should become an exclave of Florida, most of them will retire there anyway so it saves a step.
New Jersey would never take them, trust me.
Many NJ residents would support the idea of removing the bridges and building a wall along Arthur Kill to keep out SI refugees.
OK, so this is even less like Texas. There's a pretty big difference between "We should secede from the US" and "We should be our own city outside this other cities jurisdiction".
It's obviously a difference of scale, but the point I was trying to make is that both groups talk about secession because they don't like specific policies that are affecting them in ways they don't like, while seemingly ignoring the broader macro-scale problems that they would cause for themselves if they actually went through with it. (The article is specifically about these problems as they relate to Staten Island seceding from NYC.)
They want to secede from NYC and become their own city with their own mayor.
They want to start their own city with blackjack and hookers?
If only.
As a transplant from Brooklyn, I’d much rather stay a part of NYC. Maybe the racists can just like…leave?
I can't imagine that working out well for Staten Island.
I doubt it would happen but as someone with no connection to Staten Island it would be fun to watch it play out.
You listening Huston?
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News