57
[meta] What do you guys think about a rule for reposts? (lemmy.world)
submitted 1 year ago by loopy@lemmy.world to c/dadjokes@lemmy.world
6 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I know back in the old country (blueit er redhat or whatever it was) there was a rule for waiting a year or some time before reposts were allowed again. Should there be something like that here?

On an unrelated note, I got my friend the other day with a zinger. They were recovering from surgery and said they were moving up their diet and the nurse was getting them a liquid menu. I said, “LIQUID MENU? HOW ARE YOU GONNA HOLD IT?” …I think I could hear eyes rolled over the phone.

top 6 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] fakeman_pretendname@feddit.uk 8 points 1 year ago

I'm sure that not everyone will agree, but it's a little bit sparse for content at the moment, so I'd be inclined to "just churn it out for a while", reposts and all, and maybe make that rule in six months.

As this is a Dad jokes post, I was going to tell a bad joke about chemistry, but I didn’t think it would get a reaction.

[-] lando55@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

I was going to tell a bad joke about chemistry, but I didn’t think it would get a reaction.

I disagree, this could be the catalyst we need for change

[-] Syrc@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

Would be appreciated. Obviously without punishment, just remove the post (unless it’s a very frequent offender)

[-] lando55@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

What do you guys think about a rule for reposts?

[-] Melody@lemmy.one 6 points 1 year ago

3-6 months and remove; no warning/action unless very frequent or persistent.

[-] Unforeseen@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago

This is pretty solid

this post was submitted on 05 Sep 2023
57 points (98.3% liked)

Dad Jokes

15728 readers
713 users here now

Description

This is a community for sharing those cheesy “dad” jokes that invoke an eye roll or chuckle.

Rules

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
loopy@lemmy.world